Not cool if true.according to nomad on twitter (who is very good at predicting these things) the coaches didn’t enter anybody at 133. how does that happen?
Not cool if true.according to nomad on twitter (who is very good at predicting these things) the coaches didn’t enter anybody at 133. how does that happen?
Teske or Schriever isn't even a debate, imo.Mistake by the coaches, or a sign that Schriever is the guy this postseason? Let the rumors begin!
Pre-seeds will come out Monday.When do big 10 seeds come out?
This. His win over Noah Grover from Buffalo was at 165 so that’s thrown out. If he sits against Gfeller, he’s 9-3 against 157 competition which is 75% and he earns an allocation for the conference.Losing to Gfeller dropped his win % to 69%. If he would have won or even not have wrestled, he would have met silver criteria and almost certainly picked up an allocation.
Given that the dual was decided by then, TnT must feel pretty good about him qualifying.This. His win over Noah Grover from Buffalo was at 165 so that’s thrown out. If he sits against Gfeller, he’s 9-3 against 157 competition which is 75% and he earns an allocation for the conference.
If Cobe can’t finish top 10 at the Big 10 tournament, he’s probably not going to do much at Nationals anyway. He should qualify fairly easy.Given that the dual was decided by then, TnT must feel pretty good about him qualifying.
But the shoulder harness makes me think they should have weighed in two guys, instead.
Personally, I would always rather see the best guy out there wrestling, and not worry about rankings/seedings/allocations/whatever at the time. Wrestle the matches in front of you with your best possible lineup, and let the chips fall where mayGiven that the dual was decided by then, TnT must feel pretty good about him qualifying.
But the shoulder harness makes me think they should have weighed in two guys, instead.
I agree. I’m positive Brands fully believes Cobe will qualify by placing high enough at the Big 10 tourney.Personally, I would always rather see the best guy out there wrestling, and not worry about rankings/seedings/allocations/whatever at the time. Wrestle the matches in front of you with your best possible lineup, and let the chips fall where may
COBE had much to gain with a victory over Gfeller. He won’t be seeded any lower than 6 at Big Ten’s.This. His win over Noah Grover from Buffalo was at 165 so that’s thrown out. If he sits against Gfeller, he’s 9-3 against 157 competition which is 75% and he earns an allocation for the conference.
Teske should be ranked in final coaches poll now that he has 8 matches so gonna mark him as a lock.
Not sure how Teske didn’t get ranked in last coaches poll. Has the 8 matches needed. Only two losses are to RBY #1 and Fix #2. Beat LaMont and Burwick who are both ranked.
even if he is the guy, you would still submit teske just in case.
I wonder if coaches forgot him like they did RBY last week
according to nomad on twitter (who is very good at predicting these things) the coaches didn’t enter anybody at 133
So is the unstated consensus that Iowa didn't submit Teske to be ranked, to reduce 133 B1G allocations, with the hope this would increase the likelihood of Dresden/Burwick not making NCAAs, given every point counts at NCAAS?5d chess
Willie posted that evidently someone (NCAA or NWCA) screwed up as Teske wasn’t listed as an eligible candidate in the Coaches Rankings even though he met the minimum match criteria.
They are predicting Dean 1 and Warner 2. They are also predicting Dean to be the 1 seed and Warner to be the 4 seed. Wonder why people don’t take them seriously.197 Pounds - 9 NQ Spots
Favorites
#3 Max Dean, Penn State
It’s music to Nittany Lion faithful ears, though the rest of the conference may not be as thrilled to hear it, but Dean is the third consecutive returning national champ for Penn State and the third consecutive favorite to win a Big Ten title in the upperweight divisions.
Though Dean is ‘only’ ranked #3, due to his rare back-to-back losses this season to Ethan Laird of Rider and Michael Beard of Lehigh, those matches were in early December, and Dean has looked like his normal dominant self ever since.
Max still has concrete hands, deceptively funky defense, and a back-breaking bow-and-arrow bent-leg turn from top that will make you squirm in your seat as you watch. Thankfully for fans of opposing teams, Dean has exhausted his eligibility, and mercifully won’t be around to torture collegiate opponents next season.
Contenders
#10 Silas Allred, Nebraska
#11 Zac Braunagel, Illinois
#12 Jacob Warner, Iowa
#14 Gavin Hoffman, Ohio State
#15 Cam Caffey, Michigan State
#16 Braxton Amos, Wisconsin
#17 Michial Foy, Minnesota
#18 Jaxon Smith, Maryland
There is a decent amount of distance between Dean and the rest of the Big Ten field, despite 197 having been one of the wildest and most competitive divisions this season across the country.
Allred (a great name for one of the Cornhuskers aka Big Red) is having a breakout season in his first year on the varsity squad in Lincoln. Braunagel is in his fourth season as the starter in Champaign, though it's his first year at 197, having spent the previous three years at 184. Braunagel also qualified for the NCAAs the last three years and is looking to climb the All-American podium for the first time after falling one match shy last year.
Warner is having perhaps his most challenging season in Iowa City in his fifth year as the 197-pound Hawkeye starter. He’s already a three-time NCAA All-American, finishing 7th in 2019, 4th in 2021, and runner-up in 2022. Warner was the 5th seed in the canceled 2020 NCAAs. Though he’s certainly capable of another podium run, he’ll have to reverse some results he’s had this season to do so.
Gavin Hoffman had his best season ever last year, placing 6th in Detroit. He’ll have his work cut out for him to repeat in Tulsa, but the way 197 has played out this year, anything is possible.
Caffey, Amos, Foy and Smith are all bunched together with Hoffman, and it wouldn’t be a surprise at all if they finished at Big Tens in a completely different order than that in which they’re currently ranked. Nor would it be a surprise if they all finished in a different order 2 weeks later at NCAAs, either.
Sleepers and Landmines
Nick Willham, Indiana
Billy Janzer, Rutgers
Andrew Davison, Northwestern
Willham is having one of his best years in his fourth season in the Hoosier lineup. Janzer is a two-time national qualifier trying to find the success he had in 2019 as a redshirt freshman down at 184. And Davison transferred from Michigan to Northwestern last season, to join his younger brother’s team. Once in the Wildcat lineup he qualified for the 2022 NCAAs in his fifth year of college competition.
Predictions: 1) Dean, 2) Warner, 3) Allred, 4) Braunagel, 5) Caffey, 6) Hoffman, 7) Amos, 8) Foy, 9) Smith
With 9 qualifying spots, every nationally ranked wrestler will have an opportunity to wrestle to their seed and qualify for the NCAAs. With little margin for error, however, and with a weight class as wacky as 197 has been this season, don’t bet on the bracket being wrestled to chalk.
Kozak predicted the seeds and Spey is predicting the outcome but you would think they would talk to each other. 😂😂.They are predicting Dean 1 and Warner 2. They are also predicting Dean to be the 1 seed and Warner to be the 4 seed. Wonder why people don’t take them seriously.
Nice to see them on top of their stuff as usual. 🙄Willie answered a post on NN about the Teske situation. Iowa coaching staff didn’t submit him for a ranking because they didn’t realize he was qualified to be ranked. Thus the B1G has nine allocations at 133 instead of the ten deserved.
Not quite.Willie posted that evidently someone (NCAA or NWCA) screwed up as Teske wasn’t listed as an eligible candidate in the Coaches Rankings even though he met the minimum match criteria.
I didn't read the above link that way.Iowa coaching staff didn’t submit him for a ranking because they didn’t realize he was qualified to be ranked.
“I spoke to Morningstar almost immediately after allocations were released and told him Teske wasn't ranked and that Schriever was listed as the nominee. He said Schriever wasn't eligible for a ranking b/c he hadn't wrestled in 30 days and that he didn't think Teske was eligible either.”I didn't read the above link that way.
Do we even know Morningstar is responsible for Iowa's input that supports the Coaches' Ranking?
Willie wrote Morningstar didn't think either Cullen or Brody were eligible for the Coaches' Ranking. But Willie also wrote Cullen was listed as Iowa's 133 for it.
The basis (e.g., someone told Morningstar, there is some system of NCAA records that Morningstar checked at some point from which he concluded, he, himself, misunderstood the criteria, he was basing his conclusion on faulty data understanding the criteria) for Morningstar's thinking was unstated.
Plus, the 30-day thing regarding Schriever is moot. At a record of 7-5 (at 133), he doesn’t qualify for an RPI and is way below the Winning Percentage threshold of 0.700. No matter how you cut it, he was not earning a pre-allocation bid.“I spoke to Morningstar almost immediately after allocations were released and told him Teske wasn't ranked and that Schriever was listed as the nominee. He said Schriever wasn't eligible for a ranking b/c he hadn't wrestled in 30 days and that he didn't think Teske was eligible either.”
- Schriever could only be listed as the nominee if Iowa submitted Schriever instead of Teske. Why would they do that? They didn’t think either was eligible.
“Just about every college coach I talked to said I should put the Iowa staff on blast for not doing what they needed to do.”
- Why would every other coach Willie talked to want the Iowa staff to be called out for “not doing what they needed to do” if the mistake wasn’t Iowa’s?
He (Ryan), is not all of Iowa. He did not indicate he was speaking for all of Iowa's wrestling staff. That's all I'm saying.He said Schriever wasn't eligible for a ranking b/c he hadn't wrestled in 30 days and that he didn't think Teske was eligible either.”
I agree. Iowa (not the NCAA or NWCA) were responsible for the B1G not receiving an additional 133 allocation.Why would they do that? They didn’t think either was eligible.
At a record of 7-5 (at 133), he doesn’t qualify for an RPI and is way below the Winning Percentage threshold of 0.700. No matter how you cut it, he was not earning a pre-allocation bid.