Oh my bad. I thought his hand tipped the ball on his second jump.Originally posted by SCHawkFan:
Originally posted by crHawkeye92:
Fleming with a huge tip in there
He did not get the tip.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Hansen? Are you kidding? You don't play 9 years in the NBA as a 2 guard if you don't have good athleticism and quickness. Sure, he didn't have I. Thomas quickness but Hansen was also 6'6". My brother played against him in the state final and AAU ball and said Hansen was by far the best player, best athlete he ever played against. He was simply unguardable in high school. If you put a smaller guy on him he would post that player up and score inside, or he'd shoot over them. Put a bigger guy on him and he was too quick for them.Originally posted by DanL53:
Originally posted by buttermypancakes:
JO didn't play his role very well, we can all agree on that. He just needed to space the floor, shoot with confidence when the offense gets him open shots, play unselfishly and find open teammates.Originally posted by PhantomFlyer:
So, you meant he'll play the role of a player who's too slow, lacks athleticism, plays weak D, and can't hit his shots (and lacks confidence in his shots). Good, I was concerned we didn't have anyone who could take over Josh's role.Originally posted by buttermypancakes:
I don't follow recruiting close enough to get into ranking but unless Reeves has shown alot more on the AAU circuit I have know idea how he is so high. He is a very good athlete with little basketball skill or feel at this point. If Josh Ogelsby can be a 4 star, Fleming has got to be close.Originally posted by clickhere 01:
Allow me to guess:Originally posted by DanL53:
Discussion.
Why is it Andrew Fleming is ranked so low?
Unranked 3* by Rivals
Evaluated a 78 (3 star) by ESPN. Meanwhile Josh Reaves is ranked an 84 (4 star)
Scout has him as a two star.
247 has Fleming OUT of their top 247.
Fleming is listed by Verbal commits as having had 27 offers including the likes of Gonzaga, Iowa State, Ohio State, Stanford...
What is it we're seeing that college basketball coaches saw? What is different between Fleming, ranked by ESPN as the 52nd best shooting guard in the country, and Reaves, ranked by ESPN as the 23rd best shooting guard in the country?
1. ESPN and those scouting services hate Iowa, therefore rate their players lower. (conspiracy)
2. Fleming has less than average lateral quickness and could struggle defending at this level.
3. His release point is low and also shoots a set shot mainly.(in games I've watched) Those two things and having marginal quickness could make it difficult for him to get a shot off.
4. I'm sure you'll go with #1
Rankings tend to weigh a higher ceiling more than great basketball IQ and feel for the game. The great thing is Fleming is a role player anyway and he is very good at what he does from what I have seen. A player like Reeves has a greater "potential" to be a star but could also be a bust. Fleming IMO will fill that JO role at the very least and probably will be much better. Fleming has already accepted a role is high school so it should be an easy transition.
It's very hard to have 5 ball dominant players on the court at the same time and still have good team chemistry. If people are just realistic with what Fleming is going to be asked to do at Iowa, I think he could be great but I don't ever see him being someone that creates off the dribble or that the offense runs through. If Iowa had 4 Andrew Fleming type players coming in I would be concerned, but they have guys with different skill sets that will fill their roles. Moss,Williams,Wagner and even Hutton have shown they all have some ability off the dribble at their position. Fleming fills that spot up shooter role along with Elingson.
This post was edited on 4/4 8:44 AM by buttermypancakes
I'm very curious to see what kind of player Fleming is when placed on a team that values ball movement and motion to create open shots. He needs to be on a team like that.
Again, I believe there is a reason that seventeen college coaches offered Fleming a scholarship. And I'll add that Oak Hill's coach, Kevin Smith, who has been seeking out players to transfer to his program for 30 years, saw something in Andrew Fleming that was worth an offer.
And IF Coach Smith made a mistake? It is kind of odd that Fleming is the first guy in off the bench and for a big part of the season replaced Josh Reaves in the starting lineup.
Fleming's success hangs on one thing. His three point shooting percentage. He reminds me of Josh Oglesby AND Bobby Hanson. How's that for a range of possible results?
Last thing, as to his quicks and his defense. Hansen wasn't a burner either but he gutted out some amazing defense. Magic Johnson hated being defended by him. (Pros. Jazz vs Lakers in the playoffs. Hansen got a chip on his shoulder about "King Magic" as he called him never being called for a foul or traveling. That series Bobby gave Magic fits. It was beautiful.)
Originally posted by PhantomFlyer:
Hansen? Are you kidding? You don't play 9 years in the NBA as a 2 guard if you don't have good athleticism and quickness. Sure, he didn't have I. Thomas quickness but Hansen was also 6'6". My brother played against him in the state final and AAU ball and said Hansen was by far the best player, best athlete he ever played against. He was simply unguardable in high school. If you put a smaller guy on him he would post that player up and score inside, or he'd shoot over them. Put a bigger guy on him and he was too quick for them.
This is why Hansen could play defense against Magic, he was a big guard with some quicks. You are greatly underselling Hansen's athleticism.
As usual we disagree. Hansen was a hustle guy.
You can be a "hustle guy" and still be a very good athlete and quick. Hansen was both, there's not even a question about it. You simply never saw Hansen play high school ball if you think he was strictly a hustle guy. He didn't dominate the state of Iowa basketball because he was a "hustle guy". Little Lick's do that. Hansen was the best athlete (from the late 70's forward) to play Iowa high school ball until Ricky Davis came along. Rodman is an example.Originally posted by DanL53:
Originally posted by PhantomFlyer:
Hansen? Are you kidding? You don't play 9 years in the NBA as a 2 guard if you don't have good athleticism and quickness. Sure, he didn't have I. Thomas quickness but Hansen was also 6'6". My brother played against him in the state final and AAU ball and said Hansen was by far the best player, best athlete he ever played against. He was simply unguardable in high school. If you put a smaller guy on him he would post that player up and score inside, or he'd shoot over them. Put a bigger guy on him and he was too quick for them.
This is why Hansen could play defense against Magic, he was a big guard with some quicks. You are greatly underselling Hansen's athleticism.
As usual we disagree. Hansen was a hustle guy.
Originally posted by PhantomFlyer:
You can be a "hustle guy" and still be a very good athlete and quick. Hansen was both, there's not even a question about it. You simply never saw Hansen play high school ball if you think he was strictly a hustle guy. He didn't dominate the state of Iowa basketball because he was a "hustle guy". Little Lick's do that. Hansen was the best athlete (from the late 70's forward) to play Iowa high school ball until Ricky Davis came along. Rodman is an example.Originally posted by DanL53:
Originally posted by PhantomFlyer:
Hansen? Are you kidding? You don't play 9 years in the NBA as a 2 guard if you don't have good athleticism and quickness. Sure, he didn't have I. Thomas quickness but Hansen was also 6'6". My brother played against him in the state final and AAU ball and said Hansen was by far the best player, best athlete he ever played against. He was simply unguardable in high school. If you put a smaller guy on him he would post that player up and score inside, or he'd shoot over them. Put a bigger guy on him and he was too quick for them.
This is why Hansen could play defense against Magic, he was a big guard with some quicks. You are greatly underselling Hansen's athleticism.
As usual we disagree. Hansen was a hustle guy.
There is no reason to continue this, as I said, we disagree. Perhaps in High School you might have had a case that Hansen was quick. But in college and the pros Hansen made his living getting the most out of his skills. He was one of those high motor guys that just keeps at it.
This is why I get tired of you, "there's not even a question about it", hey...I don't have as high an opinion of your views as you have. I don't think anyone could. Get over yourself. I have no problem conversing but I don't need a lecture.
Hansen had good size & skills, and was tough as nails. By B1G or NBA standards, he was not very athletic. Fleming has similar size and seems to also have some skills. If he has Bobby Hansen's grit and competitiveness, he will be a very good player for the Hawks. I think he probably has a lot of work to do on the defensive end.Originally posted by DanL53:
Originally posted by PhantomFlyer:
You can be a "hustle guy" and still be a very good athlete and quick. Hansen was both, there's not even a question about it. You simply never saw Hansen play high school ball if you think he was strictly a hustle guy. He didn't dominate the state of Iowa basketball because he was a "hustle guy". Little Lick's do that. Hansen was the best athlete (from the late 70's forward) to play Iowa high school ball until Ricky Davis came along. Rodman is an example.Originally posted by DanL53:
Originally posted by PhantomFlyer:
Hansen? Are you kidding? You don't play 9 years in the NBA as a 2 guard if you don't have good athleticism and quickness. Sure, he didn't have I. Thomas quickness but Hansen was also 6'6". My brother played against him in the state final and AAU ball and said Hansen was by far the best player, best athlete he ever played against. He was simply unguardable in high school. If you put a smaller guy on him he would post that player up and score inside, or he'd shoot over them. Put a bigger guy on him and he was too quick for them.
This is why Hansen could play defense against Magic, he was a big guard with some quicks. You are greatly underselling Hansen's athleticism.
As usual we disagree. Hansen was a hustle guy.
There is no reason to continue this, as I said, we disagree. Perhaps in High School you might have had a case that Hansen was quick. But in college and the pros Hansen made his living getting the most out of his skills. He was one of those high motor guys that just keeps at it.
This is why I get tired of you, "there's not even a question about it", hey...I don't have as high an opinion of your views as you have. I don't think anyone could. Get over yourself. I have no problem conversing but I don't need a lecture.
There's the Iowa vs Louisville Final Four game. People can decide for themselves about Hansen's speed. I guess even bringing up a wide range like Andrew Fleming could be between a Josh Oglesby and a Bobby Hansen was too much to let go by without some kind of corrective action.Originally posted by HoustonREDHawk:
Hansen had good size & skills, and was tough as nails. By B1G or NBA standards, he was not very athletic. Fleming has similar size and seems to also have some skills. If he has Bobby Hansen's grit and competitiveness, he will be a very good player for the Hawks. I think he probably has a lot of work to do on the defensive end.Originally posted by DanL53:
Originally posted by PhantomFlyer:
You can be a "hustle guy" and still be a very good athlete and quick. Hansen was both, there's not even a question about it. You simply never saw Hansen play high school ball if you think he was strictly a hustle guy. He didn't dominate the state of Iowa basketball because he was a "hustle guy". Little Lick's do that. Hansen was the best athlete (from the late 70's forward) to play Iowa high school ball until Ricky Davis came along. Rodman is an example.Originally posted by DanL53:
Originally posted by PhantomFlyer:
Hansen? Are you kidding? You don't play 9 years in the NBA as a 2 guard if you don't have good athleticism and quickness. Sure, he didn't have I. Thomas quickness but Hansen was also 6'6". My brother played against him in the state final and AAU ball and said Hansen was by far the best player, best athlete he ever played against. He was simply unguardable in high school. If you put a smaller guy on him he would post that player up and score inside, or he'd shoot over them. Put a bigger guy on him and he was too quick for them.
This is why Hansen could play defense against Magic, he was a big guard with some quicks. You are greatly underselling Hansen's athleticism.
As usual we disagree. Hansen was a hustle guy.
There is no reason to continue this, as I said, we disagree. Perhaps in High School you might have had a case that Hansen was quick. But in college and the pros Hansen made his living getting the most out of his skills. He was one of those high motor guys that just keeps at it.
This is why I get tired of you, "there's not even a question about it", hey...I don't have as high an opinion of your views as you have. I don't think anyone could. Get over yourself. I have no problem conversing but I don't need a lecture.
Thanks
Instead of complaining to Phantom, I should have just done this.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Iowa+versus+Louisville+basketball&FORM=HDRSC3#view=detail&mid=565AAE2B2E4CD6E4B46F565AAE2B2E4CD6E4B46F