Let them eat cake? You really going with this?Maybe you or birch can bake them a cake.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let them eat cake? You really going with this?Maybe you or birch can bake them a cake.
God damn DooBi…kinda like a tax code for poor folks, ain’t it?I'm in between on this one. I'd be ok with some more limitations on what they can get. I'd like to know how "already restricted" the author thinks it is. I don't think it should be as limited as wic but some more limitations are in line.
I've been in grocery for 18 years. Even in a small northwest Iowa town there is literally several times a day that someone buys a cart full of groceries with snap and then uses cash for a bottle of liquor, a carton of cigarettes or both. I can't even imagine how often it happens in larger markets. We are effectively paying for TONS of alcohol and tobacco with our taxes. Tons.
The first two and a half pages are solely breakfast cereals and bread. But you're right...breakfast three times a day will prevent starvation.
Let them eat cake? You really going with this?
This isn't about getting the debt under control, you're gonna have to spend more money to enforce the new rules. It's just pure vengeance against poor people, and you're sure as hell not going to get the debt under control anyway by cutting poor people programs exclusively.If we don’t get our debt under control, there is going to be hell to pay, and the poor will suffer the most.
So make them suffer now?
So, you favor getting rid of all subsidies?
You really think banning flour for poor people will repair the budget? This won't do anything to reduce the deficit. All it will do is to unnecessarily make poor people's already hard lives a little shittier.Yes. The suffering can be more mild and managed.
Not necessarily, but I’d be interested in his list of what should and shouldn’t be.
People that complain about the debt have no further to look for the cause: Wealthy individuals and wealthy companies. Buying their legislators like it is a video game
It's just pure vengeance against poor people, and you're sure as hell not going to get the debt under control anyway by cutting poor people programs exclusively.
.
You really think banning flour for poor people will repair the budget? This won't do anything to reduce the deficit. All it will do is to unnecessarily make poor people's already hard lives a little shittier.
I love how you keep using the word ‘ban’ as if poor people are no longer allowed to have flour. They can still own flour, it just isn’t free anymore.You really think banning flour for poor people will repair the budget? This won't do anything to reduce the deficit. All it will do is to unnecessarily make poor people's already hard lives a little shittier.
If true this is outrageous. They need to cut that in half at least. No wonder we are in a mess in this country. Hopefully the $680 is a major typo. So many jobs out there but unfortunately many people don't want to work. And the Left seems to support that.I love how you keep using the word ‘ban’ as if poor people are no longer allowed to have flour. They can still own flour, it just isn’t free anymore.
Is the purpose of the SNAP program to help with groceries or is it to provide absolutely all of their groceries? Has the total benefit cap been reduced? Because unless I missed something, a family of four still gets something like $680/month to help with their grocery bill.
Most on benefits work, just do not make enough to makes ends meet. SNAP is a supplement and the benefit size is all based on income/living expenses. Don’t fall for all the rhetoric it is people not working, as that is in most cases not true. Also, $680 for a month to feed a family of 4 really isn’t much if you break down how much food costs now.If true this is outrageous. They need to cut that in half at least. No wonder we are in a mess in this country. Hopefully the $680 is a major typo. So many jobs out there but unfortunately many people don't want to work. And the Left seems to support that.
How to say you have no clue what you are talking about without saying you have no clue. You should sit this one out.If true this is outrageous. They need to cut that in half at least. No wonder we are in a mess in this country. Hopefully the $680 is a major typo. So many jobs out there but unfortunately many people don't want to work. And the Left seems to support that.