I know. Great reply. Convincing. I thought I was in the minority so I offered another response in support of the counter.Yes, this point has already been made and replied to earlier.
I know. Great reply. Convincing. I thought I was in the minority so I offered another response in support of the counter.Yes, this point has already been made and replied to earlier.
Was not for you. Was for the base. My freshman year was Jake C. I know a bad QB.If this is for me your addressing a point that wasn't made.
I know. Great reply. Convincing. I thought I was in the minority so I offered another response in support of the counter.
I was assuming you were playing the part of pissed September Iowa fan. I'm starting to think you're playing the part of Iowa football satirist and I'm starting to enjoy your work.Minority? Majority? No poll in this thread. You're playing Devil's advocate?
Was not for you. Was for the base. My freshman year was Jake C. I know a bad QB.
Edit:
(sic alert): "your"
Don't call me a girl when I type a LOL if you suck at your first language too.
I was assuming you were playing the part of pissed September Iowa fan. I'm starting to think you're playing the part of Iowa football satirist and I'm starting to enjoy your work.
Rick Stanzi got me re-addicted to chewing tobacco at SpoCo on Dubuque. It was after a Purdue victory. He saw me chewing Jack Links jerky chew and told me to knock it off and I listened. Don't doubt my orientations. I will not be kind to your children.Trans? That may explain much of your confusion.
Dumbass. Probably not in a close game. We've been fortunate enough to have two early season blowouts. Where are you from pony? I'd like to break it down to geography.So you don't think the backup should get reps or you do? Seems reasonable that any coach would want to prepare his 2nd string QB. No?
yep. get him some work with the no 1 O-line & wrs.
It ****ING happened. Dipshit. First d rive wasn't peace corps recruits. Holy shit. First team defensive rotation was still in.Thumbs up. This appears to be a very controversial thought to some folks. Not sure why.
A Des Moines lawyer? A real loser in his own profession?
I don't hate lawyers. I like them slightly less than other people I know. Don't confuse things. Why is this going on over football. I'm right. You probably didn't attend Iowa so who cares what you say. Those kind of thoughts.Hey if you hate lawyers, my opinion of your interpersonal skills just improved 47.629 %
It ****ING happened. Dipshit. First d rive wasn't peace corps recruits. Holy shit. First team defensive rotation was still in.
So you want the #2 QB to get to play half the game with the number one offensive line if we are up by 4 touchdowns but you don't want the number 2's on the offensive line to play. You only want the QB to play and the rest of team can go to he-- and take their chances on getting injured. You must room with Mansell or be related to him. This doesn't make sense but what does on this board. We win big and are undefeated and you still want a new coaching staff, new QB and new AD. NICEYou really think they are coming back from 24-0? Not with our defense and you know it
Mansell should get most, if not all, of the 4th quarter, and I think he will.
I'm not impressed with Stanley's lack of mobility...especially against UNI. One man coming through, and instead of simply side-stepping him, Stanley takes the sack. Not good.
I don't like your work thus far but I'm starting to appreciate it. But I still don't like it.Calm down. Things are gonna be fine. Some genius named KinnickatNight said this was a great thread and of course I will share the credit. I assume that was one of your concerns?
I don't hate lawyers. I like them slightly less than other people I know. Don't confuse things. Why is this going on over football. I'm right. You probably didn't attend Iowa so who cares what you say. Those kind of thoughts.
So you want the #2 QB to get to play half the game with the number one offensive line if we are up by 4 touchdowns but you don't want the number 2's on the offensive line to play. You only want the QB to play and the rest of team can go to he-- and take their chances on getting injured. You must room with Mansell or be related to him. This doesn't make sense but what does on this board. We win big and are undefeated and you still want a new coaching staff, new QB and new AD. NICE![]()
Mansell should get most, if not all, of the 4th quarter, and I think he will.
I'm not impressed with Stanley's lack of mobility...especially against UNI. One man coming through, and instead of simply side-stepping him, Stanley takes the sack. Not good.
You can keep the rock. Smack it against your head a few times.
I would like to see Stanley and Tom Brady race. I do think Iowa’s Offense is limited due to his inability to scramble or run.
You can keep the rock. Smack it against your head a few times.
No. Offense needs to keep getting things worked out. And if it's against the hapless Northern Iowa so be it
A half? If we were up more, maybe a quarter.
Not saying Mansell should be starting but how do you think Stanley would have looked out there tonight playing with mostly the 2nd team offense and with no Fant or Easly to throw to?
Loved Mansell on the play action, then he threw a pick directly to the defender. Decision cemented.
Yep personally I hope Petra’s beats him out next year!
I am serious, and don't call me Shirley asshole.I'm an alum. But you're under no obligation to believe that. Shirley you don't think the original post was overly dramatic or confusing, correct?
I am serious, and don't call me Shirley asshole.
I think I was misquoting Airplane.
You're not edgy, bitch. Make your way over to H-ROT. Stop pretending you're bold. Participate or STFU.PG rating. Same as HawkeyeReport.
You all need to remember: The fastest way to Kirk's bench is to commit turnovers.