I went 5 seed.
Not sure why you would even provide the option for anything above a 7 seed, so figured you must know something the rest of us don’t.
The seeding doesn't really matter. The best we can do is win one game and then we're done.
True...along with a great jobAll of your posts are a real treat. I bet you’re a joy to be around and have a boatload of friends.
I’m guessing committee has a few wrinkles this year. Wouldn’t be shocked to see Iowa a 7 or a 10. Don’t know what their value on the NET or bad losses or non-conf schedules. Just a bunch of guess work!
Switch Iowa for one of the "Wofford / Nevada" predicted positions.
The Iowa State / Oregon non-conf wins look better, and the stupid committee will look at this as one body of work.
So Iowa wins that tie breaker, and is in at 7.
True, but the committee is so stupid and does wtf things most years. I can just see them doing this but idk lol. If Nevada had finished out, but that loss to San Diego State..I wish, brother, but the committee loves Nevada and they will show the same preference to Wofford as well.
True, but the committee is so stupid and does wtf things most years. I can just see them doing this but idk lol. If Nevada had finished out, but that loss to San Diego State..
Yea these ppl who are all about Iowa at a 10 seed need to look at the huge chasm of shit below the 8 range, and re-evaluate. However, the Iowa non-conf sos is still bad, but Oregon helps balance that out. And, Iowa had "good intentions" with the non-conf, so may not be penalized as such. So many variables.I’m struggling with the 8-10 seeds as we speak. Most of these teams, Iowa included, have warts upon warts. The tallest midget gets the best seeds. Time to get out my measuring tape.