Pepsi question

[millah_22]

Is this a valid reason to call post B a pepsi?

Post A posted first.
-has garnered 2 responses

Post B posted 45 minutes later
-Has garnered 9 responses before OP of post A comes in to call it a pepsi

Is it still a pepsi? Or should the pepsi-ness of it be ignored since the later post has gotten more traction?

 

[Bro D]

Is this a valid reason to call post B a pepsi?

Post A posted first.
-has garnered 2 responses

Post B posted 45 minutes later
-Has garnered 9 responses before OP of post A comes in to call it a pepsi

Is it still a pepsi? Or should the pepsi-ness of it be ignored since the later post has gotten more traction?

That more of an RC Cola violation I would say

 

[torbee]

I think when a second-person submits the same content with a better headline that actually garners engagement, it shouldn't be a full Pepsi.

Maybe a Cyrstal Pepsi?

 

[Greenway4Prez]

I think when a second-person submits the same content with a better headline that actually garners engagement, it shouldn't be a full Pepsi.

Maybe a Cyrstal Pepsi?

This stuff was delicious and I am dying on that hill.

Carry on.

 

[McLovin32]

 

[ping72]

It’s still a Pepsi.

Unless the first time it was posted was by one of the crazies who are blocked by 80% of the people here. Hi Ryan!

 

[McLovin32]

It’s still a Pepsi.

Unless the first time it was posted was by one of the crazies who are blocked by 80% of the people here. Hi Ryan!

This is the correct answer.

 

[millah_22]

 

[noStemsnoSTICKS]

I'm embarrassed to admit this, but what's Pepsi mean, in the context of this message board?

I have a couple of fans here who will now highlight my post with a laughing emoji (thanks in advance), but I would love to finally know what pepsi means.

 

[torbee]

This stuff was delicious and I am dying on that hill.

Carry on.

It was basically this:

In liquid form.

 

[ping72]

I'm embarrassed to admit this, but what's Pepsi mean, in the context of this message board?

I have a couple of fans here who will now highlight my post with a laughing emoji (thanks in advance), but I would love to finally know what pepsi means.

 

[millah_22]

I'm embarrassed to admit this, but what's Pepsi mean, in the context of this message board?

I have a couple of fans here who will now highlight my post with a laughing emoji (thanks in advance), but I would love to finally know what pepsi means.

pepsicock used to have a terrible habit of posting a popular story like 3 days after it happened. Like I'm talking stories that would have 10 pages of content and still be on the front page, and he would come in and start a new thread on it.

 

[McLovin32]

pepsicock used to have a terrible habit of posting a popular story like 3 days after it happened. Like I'm taking stories that would have 10 pages of content and still be on the front page, and he would come in and start a new thread on it.

And now he just posts in political threads with a gif or a 1-3 word reply that has nothing to do with the topic of the thread.

 

[Moral]

And now he just posts in political threads with a gif or a 1-3 word reply that has nothing to do with the topic of the thread.

No turkey in the oven. Good job libs!

 

[noStemsnoSTICKS]

pepsicock used to have a terrible habit of posting a popular story like 3 days after it happened. Like I'm taking stories that would have 10 pages of content and still be on the front page, and he would come in and start a new thread on it.

GOT IT!!!

Thank you.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

Aside from a poorly named thread title, the second thread deserves all the scorn and ridicule that comes with the Pepsi designation.

 

[TJ8869]

It’s still a Pepsi.

Unless the first time it was posted was by one of the crazies who are blocked by 80% of the people here. Hi Ryan!

Or if the title of the original thread didn’t clearly indicate the subject material or couldn’t be found with keyword search because they just posted a tweet that doesn’t show up in searches.

 

[millah_22]

And now he just posts in political threads with a gif or a 1-3 word reply that has nothing to do with the topic of the thread.

and one of those 3 words will be misspelled or the completely wrong word altogether.

 

[Ghee Buttersnaps]

Is this a valid reason to call post B a pepsi?

Post A posted first.
-has garnered 2 responses

Post B posted 45 minutes later
-Has garnered 9 responses before OP of post A comes in to call it a pepsi

Is it still a pepsi? Or should the pepsi-ness of it be ignored since the later post has gotten more traction?

Depends.

Did your mangina hurt when you typed this? I can create a decision flow diagram for you, if it will help.

 

[millah_22]

Depends.

Did your mangina hurt when you typed this? I can create a decision flow diagram for you, if it will help.

Pepsi question

Is this a valid reason to call post B a pepsi? Post A posted first. -has garnered 2 responses Post B posted 45 minutes later -Has garnered 9 responses before OP of post A comes in to call it a pepsi Is it still a pepsi? Or should the pepsi-ness of it be ignored since the later post has gotten...

iowa.forums.rivals.com

i already said it wasn't about me you wet wipe.

 

[millah_22]

Aside from a poorly named thread title, the second thread deserves all the scorn and ridicule that comes with the Pepsi designation.

Even after it becomes clear that the people have chosen that thread instead?

 

[Ghee Buttersnaps]

wet wipe.

 

[Fan In Black]

the 2nd post is the Pepsi post. always. that is the rule.

 

[Huey Grey]

In the spirit of who Pepsi was named after, it's not a Pepsi. A true Pepsi is posting the same content into a new thread that a bunch of people already knew about from an existing thread.

If nobody knew about the original thread it's hard to call it a Pepsi, imo. The whole gag of a pepsi is that somebody saw the original thread, said eff it, and decided to create their own thread just because.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

The whole gag of a pepsi is that somebody saw the original thread, said eff it, and decided to create their own thread just because.

Nonsense. The majority of these are NOT intentional.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

Even after it becomes clear that the people have chosen that thread instead?

Yes. People need to comply with the rules of civilized society.

 

[JustSayOV]

This is not a simple black and white answer.

While the contents of Post B may indeed be "Pepsi" in regards to Post A, there also needs to be some responsibility taken for the thread title.

If the thread title of post A sucks and is not clear as to what it includes, I feel there should be some leniency given to the OP of post B.

(now if both Post A and Post B thread titles clearly state " @millah_22 molests collies" then it's Pepsi all the way and OP of Post B should be drawn & quartered)

 

[torbee]

In the spirit of who Pepsi was named after, it's not a Pepsi. A true Pepsi is posting the same content into a new thread that a bunch of people already knew about from an existing thread.

If nobody knew about the original thread it's hard to call it a Pepsi, imo. The whole gag of a pepsi is that somebody saw the original thread, said eff it, and decided to create their own thread just because.

The board idiot has weighed in and disagreed with you.

Feel free to bask in your correctness.

 

[THE_DEVIL]

I once Pepsied myself...in the same thread. I don;t remember the circumstance but I did get the deserved scorn from HBOT/HROT/HORT

 

[runkpanole]

This question is so good that a poll was created earlier in the week to decide which title was the best. The Pepsi offender didn’t take too kindly to the poll.

 

[millah_22]

This question is so good that a poll was created earlier in the week to decide which title was the best. The Pepsi offender didn’t take too kindly to the poll.

I ask this because I've seen a few times now a poster call a thread a pepsi and link his own thread on the topic. I click the link and it has no discussion.