They were discussing the 2012 NIT game....which is why he posted the exact score from that game and even posted that was the game he was talking about.
Is reading that hard for you?
Oregon
- Thread starter JerryDennard
- Start date
They were discussing the 2012 NIT game....which is why he posted the exact score from that game and even posted that was the game he was talking about.
Is reading that hard for you?
No moron, I said the O/U bet of 190 was for THIS UPCOMING GAME.
What, you think I am betting on what the total score was for a game that was played 6 years ago???
What, you think I am betting on what the total score was for a game that was played 6 years ago???
You clearly replied to his posting of the score from 2012.
Is reading hard for you Legend? Is English not your first language?
Look - let me use small words - sports betting is something you do *before* a game is played, not *after*. If I'm putting up a WAGER on an Over-Under of 190, I'm talking about a future event - the Iowa / Oregon game *to be played* on Thursday.
Why would I *bet* that the score of a game that was in 2012 was over or under 190 points? Do you think I'm betting on how arithmetic works?
Are you that dense or are you simply trying to weasel out of a bet, because nobody thinks that sports betting works by betting on a game after it is played.
Look - let me use small words - sports betting is something you do *before* a game is played, not *after*. If I'm putting up a WAGER on an Over-Under of 190, I'm talking about a future event - the Iowa / Oregon game *to be played* on Thursday.
Why would I *bet* that the score of a game that was in 2012 was over or under 190 points? Do you think I'm betting on how arithmetic works?
Are you that dense or are you simply trying to weasel out of a bet, because nobody thinks that sports betting works by betting on a game after it is played.
Pretty clear he intended to bet on the upcoming game
We may end up with a Legend13 after Thursday's game.
If Vegas oddsmakers release a similar line I will be hammering Oregon; haven’t seen anything to tell me differently yet.
This is how NBC sees the results leading to the championship game of the 2K Classic. They have Syracuse vs Oregon in championship. They say we will be relevant in conference play. Is that like an honorable mention? 
https://collegebasketball.nbcsports...ic-field-featuring-cuse-vs-uconn-will-be-fun/
https://collegebasketball.nbcsports...ic-field-featuring-cuse-vs-uconn-will-be-fun/
Interesting. I can't see Vegas being near that. Hope I am wrong on the end result tho... Would love to see Dana go down.
Curious, what did kenpom have our spread at for the last two games?
This game absolutely reeks of the freshman-superstar-break-out kind of game. Fran has never had an Iowa team beat one of this quality early in the season. There are zero signs so far that they seem capable of competing in this game.
Best Fran wins at Iowa in the early season have been against Xavier in 2013-14 where they won in OT in one of the Thanksgiving tournament (Cayman maybe?) then Iowa lost in OT to a very good Villanova team. Xavier was a 5 seed in the NCAA tournament that year. In 2015-16 Iowa beat Wichita State after losing first 2 games in one of those Thanksgiving tourneys. WSU ended up being an NCAA tourney team.
In 2014-15, Iowa did win at North Carolina in the Big 10/ACC challenge. Probably the best non-conference win of the McCaffery era at Iowa. That game was played on Dec. 3. But yes, to your point it would be unusual for Iowa to win a game against an opponent of this caliber at this point in the season.
Wasnt WSU missing some key guys that game? I want to say Fred Van Fleet didnt play.
Edit, yes WSU was missing 2 guys in Van Fleet and Anton Grady.
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/recap?gameId=400854243
Fran should have enough bodies to run into Bol so I like our match up from that perspective, just have to attack him early to get him in foul trouble. I would like to see Connor get ample time early so there is someone in the game that can feed the post with good passes, can't get Bol in foul trouble if we can't feed the post.
@TomKakert can we get a ruling on this thread?
It appears @JerryDennard shouldn't be able to post anymore based on how I read the bet he made with @Legend12 .
It appears @JerryDennard shouldn't be able to post anymore based on how I read the bet he made with @Legend12 .
That's the way it reads to me as well. Jerry, looks like you lost the bet on a game that was already played.
As the other person in this "wager" I request that Jerry still continue to post here.
My initial post regarding taking his wager was obviously not a serious one as I knew he was confused on what game was being discussed. His hateful and mean words later are something I can deal with over time, as eventually the pain will heal.
My initial post regarding taking his wager was obviously not a serious one as I knew he was confused on what game was being discussed. His hateful and mean words later are something I can deal with over time, as eventually the pain will heal.
Early in the year should be to Iowa's advantage, since most of Oregon's best players are either out or true freshmen. Oregon could be a scary team to play later in the season. Iowa needs to minimize unforced turnovers, win on the boards, and play physical, especially with Bol Bol. Luka and Kriener need to use their fouls effectively. Is Fran allowed to shove Cook and Moss around a little to wake them up before the game?
I wasn't making an over/under bet about a game that was played 6 years ago. Read the thread.
I wasn't betting on the 2011 game. I misinterpreted what the other guy said as his prediction for Thursday which is why it's phrased as an O/U of 190.
No, he didnt. He took it on the game that you asked him to take it on which was played in March of 2012.
