Republican flees after DOGE question from a vet…
- Thread starter Tom Paris
- Start date
Yep. They’re cowards. All of them who have enabled Trump are spineless pieces of shit.
I’m glad history will not be kind.
I’m glad history will not be kind.
Pa, has 2 new R congressmen in swing districts and neither one will talk to the public, think they went into hiding. Will not answer any questions.
He was a Captain in the Army Reserves. What a chickenshit.
How spineless Americans have become. Thanks Trump
They’re terrified of all voters.
MAGA will threaten them.
Elmo will primary them.
The sane will question them.
They’ve done this to themselves.
MAGA will threaten them.
Elmo will primary them.
The sane will question them.
They’ve done this to themselves.
When these guys dip out, somebody should have the music from that NFL recap show and just have the Berman “whoooop” sound he makes when somebody gets juked.
“God bless America” and heads straight for the door.
Democrats in the House released this data: the number fired is approximately 15% of total
Vets Fired
The numbers i saw was 6000 + , and that just the numbers that was reported earlier. Some states didn't have all those fired and late sending to the govt,
Last edited:
Not defending the cuts, but veterans are disproportionately over represented as a percent of the federal workforce...
piece of shit coward loser. **** the republicans.
Are you that clueless? Thanks vets for putting your life on the line but get to the back of the line for fed jobs.
Why shouldn't they get first Crack?
35% of the Federal work force are vets. They retire from the military , to young to collect retirement and find a a job in the fed govt.
That's not what he said.
Btw, I can think of a thousand ways to serve our country.
According to the graph linked, they've been laid off in the exact proportions they represented in each agency...
Sorry you can't have a discussion or read a table linked in the post, bitch...
My dad dropped out of HS to join at 17 in WWII. You didn't make money in the service back then, either.
He implied it. What other ways are there? They're all axed.
You keep fighting the good fight, buddy.
Challenge the electorate and don’t question the behavior of the elected representative.
You’re truly doing the lord’s work
I did not. Stands to reason ( as shown in the link if you wanted to be informed ) that the % of vets laid off is roughly = to the % employed...
SCREW YOU, They take the Civil Service exam and take their experience to the govt. no police record, not on drugs, and are educated.
Last edited:
When I served in the 80's you didn't make money as well. What exactly is your point? Vets get a leg up for serving and putting thier life on the line, potentially? Shouldn't get a leg up?
Vets shouldn’t have to pay for jackshit in this country. They should get the same medical care and retirement income members of Congress get. Republican or Democrat. I don’t care. There should be no arguments about taking care of the people who protect us.
Republicans want vets to become homeless. Easier than having to explain to rich people why they didn't get tax cuts for their tenth house.
True statement
Veteran Status
Individuals who have served in the uniformed military service constituted a considerable segment of the federal workforce. At the end of fiscal 2023, 30% of federal employees were veterans compared to 5% of the total employed U.S. civilian labor force. In the same year, 25% of new federal hires were veterans.
A Profile of the 2023 Federal Workforce
A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization working towards effective government for the American people.
ourpublicservice.org
And what is wrong with that?True statement
Veteran Status
Individuals who have served in the uniformed military service constituted a considerable segment of the federal workforce. At the end of fiscal 2023, 30% of federal employees were veterans compared to 5% of the total employed U.S. civilian labor force. In the same year, 25% of new federal hires were veterans.
A Profile of the 2023 Federal Workforce
A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization working towards effective government for the American people.
Are they DEI hires too?True statement
Veteran Status
Individuals who have served in the uniformed military service constituted a considerable segment of the federal workforce. At the end of fiscal 2023, 30% of federal employees were veterans compared to 5% of the total employed U.S. civilian labor force. In the same year, 25% of new federal hires were veterans.
A Profile of the 2023 Federal Workforce
A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization working towards effective government for the American people.
Do you support the response by the Senator?
Both sides thinks he's onto something here...True statement
Veteran Status
Individuals who have served in the uniformed military service constituted a considerable segment of the federal workforce. At the end of fiscal 2023, 30% of federal employees were veterans compared to 5% of the total employed U.S. civilian labor force. In the same year, 25% of new federal hires were veterans.
A Profile of the 2023 Federal Workforce
A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization working towards effective government for the American people.
To confirm, if all of the people let go by the federal government were non veterans, would everyone then be OK with the cuts?
Also, to answer the inevitable second question, are there any jobs in the federal government that should be cut, or is it running at max efficiency?
Also, to answer the inevitable second question, are there any jobs in the federal government that should be cut, or is it running at max efficiency?
True, roughly about 30%. That doesn't change the fact that it could be a hot-button issue among their base, so it would have been prudent to keep that number as low as possible while still making cuts.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
I de-committed, and nobody wanted to be my friend. (Kadyn Proctor)- Latest: LeftyNovotny
-