A feisty 1st post.Any quotes from Joe on this? Or is this just “inside info” you got from your so-called sources that tipped you off to Cook’s season ending ankle surgery this past year? They were spot-on with that one....
A feisty 1st post.Any quotes from Joe on this? Or is this just “inside info” you got from your so-called sources that tipped you off to Cook’s season ending ankle surgery this past year? They were spot-on with that one....
In the role he was supposed to be in - back-up PG to Bohannon. - he did have a good year for a Freshman PG not expected to carry many minutes. Because of Moss’s poor play overall and lack of ball handling ability (and Dailey nit improving as hoped), more minutes were put in Connor then should have been.
Fran initially talked about Patrick redshirting....and I am certain that they seriously considered it. That said, I always assumed that with the exception of being injured, he was going to play. He's to good of a player not to. I think he backs up Joe W where he gets maybe 10 minutes a game...maybe more if Joe slides over and plays the 2G much.
I think it's important that he does play...gives him a chance to get the experience and learn how much stronger he needs to be. What works and what doesn't. This then sets him on the right path if Joe goes pro after this year.
Fran said Patrick will redshirt if he doesn't hit his target weight. I believe that was 190?? He isn't going to make that.
PMac will find out on day one he isn't physically ready. That doesn't mean he isn't skilled. He just needs to develop his body. That is what a redshirt is for. See Baer, Nunge, and on and on....
I like Fran, but he messed up by having too few swing players. We need two more players that can handle the 2/3 positions. Moss didn't help. But coach has/had plenty of scholarships, with his sons able to use theirs if necessary. Which it is not as we have two available now.
I like Fran, but he messed up by having too few swing players. We need two more players that can handle the 2/3 positions. Moss didn't help. But coach has/had plenty of scholarships, with his sons able to use theirs if necessary. Which it is not as we have two available now.
We are looking at a 10 man rotation this year. 4 guards. 2 SF. 4 posts. Granted, there will be a big problem with backcourt inexperience. Other than that, the team looks pretty well balanced from a position standpoint. Not sure how you fit 3 more swing players on that team.
You love that emoji ♂️
Fran said Patrick will redshirt if he doesn't hit his target weight. I believe that was 190?? He isn't going to make that.
PMac will find out on day one he isn't physically ready. That doesn't mean he isn't skilled. He just needs to develop his body. That is what a redshirt is for. See Baer, Nunge, and on and on....
I like Fran, but he messed up by having too few swing players. We need two more players that can handle the 2/3 positions. Moss didn't help. But coach has/had plenty of scholarships, with his sons able to use theirs if necessary. Which it is not as we have two available now.
Baer was a walkon and Nunge plays in the post.
Pat will most definitely play this year.
And your point would be??
PMac would most certainly benefit from a redshirt. Without question. His dad has said so... The selfish side of me would much rather see him play as a redshirt senior.
If you are to consider how much better a player he would be as a 5th year senior vs a 175# freshman. The tradeoffs are enormous. He would be a much bigger force and benefit to the team in that regard.
When would PMac play, if he plays this year? Answer: When Joe Wieskamp needs a breather. Literally. That is it.
The question is simple, how much of a benefit is he going to be spelling Joe Wieskamp for a few minutes a game?
The ONLY scenarios where I see a potentially big enough benefit for the redshirt to not be used, is if our backcourt is that bad... So bad we are forced to play Joe W at the 2. That would be a nightmare scenario for the Hawks.
OR PMac somehow gains a ton of weight and muscle in the next 5 months, and becomes so good that he HAS to start(or play major minutes). Then we have no choice but to move Joe W to the 2, so Patrick can play the 3, his only position he will be able to play....
This last scenario will not happen. But I would certainly be happy to eat a large plate of crow, if it does!!!
Joe will play some 2 this year. PMac will average 15+ mpg.
Some people just don't comprehend the difference between a walk on and top 100 prospect.
A redshirt would help anyone. That's an obtuse argument. You could make that claim about AJ Epenesa. The bottom line is Pat will help this team this season.
There is the possibility that Joe W could be gone after this year if he has a top end year. Playing Patrick could be getting him ready for next year in this scenario.And your point would be??
PMac would most certainly benefit from a redshirt. Without question. His dad has said so... The selfish side of me would much rather see him play as a redshirt senior.
If you are to consider how much better a player he would be as a 5th year senior vs a 175# freshman. The tradeoffs are enormous. He would be a much bigger force and benefit to the team in that regard.
When would PMac play, if he plays this year? Answer: When Joe Wieskamp needs a breather. Literally. That is it.
The question is simple, how much of a benefit is he going to be spelling Joe Wieskamp for a few minutes a game?
The ONLY scenarios where I see a potentially big enough benefit for the redshirt to not be used, is if our backcourt is that bad... So bad we are forced to play Joe W at the 2. That would be a nightmare scenario for the Hawks.
OR PMac somehow gains a ton of weight and muscle in the next 5 months, and becomes so good that he HAS to start(or play major minutes). Then we have no choice but to move Joe W to the 2, so Patrick can play the 3, his only position he will be able to play....
This last scenario will not happen. But I would certainly be happy to eat a large plate of crow, if it does!!!
Patrick will go down as one of the greatest all around Hawks ever!
Count me in the club that thinks we are going to have a rough time if Patrick plays significant minutes on this team. He’s not athletic enough to play the 3 and doesn’t have the body/weight needed to play the 4. We just don’t have the athleticism on this team at guard to compete.
To me, considering most teams play at least 3 if not 4 guards at the same time these days you need 5-6 high quality guards in order to contend for a top 8 finish in the B1G. We don’t have that IMO. 1 solid player (Weiskamp), 2 rookies (Toussaint and Fredrick), and 2 marginal players (Evelyn and CMac). An average B1G team is going to have 3 decent vets, 2 rookies, and 1 marginal player at that position let alone a contender. Some of the expectations on this board for next year need to be reigned in big time - this is why many of us were so upset at the contract extension last year combined with the roster collapse/lack of recruiting to begin this offseason.
If we signed any other player in the world with patricks resume we would wonder if we can keep him four years
If Patrick plays significant minutes, it will be because he is that good. And that would be great, but not expected.Count me in the club that thinks we are going to have a rough time if Patrick plays significant minutes on this team. He’s not athletic enough to play the 3 and doesn’t have the body/weight needed to play the 4. We just don’t have the athleticism on this team at guard to compete.
To me, considering most teams play at least 3 if not 4 guards at the same time these days you need 5-6 high quality guards in order to contend for a top 8 finish in the B1G. We don’t have that IMO. 1 solid player (Weiskamp), 2 rookies (Toussaint and Fredrick), and 2 marginal players (Evelyn and CMac). An average B1G team is going to have 3 decent vets, 2 rookies, and 1 marginal player at that position let alone a contender. Some of the expectations on this board for next year need to be reigned in big time - this is why many of us were so upset at the contract extension last year combined with the roster collapse/lack of recruiting to begin this offseason.
Count me in the club that thinks we are going to have a rough time if Patrick plays significant minutes on this team. He’s not athletic enough to play the 3 and doesn’t have the body/weight needed to play the 4. We just don’t have the athleticism on this team at guard to compete.
To me, considering most teams play at least 3 if not 4 guards at the same time these days you need 5-6 high quality guards in order to contend for a top 8 finish in the B1G. We don’t have that IMO. 1 solid player (Weiskamp), 2 rookies (Toussaint and Fredrick), and 2 marginal players (Evelyn and CMac). An average B1G team is going to have 3 decent vets, 2 rookies, and 1 marginal player at that position let alone a contender. Some of the expectations on this board for next year need to be reigned in big time - this is why many of us were so upset at the contract extension last year combined with the roster collapse/lack of recruiting to begin this offseason.
Count me in the club that thinks we are going to have a rough time if Patrick plays significant minutes on this team. He’s not athletic enough to play the 3 and doesn’t have the body/weight needed to play the 4. We just don’t have the athleticism on this team at guard to compete.
To me, considering most teams play at least 3 if not 4 guards at the same time these days you need 5-6 high quality guards in order to contend for a top 8 finish in the B1G. We don’t have that IMO. 1 solid player (Weiskamp), 2 rookies (Toussaint and Fredrick), and 2 marginal players (Evelyn and CMac). An average B1G team is going to have 3 decent vets, 2 rookies, and 1 marginal player at that position let alone a contender. Some of the expectations on this board for next year need to be reigned in big time - this is why many of us were so upset at the contract extension last year combined with the roster collapse/lack of recruiting to begin this offseason.
Name 4 B1G teams that have 5-6 "high-quality guards" and name the guards. This is a ridiculously high standard. Most teams don't even have 6 guards on their team unless you count small forwards as guards, and that is not what you said. Keep in mind that you consider Wieskamp to just be "solid", and you aren't counting "rookies".Count me in the club that thinks we are going to have a rough time if Patrick plays significant minutes on this team. He’s not athletic enough to play the 3 and doesn’t have the body/weight needed to play the 4. We just don’t have the athleticism on this team at guard to compete.
To me, considering most teams play at least 3 if not 4 guards at the same time these days you need 5-6 high quality guards in order to contend for a top 8 finish in the B1G. We don’t have that IMO. 1 solid player (Weiskamp), 2 rookies (Toussaint and Fredrick), and 2 marginal players (Evelyn and CMac). An average B1G team is going to have 3 decent vets, 2 rookies, and 1 marginal player at that position let alone a contender. Some of the expectations on this board for next year need to be reigned in big time - this is why many of us were so upset at the contract extension last year combined with the roster collapse/lack of recruiting to begin this offseason.
Count me in the club that thinks we are going to have a rough time if Patrick plays significant minutes on this team. He’s not athletic enough to play the 3 and doesn’t have the body/weight needed to play the 4. We just don’t have the athleticism on this team at guard to compete.
To me, considering most teams play at least 3 if not 4 guards at the same time these days you need 5-6 high quality guards in order to contend for a top 8 finish in the B1G. We don’t have that IMO. 1 solid player (Weiskamp), 2 rookies (Toussaint and Fredrick), and 2 marginal players (Evelyn and CMac). An average B1G team is going to have 3 decent vets, 2 rookies, and 1 marginal player at that position let alone a contender. Some of the expectations on this board for next year need to be reigned in big time - this is why many of us were so upset at the contract extension last year combined with the roster collapse/lack of recruiting to begin this offseason.
Who is Scott Doyle? Any relation to Chris?
![]()
Interesting. I thought he had a terrible season. He couldn't shoot or defend. Good thing he didnt really turn the ball over. Oh wait that's only because he is fully incapable of beating anyone of the dribble so rarely did he try. Literally almost all of the big runs to either bury us in games last year or bring the game close was with him in the game. All of this said I haven't given up on him as he was a Frosh and played hard but dont try and spin any other way then he was a liability last yearConnor had a really good season ....
Interesting. I thought he had a terrible season. He couldn't shoot or defend. Good thing he didnt really turn the ball over. Oh wait that's only because he is fully incapable of beating anyone of the dribble so rarely did he try. Literally almost all of the big runs to either bury us in games last year or bring the game close was with him in the game. All of this said I haven't given up on him as he was a Frosh and played hard but dont try and spin any other way then he was a liability last year[/QUOTE
He did have a really good season for a freshmen. Passing was outstanding, quarterbacked the team when he was in game. Saying he didn’t get by anyone clearly is wrong I guess those driving layups were just wide open lanes. Sure he struggled from three but he isn’t the first freshman to do that. Kid was a top rotation player for a team that lost to the best team in the country in overtime - round 32. Pretty good year!
Interesting. I thought he had a terrible season. He couldn't shoot or defend. Good thing he didnt really turn the ball over. Oh wait that's only because he is fully incapable of beating anyone of the dribble so rarely did he try. Literally almost all of the big runs to either bury us in games last year or bring the game close was with him in the game. All of this said I haven't given up on him as he was a Frosh and played hard but dont try and spin any other way then he was a liability last year
Interesting. I thought he had a terrible season. He couldn't shoot or defend. Good thing he didnt really turn the ball over. Oh wait that's only because he is fully incapable of beating anyone of the dribble so rarely did he try. Literally almost all of the big runs to either bury us in games last year or bring the game close was with him in the game. All of this said I haven't given up on him as he was a Frosh and played hard but dont try and spin any other way then he was a liability last year
I think Connor had a fairly average season for a Freshman. He made some mistakes and he did some good things. I expect Connor to be much better in the coming season. If there is no growth, that would be cause for concern.