Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m hearing oliver martin is changing positions and will be taking the starting qb job.Next QB?
Or Peyton Mansell. Spring ball will tell a lot. Maybe decided during summer?Next QB?
Or Peyton Mansell. Spring ball will tell a lot. Maybe decided during summer?
So its set in stone after Kids day? Seems like a healthy competition in progress. These men came here to play.Petras will start. Anyone who watched Kid's Day and has listened to BF talk about him would understand.
So its set in stone after Kids day? Seems like a healthy competition in progress. These men came here to play.
What about the kid from CO- Padilla?
I doubt many coaches would say "i don't trust the backups, they're kinda iffy".You acknowledged only part of my statement. Listen to Brian Ferentz.
He's had a few press conferences where he's bragged about Petras' development. He said after Nebraska that he would have been very comfortable playing Petras if Stanley was hurt.
It's also telling when Petras beats out the more veteran Mansell for the backup spot.
BF has compared Petras to Stanley and if you recall, Stanley went without a redshirt because the staff were so impressed.
Petras has essentially been annointed by this staff.
He hasn't won the job yet, I am guessing he might have a slight edge right now but the comp will be decided in the Spring likely unless there isn't huge separation then it could move into early Fall camp.
according to today’s article in The Athletic Petras....”clearly won the backup job”.
We shall see ....all our QBs are very good and all bring needed talents to our roster. Time will tell. Go Hawks!
I doubt many coaches would say "i don't trust the backups, they're kinda iffy".
That said, seems like he could be a good one. Time will tell!
The point is BF has made numerous comments about how well Petras has developed over two years and comparing him to Stanley. I don't recall the same for Mansell or Padilla.
Well at the beginning of the season I believe both KF and BF said they would be comfortable with either backup playing. And O'Keefe said Padilla picked up the offense faster than any Freshman QB he has had.
While that's Kirk's pattern, Stanley was the #2 guy as a true freshman, beating out the previous year's #2, Wiegers, who was in his third season.Kirk is not known for picking a younger player over a more veteran one out of camp.
Goodson and LaPorta had to wait their turns.
The fact Petras beat out a more seasoned vet is telling that the camp battle wasn't as even as suggested. Kirk typically defers to the vets like he did starting Schulte over Nixon and Hesse over AJ.
My guess is Petras starting and Padilla as the backup with Mansell transferring and Hogan Redshirting.
That’s not true.Kirk is not known for picking a younger player over a more veteran one out of camp.
Goodson and LaPorta had to wait their turns.
The fact Petras beat out a more seasoned vet is telling that the camp battle wasn't as even as suggested. Kirk typically defers to the vets like he did starting Schulte over Nixon and Hesse over AJ.
Someone said he has CJ’s personality and nates arm
Whose accuracy? Inquiring minds want to know.
I fully expect Petras to be the starter, and I think either Mansell or Padilla could each be a very good option if Petras were not at Iowa.
Petras appears to be the least mobile, but has the best arm and best understanding of the offense. Seems like he fits the same mold as Stanley. Time will tell about his consistency. Stanley, at times, looked like an all american but struggled with consistency. I think Petras has a bit of an advantage by being on campus for 2 years before starting, and while in high school he passed the ball all over the field (he averaged ~47 pass attempts per game his senior year compared to Stanley's ~15 per game).
With all the receivers, running backs, and an emerging Sam Laporta at TE returning next year, whoever the starting QB is will have a lot of weapons to work with.
While that's Kirk's pattern, Stanley was the #2 guy as a true freshman, beating out the previous year's #2, Wiegers, who was in his third season.
Such articles generate expectations that frequently go into the stratosphere and subsequent disappointment even if the player produces at a high level. If Petras in his year one turns out as good as Stanley was as a senior, that would actually be a good thing but widespread reading of that article might get Petras categorized as a bust."The ball makes a distinctive whoosh sound coming out of Petras’ hand few quarterbacks can replicate."
https://www.daytondailynews.com/spo...hool-coach-john-elway/eCAZfLBGAzKy1ngEnkt0CP/
That coach is 39 and 4 overall and coached Jared Goff. Maybe he knows something? Where the comparison to Elway comes in IDK? Maybe he just sees it, like how some people see Stanley has somewhat comparables to Rothlesburger? It is hard to not get excited about Petras after reading that glowing review, and obviously, Petras is going to know about this kind of press, so he knows this is floating around out there. Buuuuuut yeah, pressure.Such articles generate expectations that frequently go into the stratosphere and subsequent disappointment even if the player produces at a high level. If Petras in his year one turns out as good as Stanley was as a senior, that would actually be a good thing but widespread reading of that article might get Petras categorized as a bust.
"The ball makes a distinctive whoosh sound coming out of Petras’ hand few quarterbacks can replicate."
https://www.daytondailynews.com/spo...hool-coach-john-elway/eCAZfLBGAzKy1ngEnkt0CP/
I got the same vibe from the staff about Stanley and Petras as I did about Tate. They just seem to have the intangibles that the staff is looking for in a QB.Exactly my point. When a younger player beats out a veteran it's a good indication he's next in line.
Someone said he has CJ’s personality and nates arm
That coach is 39 and 4 overall and coached Jared Goff. Maybe he knows something? Where the comparison to Elway comes in IDK? Maybe he just sees it, like how some people see Stanley has somewhat comparables to Rothlesburger? It is hard to not get excited about Petras after reading that glowing review, and obviously, Petras is going to know about this kind of press, so he knows this is floating around out there. Buuuuuut yeah, pressure.
I will, however, be bursting with anticipation by the time next year comes around. It could be another very special year.
I fully expect Petras to be the starter, and I think either Mansell or Padilla could each be a very good option if Petras were not at Iowa.
Petras appears to be the least mobile, but has the best arm and best understanding of the offense. Seems like he fits the same mold as Stanley. Time will tell about his consistency. Stanley, at times, looked like an all american but struggled with consistency. I think Petras has a bit of an advantage by being on campus for 2 years before starting, and while in high school he passed the ball all over the field (he averaged ~47 pass attempts per game his senior year compared to Stanley's ~15 per game).
With all the receivers, running backs, and an emerging Sam Laporta at TE returning next year, whoever the starting QB is will have a lot of weapons to work with.
"The ball makes a distinctive whoosh sound coming out of Petras’ hand few quarterbacks can replicate."
https://www.daytondailynews.com/spo...hool-coach-john-elway/eCAZfLBGAzKy1ngEnkt0CP/
Petras is the next Iowa QB... My guess is Hogan has the most legit shot to overtake the job... in two years...Next QB?