Do you know why they do it?They are?
Do you know why they do it?They are?
No doubt.Shameful we need laws to keep the kids away from the freaks and pedos
It doesn't. And the questions posed to you are about children in the presence of people dressing as the opposite sex. But you won't answer because you're a coward.We’re talking about minors here, Riley. Try to keep up. This entire thread has nothing to do with keeping adults away from trans. You’ve got to be acting right? You can’t be this oblivious.
Yet, children have access to that clip, and you're perfectly ok with that.Maybe. At least they were messing with children.
No.are you stupid?
So every performance by someone dressed as the opposite sex is "deviant sexual behavior"? Is that your position?If they aren’t the same, the drag people are simply doing it for deviant sexual behavior.
You didn't. You're incapable.I just did, bud. lol 😆
My whole point has been children in the presence of sexually driven trans shows. I’ve made my stand very clear. In fact, you actually agreed with me. Now I can’t figure out what exactly your goal is…other than make yourself look like an angry lunatic.It doesn't. And the questions posed to you are about children in the presence of people dressing as the opposite sex. But you won't answer because you're a coward.
Freudian slip?Maybe. At least they were messing with children.
At least 90% of them, yes. Even drag performers have stated that.So every performance by someone dressed as the opposite sex is "deviant sexual behavior"? Is that your position?
Do you?Do you know why they do it?
Scared?No.
Can you answer my question now or are you still scared?
Whatever I am, at least I’m not you 🤣Freudian slip?
You're a special kind of bigoted idiot.
Bud, I don’t know what they were performing. But it didn’t involve minors so it’s really none of my business.Yet, children have access to that clip, and you're perfectly ok with that.
Finally, we're getting somewhere.
You just admitted that trump and rudy were exercising their sexual deviancy. You stated earlier that you're perfectly ok with that clip. It's a clip that children have access to, and in no way are banned from.
Why are you ok with sexual deviants when they're republican politicians, but otherwise you're opposed to it?
You've avoided the rest of the issue. Non-sexual shows with people dressed as the opposite sex. Why should those be subjected to felony charges.My whole point has been children in the presence of sexually driven trans shows. I’ve made my stand very clear. In fact, you actually agreed with me. Now I can’t figure out what exactly your goal is…other than make yourself look like an angry lunatic.
Do you?Do you?
LOL - link? Where do you come up with this shit.At least 90% of them, yes. Even drag performers have stated that.
I didn’t say they should be. But sexually charged ones with children in the audience, absolutely.You've avoided the rest of the issue. Non-sexual shows with people dressed as the opposite sex. Why should those be subjected to felony charges.
You agreed that trump and rudy were exercising their sexual deviancy. You also said you were perfectly ok with that.Bud, I don’t know what they were performing. But it didn’t involve minors so it’s really none of my business.
That's for certain. Thank goodness.Whatever I am, at least I’m not you 🤣
I don't.Do you?
What is the goal or purpose of drag queens shows for children?
Why are you assuming they are dressed as the opposite sex?You've avoided the rest of the issue. Non-sexual shows with people dressed as the opposite sex. Why should those be subjected to felony charges.
You will avoid this direct question yet again.
You want drag queens entertaining children?I don't.
To entertain children.
You've avoided the question for hours now. So are you finally saying there shouldn't be a law that lumps all shows with someone dressing as the opposite sex in with those that are secually explicit? And shouldn't have felony charges?I didn’t say they should be. But sexually charged ones with children in the audience, absolutely.
Sure.LOL - link? Where do you come up with this shit.
At least that was an answer.
Because that's what the topic is.Why are you assuming they are dressed as the opposite sex?
Why are you dismissing trannies as women?
Sure. Why not?You want drag queens entertaining children?
What a ridiculous argument. Everything on video is available to children to watch. Tons of adult material is. I would prefer it wasn’t, but I don’t have the power to make that happen myself.You agreed that trump and rudy were exercising their sexual deviancy. You also said you were perfectly ok with that.
That clip is available for children to watch.
Why are you ok with that?
So you’re wrongBecause that's what the topic is.
I'm not. Nor as those who are men.
You're not bright.
I’m saying until the trans community disavows the sexually charged ones directed at children, they will always be lumped together.You've avoided the question for hours now. So are you finally saying there shouldn't be a law that lumps all shows with someone dressing as the opposite sex in with those that are secually explicit? And shouldn't have felony charges?
Do you think the clip of Rudy dressed in drag, along with trump flirting with him should be age-restricted on the internet, the same way porn is?What a ridiculous argument. Everything on video is available to children to watch. Tons of adult material is. I would prefer it wasn’t, but I don’t have the power to make that happen myself.
BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA - you can't back up your claim and you link this? JFC.Sure.
Here’s some quotes.
This is grooming, straight up.
- We propose that DQSH offers a particular kind of queer framework – what we call drag pedagogy – for teaching and learning that extends beyond traditional approaches to LGBT curricular inclusion.
- We emphasize that drag pedagogy … artfully invites children into building communities that are more hospitable to queer knowledge and experience.
- We are guided by the following question: what might Drag Queen Story Hour offer educators as a way of bringing queer ways of knowing and being into the education of young children? [emphasis in original]
- DQSH creates spaces for young children and families to immerse themselves in LGBT-themed stories, and does so in ways that seem to genuinely reflect queer ways of being and relating.
- DQSH grew from queer author Michelle Tea’s personal desire to connect her toddler with queer culture.
- At many events, organizers invite kids to create their own drag name…
- We argue that [DQSH] creates a pathway into the imaginative, messy, and rule-breaking aspects of drag for children without necessarily watering down queer cultures.
- Though there are many layers to drag, its most immediate process of denaturalizing gender and culture happens on the surface…
- While drag has some conventions, it ultimately has no rules – its defining quality is often to break as many rules as possible. Thus drag can be thought of as a kind of queer praxis that may be especially well-suited to early childhood education.
- Many elements of DQSH are common to early childhood schooling: bright colors, music, art, and imaginative play. … What is different though, is that the teacher is a drag queen. … She encourages children to think for themselves and even to break the rules. …She is a queer
- Building in part from queer theory and trans studies, queer and trans pedagogies seek to actively destabilize the normative function of schooling through transformative education.
- In turn, drag queen teachers have much to learn from interactions with children: many queens reflect that DQSH allows them to build relationships with young people that otherwise would not be possible.
WTF are you talking about?So you’re wrong
So I’m guessing you didn’t read the article. Gotcha…BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA - you can't back up your claim and you link this? JFC.
You are exactly who Trump and Musk love.
lmaoSure. Why not?
I certainly have no problem with that. Lots of things on the internet could use an age restriction.Do you think the clip of Rudy dressed in drag, along with trump flirting with him should be age-restricted on the internet, the same way porn is?
Why? And you support it being a felony for a child to be in the presence of someone dressed as the opposiute sex?I’m saying until the trans community disavows the sexually charged ones directed at children, they will always be lumped together.
They will disavow nothing, they’re pervertsI’m saying until the trans community disavows the sexually charged ones directed at children, they will always be lumped together.
Check your sources.So I’m guessing you didn’t read the article. Gotcha…