ADVERTISEMENT

Police told a father his 11-year-old could get ‘child porn’ charge, video shows

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,934
113
When a man in Ohio found out that someone online had manipulated his 11-year-old daughter into sending intimate photos of herself, he called police for help, according to a video shared widely on social media.

The man was hoping officers could speak with the girl to help her “realize what this was,” the video shows.

But when two Columbus police officers responded to the man’s home, one of them said that his daughter “could probably get charged with child porn,” according to the video.
“Who? She can?” the man responded in the video. “She’s 11 years old.”
Incredulous, he repeated his daughter’s age again a few seconds later.
“Doesn’t matter,” the same officer replied. “She’s still making porn.”

The video of the Sept. 15 exchange between the man and the officers, which appears to have been recorded from a camera outside the home, has been viewed more than 730,000 times since it was posted on TikTok over the weekend. On Monday, the Columbus Division of Police acknowledged the video, adding that the city’s inspector general had launched an investigation into the officers’ conduct.


Columbus police said in a statement that the division “regards all allegations of sexual misconduct with the utmost seriousness.” Officers are investigating the 11-year-old’s allegations, the statement adds.
The father and the officers have not been publicly identified. Officials have not disclosed whether the officers involved have been disciplined.

Police Chief Elaine Bryant said in a statement to The Washington Post on Tuesday that the department contacted the father to apologize “as soon as we learned of this incident” and to inform him that the officers’ response and alleged crime against his child would be “fully investigated.”

“My expectation is that our officers treat every victim of crime with compassion, decency, and dignity,” Bryant said. “What I saw in that video did not reflect that.”


At the start of the video, which is about 90 seconds long, the two Columbus police officers are seen walking up to a house, flashlights in hand.
After knocking on the door once, the officers exchanged conversation for about 30 seconds before knocking again. The man who made the call opened the door and began speaking to the officers about 50 seconds into the video.

In a caption on the video that circulated online, the man said he had called police around 6 p.m. and that they arrived around midnight. His daughter had gone to sleep, he told the officers, but he’d wanted them to “come over and talk to her” about online exploitation, the footage shows.
“There’s not much I can do about it, is there?” he asked.
One of the officers responded that the girl could be charged with child pornography. As the father emphasized his daughter’s age, the same officer asked: “She’s still creating it, right?”


“She’s 11 years old,” the man said for the second time.
A few seconds later, after the man emphasized that the girl is “being manipulated” by an adult online, the officer asked: “Is she taking pictures though?”

Immediately after, the man started to go back inside the house, saying: “You guys have a nice evening,” the video shows.
As the video circulated online, the Columbus inspector general received complaints about the exchange, the department said in a statement.
If policies were violated, the inspector general will make recommendations to “restore, build and maintain public trust,” the department said.
 
Will the officers be disciplined? Not a f’ing chance in hell. The badge is a ticket to do pretty much as you please while living well off the taxpayers.
 
Insane. . .

If I had my wits about me I would respond with "Go ahead, find a prosecutor who is going to charge this case and a jury that is going to convict."

Of course the fact that his 11 year old was sending nude pictures to someone online and the police suggested she could be charged with the crime is obviously going to probably mean you arn't going to have your wits about you.

For the record what is up with an 11 year old having a smartphone or any cell phone and unmonitored access to the internet? My kids have neither and the oldest is 10. My kids only know how to use the apps that we set up for them for their online classes. They wouldn't know what to do if we just put on Google Chrome and said "here you go"
 
The american police force has largely forgotten that they are supposed to protect citizens and now look mainly at arresting them.
He called them for help, and that was the response he got. You think he's going to call for help, or give them the benefit of the doubt next time? Police create their own problems far too often.
 
this has been a bad loop hole for a while now. Teens being charged with crimes for sharing or possessing images with each other. It's stupid. 16 year old kid gets a nude from another 16 year old and one or both charged with child porn laws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pink shizzle
Insane. . .

If I had my wits about me I would respond with "Go ahead, find a prosecutor who is going to charge this case and a jury that is going to convict."

Of course the fact that his 11 year old was sending nude pictures to someone online and the police suggested she could be charged with the crime is obviously going to probably mean you arn't going to have your wits about you.

For the record what is up with an 11 year old having a smartphone or any cell phone and unmonitored access to the internet? My kids have neither and the oldest is 10. My kids only know how to use the apps that we set up for them for their online classes. They wouldn't know what to do if we just put on Google Chrome and said "here you go"
You might be surprised at how quickly they’d figure it out.

That said, my kids have largely gotten phones when they turn 12 in middle school. We do police their apps and monitor usage, but that still leaves gaps when they can do stupid things or be influenced by others. We’ve had a lot of talks about appropriate behavior and all, so I’m mostly hoping for the best along with the monitoring and us being able to spot-check their phones whenever (and each kid has a set time to bring the phone down to a common charging area before bed).
 
Time for a new police chief. This call should have been routed to detectives specializing in such matters, not two random patrol officers arriving at midnight - six hours after father phoned.

Officer obviously needs more training, but the whole episode suggests administrative chaos in the department.
 
You might be surprised at how quickly they’d figure it out.

That said, my kids have largely gotten phones when they turn 12 in middle school. We do police their apps and monitor usage, but that still leaves gaps when they can do stupid things or be influenced by others. We’ve had a lot of talks about appropriate behavior and all, so I’m mostly hoping for the best along with the monitoring and us being able to spot-check their phones whenever (and each kid has a set time to bring the phone down to a common charging area before bed).

I don't know if we've decided when we would give them phones, might depend on the kid.

All of them still seem far too young and immature to have one.
 
My nephew had a friend get told that same thing when they were 12. A girl in his class asked for a video of him jerking it and he obliged. Word got around and the girls dad found out and called the cops. The video was found and the kid was visited by the police and told he might be charged with child pornography. He ended up getting banned from all social media until he was 21.
 
I don't know if we've decided when we would give them phones, might depend on the kid.

All of them still seem far too young and immature to have one.
We did evaluate ours independently, but we thought they were ready in similar time frames. There comes a point as they approach teenage years and are out doing more things with friends that the ability to check in makes a difference. I think back to my not needing a phone, but I also remember having quarters in my school bags, sports bags and usually in my pocket because there were pay phones everywhere. Not true today. So in our house, it’s part gadget and a way to show some responsibility, but also part safety and peace of mind.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT