...for anyone that remembers. I wasn't old enough to understand. What happened with Payne that he seemingly regressed (or did he?) from his freshmen year?
...for anyone that remembers. I wasn't old enough to understand. What happened with Payne that he seemingly regressed (or did he?) from his freshmen year?
And, Greg Stokes was a big boy?This is just my opinion, but Payne was slight of build and the Big Ten was entering an era when hard bodied players (what I call thugs) we're becoming prevalent.
I never realized he was almost 7 foot and under 200 lbs. That explains a lot.This is just my opinion, but Payne was slight of build and the Big Ten was entering an era when hard bodied players (what I call thugs) we're becoming prevalent.
And, Greg Stokes was a big boy?
Stokes and Payne were examples of inflated height listings. If I remember correctly, Stokes' pro day height measurement was 6'7 & 1/2". That's why he didn't really stick in the NBA.: his talents were those of a center in a tweener forward's body.By comparison, yes.
6'11, 195 compared to 6'10", 220. And as to Payne having a not so good career, he was good enough to be drafted 57th in the NBA. Stokes was drafted 33rd.
And yeah, I looked it up. My memory isn't THAT good. I've always thought they kind of missed the best years they could have had, their junior and senior years. Raveling showed up and game coaching, imo, went downhill.
Stokes and Payne were examples of inflated height listings. If I remember correctly, Stokes' pro day height measurement was 6'7 & 1/2". That's why he didn't really stick in the NBA.: his talents were those of a center in a tweener forward's body.
...for anyone that remembers. I wasn't old enough to understand. What happened with Payne that he seemingly regressed (or did he?) from his freshmen year?
The way I remember it, both Stokes and Payne were skilled players. Stokes had an aggressive mental make up and Michael Payne's was more passive. Pure and simple that was the difference. They both were very good players but Payne didn't have an aggressive nature.
I don't recall that but I suppose. I think maybe when one is drafted 33 there's a chance you're playing on Teflon.
I also think I got a clue to the problem when I listened to him give a radio interview years ago. Right about the time Davis was the new coach. The question was, Greg had played for both Olson and Raveling and was there much difference. He was very nice about how he put it, but Olson worked players asses off, and Raveling was a lot more fun and he liked Raveling's way better.
Tell you what. Street and Smith's had TWO Preseason All Americans from Iowa the year Raveling showed up. That's how good Payne and Stoke had been as sophomores. As I recall that was a ten guy team! You gotta remember we also had a guy nearly lost to obscurity by the name of Brad Lohaus had he not redshirted a year under Raveling, who never knew what to do with him. Dr. Tom rescued Brad clear into the NBA.
And Craig Anderson was, as hard as he tried, a fake/real I don't care about the height, 6'7" slow footed tweener center getting his butt kicked every night trying to play wing forward! Again, that was Raveling's first year and all that but I'll never understand the lineups, nor stalling when we were behind at Indiana, nor bringing Johnny Fort in when we were down by eight with under four to go like...SURPRISE!!!... I mean, what the heck was that? The Hail Mary of basketball schemes? (I don't really remember how far behind we were or what the tie was on the clock but it was freagin, with that team, if he's THAT good play him at the wing spot you Moron!!!)
I don't doubt the height thing but it is 1) Barefoot or shoes. 2) So common as to believe everybody is 2 inches shorter than listed. I won't say it wasn't a reason. Well, yeah, with all respect...that wasn't the ONLY reason.
That's why when we see McCaffery doing a red faced Irish jig in front of his players, like he did almost violently with Marble...it really is for their own good.
I don't recall Iowa stalling against Indiana. Bob Knight did it to George, and only George, in both games. I believe the shot clock came into play 1 or 2 years laterI don't recall that but I suppose. I think maybe when one is drafted 33 there's a chance you're playing on Teflon.
I also think I got a clue to the problem when I listened to him give a radio interview years ago. Right about the time Davis was the new coach. The question was, Greg had played for both Olson and Raveling and was there much difference. He was very nice about how he put it, but Olson worked players asses off, and Raveling was a lot more fun and he liked Raveling's way better.
Tell you what. Street and Smith's had TWO Preseason All Americans from Iowa the year Raveling showed up. That's how good Payne and Stoke had been as sophomores. As I recall that was a ten guy team! You gotta remember we also had a guy nearly lost to obscurity by the name of Brad Lohaus had he not redshirted a year under Raveling, who never knew what to do with him. Dr. Tom rescued Brad clear into the NBA.
And Craig Anderson was, as hard as he tried, a fake/real I don't care about the height, 6'7" slow footed tweener center getting his butt kicked every night trying to play wing forward! Again, that was Raveling's first year and all that but I'll never understand the lineups, nor stalling when we were behind at Indiana, nor bringing Johnny Fort in when we were down by eight with under four to go like...SURPRISE!!!... I mean, what the heck was that? The Hail Mary of basketball schemes? (I don't really remember how far behind we were or what the tie was on the clock but it was freagin, with that team, if he's THAT good play him at the wing spot you Moron!!!)
I don't doubt the height thing but it is 1) Barefoot or shoes. 2) So common as to believe everybody is 2 inches shorter than listed. I won't say it wasn't a reason. Well, yeah, with all respect...that wasn't the ONLY reason.
That's why when we see McCaffery doing a red faced Irish jig in front of his players, like he did almost violently with Marble...it really is for their own good.
I don't recall Iowa stalling against Indiana. Bob Knight did it to George, and only George, in both games. I believe the shot clock came into play 1 or 2 years later
I remember my old man losing his shit and throwing a boot or something at the wall.Wasn't one of those a game where IU held it for most of the last 8 minutes or so? I seem to remember one like that.
Wasn't one of those a game where IU held it for most of the last 8 minutes or so? I seem to remember one like that.
DanL53, great Johnny Fort (from Gary, IN) reference!! Hadn't heard his name in years. And don't forget his big brother, Jeff, founder of the El Rukns.
The game IU held the ball late vs Iowa was in '84. Some familiar names, Steve Alford, Marty Simmons, Dan Dakich handled the ball a lot down the stretch.
He was moved from center to forward....for anyone that remembers. I wasn't old enough to understand. What happened with Payne that he seemingly regressed (or did he?) from his freshmen year?
No Dakich game one...and freakin Uve Blab. Thanks for posting!For the kids out there, here's the old box scores from the newspaper in 1984. First one is game in Bloomington, second one is in Iowa City.
![]()
![]()
I remember the year after Magic left MSU, the first half was something like 8-6 Iowa at the Fieldhouse. MSU held the ball darn near the entire half.
Heathcoat did the right thing though, game wound up going to OT. Something like 44-39 Iowa. Kept a drastically undermanned MSU in the game.
Yep, Lute refused to come out and guard, and Jud knew he didn't have the horses to compete 40 minutes. Pretty exciting stuff
The Hawks were great Lester's last two years, if they had the lead with less than 10 min to go. You couldn't take it away from Ronnie, and he and the other guards made FTs in the clutch. That is a big reason why Iowa shared the B1G title Ronnie's junior year, but I am glad the shot clock was implemented.
Jay VincentI for one had a great time at that game. I sat close enough to the floor that I could have hit Heathcote with popcorn while he was being interviewed before the game. He gave no indication of his plans. Plans made because he had one guy who was talented and foul prone...had a brother that played for Michigan State later on, but I can't recall the name
maybe on offense..as fans we have a tendency to see offense & disregard defense. Payne was not passive on defense. I can recall Lute not being as happy with Stokes effort on the defensive end. I'm sure some of it was a form of motivation & 'Stoker' got better which put him on those All-B1G 1st & 2nd Teams.
Payne was 2nd Team All-B1G as a freshman because of his defense. Stokes was a sub and his back up as a freshman.
I would think had the Big Ten had an all-defensive team back then - Payne would have made a few of them.
All you need to do is look at the shooting percentages above for our guards on this team and realize why we struggled. Wasn't that also one of the first years of the 3 point shot? (I think 82-83 was the first in the Big 10?) Todd Berkenpas never really became the sharp shooter he was projected to be coming out as Iowa's first Mr Basketball. IIRC, Carfino put up a fair amount of 3's, but I'm guessing as a whole we were abysmal.For the kids out there, here's the old box scores from the newspaper in 1984. First one is game in Bloomington, second one is in Iowa City.
![]()
![]()
Funny, I thought I heard a quote from Raveling that Iowa was greatly undermanned compared to the other contenders in the Big Ten. Something like, Iowa was going to war with pistols against teams that had automatic weapons. I am sure that Iowa was ranked in the top 10 nationally, maybe even top 5, entering Raveling's first year, but they finished 6-12 in conference. I don't remember any serious injuries, just remarkable underachievement.All you need to do is look at the shooting percentages above for our guards on this team and realize why we struggled. Wasn't that also one of the first years of the 3 point shot? (I think 82-83 was the first in the Big 10?) Todd Berkenpas never really became the sharp shooter he was projected to be coming out as Iowa's first Mr Basketball. IIRC, Carfino put up a fair amount of 3's, but I'm guessing as a whole we were abysmal.
The 3 pointer was still conference specific until the NCAA adopted it in ~ 86-87 (?) and it wasn't even kept as a separate stat line until then.
I remember hearing Raveling (at an event in Ottumwa) before his first season say that he thought we should win not only a Big 10 title but contend for an NCAA title. I also heard that Stokes was not a fan of Lute.
I believe Payne's high school teammate was Illinois player of the year, Wasn't He? Bruce Douglas was his name I think.Iowa benefited greatly from Raveling's recruiting after he left, but he screwed the pooch with the team that Lute left behind. Iowa was ranked in the top 10 preseason in George's first year, but didn't come close to finishing .500 in conference. Great recruiter, but lousy game and development coach.
Payne was player of the year in Illinois and Stokes in Ohio coming out of HS, so expectations were through the roof. Had Lute stayed, I am sure there would have been MUCH more success. They also had Lohaus on the team their sr year, but couldn't figure out how to use them. Payne and Stokes were both more like 6'9", but Payne had a very long neck, so his body was more like a 6'7" player. Fort's failure as a top PG also contributed to the lack of production. Another disappointment from Lute's departure...