Do you support the response by the Senator?
I didn't hear one. He should have stayed.
Do you support the response by the Senator?
What an absolute fecking pussy….
You weren't listening then.I didn't hear one. He should have stayed.
Haven’t you heard, these are all George Soros paid actors.
Thanks. It’s hard to even bring up facts around this place without being accused of a MAGA leaning bastard.True statement
Veteran Status
Individuals who have served in the uniformed military service constituted a considerable segment of the federal workforce. At the end of fiscal 2023, 30% of federal employees were veterans compared to 5% of the total employed U.S. civilian labor force. In the same year, 25% of new federal hires were veterans.
![]()
A Profile of the 2023 Federal Workforce
A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization working towards effective government for the American people.ourpublicservice.org
Sorry you are misconstruing what I posted off a site linked by @NoleinATL ...It is codified that veterans have preference.
I'm sorry to see @jamesvanderwulf going where he is going
Do you condone the response from the Senator? That is what this thread is about.Thanks. It’s hard to even bring up facts around this place without being accused of a MAGA leaning bastard.
Sorry you are misconstruing what I posted off a site linked by @NoleinATL ...
GOP has really proven itself to be the party of Bitch Boys.What an absolute fecking pussy….
Voters, minus true MAGA, aren't going to forget this.
I fully expect a significant number of incumbent Republicans won't be running for reelection in purple districts in 2026.
Hell, those in Red districts might not.
The only question is how much damage President Musk does before then?
Actually I couldn't understand a word he said in the video. Looked like he evaded the question. My comment was factual in nature as related to the table @NoleinATL linked. To which he responded to me " TRUE, " then went on to say:Do you condone the response from the Senator? That is what this thread is about.
That's a lot of babbling to avoid the question.Actually I couldn't understand a word he said in the video. Looked like he evaded the question. My comment was factual in nature as related to the table @NoleinATL linked. To which he replied TRUE, then went on to say:
" it could be a hot-button issue among their base, so it would have been prudent to keep that number as low as possible while still making cuts. " Also TRUE. I agree it could be a hot button issue among their base. Lots of things are hot button issues for the Democrats...
And, yet, here you are white knighting for him and desperately attempting to derail the thread.I didn't hear one. He should have stayed.
Nothing. I benefited from it.And what is wrong with that?
Since you trying to grasp at straws here and coming up empty, answer this question. Under which party ( hint Clinton/Obama ) was the D of D's budget cut 12 of 16 years not only in real numbers but as a % of GDP? Since we know from the table ( the one linked ) that Vets make up 46% of those jobs, exactly who do you guess was hurt most in '93 -'01 and '09 - '17? Maybe Vets?That's a lot of babbling to avoid the question.
No. Just sayin it’s a true statement..Both sides thinks he's onto something here...
Yep.Thanks. It’s hard to even bring up facts around this place without being accused of a MAGA leaning bastard.
You could see this freight train coming a mile away. The oligarchs see rural people as subhuman. Here’s what people don’t realize, there is no voting our way out of this. Just wait and see.LOL, white people in rural America are getting angry. This isn't what they were promised.
This further cements my opinion that the GOP treats veterans, and cops, like useful props. Great when they line up behind you for some flag waiving, but terribly inconvenient and awfully noisy when you are f***ing them over.
WTF does that have to do with the question posed to you?Since you trying to grasp at straws here and coming up empty, answer this question. Under which party ( hint Clinton/Obama ) was the D of D's budget cut 12 of 16 years not only in real numbers but as a % of GDP? Since we know from the table ( the one linked ) that Vets make up 46% of those jobs, exactly who do you guess was hurt most in '93 -'01 and '09 - '17? Maybe Vets?
True statement
Veteran Status
Individuals who have served in the uniformed military service constituted a considerable segment of the federal workforce. At the end of fiscal 2023, 30% of federal employees were veterans compared to 5% of the total employed U.S. civilian labor force. In the same year, 25% of new federal hires were veterans.
![]()
A Profile of the 2023 Federal Workforce
A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization working towards effective government for the American people.ourpublicservice.org
That’s what I have been saying. We had our chance and not enough people listened. Our elections are going to be meaningless. Just like Russia. Hungary. We blew it.You could see this freight train coming a mile away. The oligarchs see rural people as subhuman. Here’s what people don’t realize, there is no voting our way out of this. Just wait and see.