ADVERTISEMENT

Republicans for Kamala Harris launches with Illinois GOPers Edgar, LaHood, Kinzinger, Walsh

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,357
60,386
113

Republicans for Harris endorsers also includes former Trump White House officials Stephanie Grisham and Olivia Troye; former Obama Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel; former Govs. Bill Weld of Massachusetts and Christine Todd Whitman of New Jersey; and the latest supporter, Mesa Arizona Mayor John Giles.​


Aiming to woo GOP voters who reject Donald Trump, the Kamala Harris campaign on Sunday launched “Republicans for Harris,” including from Illinois: former Gov. Jim Edgar, former Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and ex-Reps. Adam Kinzinger and Joe Walsh.


Vice President Harris’ campaign said the “campaign within a campaign” will send GOP endorsers on the road, kick off on-the-ground organizing efforts and use paid ads “to reach, persuade, and mobilize Republican voters.”

The effort to target GOP voters – especially those in battleground states who backed former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley’s Republican primary bid – had already started before President Joe Biden announced July 21 to not seek another term and Harris quickly locked in the support to become the presumptive Democratic nominee.



The Illinois four and the others can appeal to various persuadable elements of the GOP family that is not part of the Trump MAGA movement.

Edgar and LaHood have strong reputations as moderates, with LaHood serving as Transportation Secretary under former President Barack Obama. Conservatives Kinzinger and Walsh are among the nation’s most outspoken Trump critics, warning that democracy is at stake if he returns to the Oval Office.

LaHood is an example of the Republican house divided. His son, Rep. Darin LaHood, R-Ill., is a Trump supporter who attended the GOP convention in Milwaukee last month.

Republicans for Harris start blitzing crucial swing states on Monday. As part of the drive, some will also join Harris with her newly minted vice presidential pick at a rally Tuesday in Philadelphia and stump with the ticket in the battleground state events this week.


Illinois, as a reliable Democratic presidential state since 1992, will not see any of this action.

Kinzinger endorsed the Biden-Harris ticket on June 27, hours before the debate where Biden’s disastrous performance set the stage for him to fold his candidacy.

Kinzinger said in a statement backing Harris, “As a proud conservative, I never thought I’d be endorsing a Democrat for President. But I know Vice President Harris will defend our democracy and ensure Donald Trump never returns to the White House.”

Kinzinger, one of two Republicans on the House Jan. 6 committee investigating the attack on the Capitol intended to prevent Biden from becoming president, said Trump “poses a direct threat to fundamental American values. He only cares about himself, and his pursuit of power. That’s what we saw on January 6 when he sent a mob to overturn our lawful election, who violently attacked law enforcement and ransacked our nation’s Capitol in the process. There’s too much at stake to sit on the sidelines, which is why I wholeheartedly endorse Kamala Harris for President. Now is the time for us all to unite to save our democracy and defeat Donald Trump one last time.”



Walsh who ran against Trump in the 2020 GOP primary, said in a statement, “I am proud to be part of the Republicans for Harris program to ensure those in the party of Lincoln who are disgusted by the extremism, by the hatred, and by the lies put forth by Donald Trump, know that they have a place in this campaign, and can join me in voting for Vice President Harris this November.”

Part of the outreach to disillusioned GOP voters is using high-level veterans of the Trump White House – those who know him best – and their warnings that he should not get another term. Those voices were included in a digital ad released last month titled “Unfit.”

The Harris campaign, mapping out the program for the Democratic convention kicking off Aug. 19 in Chicago, wants to feature Republicans who are making the case to vote for Harris; they’re still determining who those speakers will be.

Harris’ national director of Republican outreach, Austin Weatherford, a former chief of staff to Kinzinger when he was in Congress, said in a statement, “Trump’s MAGA extremism is toxic to the millions of Republicans who no longer believe the party of Donald Trump represents their values and will vote against him again in November.


“Donald Trump said he doesn’t want these voters, but Vice President Harris and our campaign are working overtime to earn the support of my fellow Republicans who care about defending democracy and restoring decency – all of which would be torn away in a second Trump presidency.”

 
Here's their official T shirt.

454225842_1032519414925071_8623336362272978200_n.jpg
 
None of this matters. You have a bunch of prominent Republicans whose party abandoned them for a serial molester of women who is now a convicted felon. If that doesn’t sway voters why would non crazy Republicans matter?
 
This is getting more entertaining by the day!

It's not out of the realm that 2024 could be a landslide loss for the Donald.

Ya just hate to see it.

OK, I'm kidding.

Get back to me when the polls change. Trump is the favorite right now.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kelsers
This is getting more entertaining by the day!

It's not out of the realm that 2024 could be a landslide loss for the Donald.

Ya just hate to see it.

OK, I'm kidding.
Even a landslide won't be what it needs to be. Democrats need to win large enough to actually get new amendments passed. And if that were to happen, Democrats actually need to pass new amendments although I'm sure they'd find a way to not do that.
 
Even a landslide won't be what it needs to be. Democrats need to win large enough to actually get new amendments passed. And if that were to happen, Democrats actually need to pass new amendments although I'm sure they'd find a way to not do that.
Agree.

This is why States like Wyoming, both Dakotas, Montana, and Alaska need to be reduced to only having 1 US Senator.
Their population doesn't justify having the same representation as California, Florida, Texas, Illinois, and New York.
 
Agree.

This is why States like Wyoming, both Dakotas, Montana, and Alaska need to be reduced to only having 1 US Senator.
Their population doesn't justify having the same representation as California, Florida, Texas, Illinois, and New York.
That was kind of the whole point though and I don't disagree with that philosophy inherently, but the filibuster has really broken the Senate. Get rid of that and I think it works far better as it was intended to do.
 
Agree.

This is why States like Wyoming, both Dakotas, Montana, and Alaska need to be reduced to only having 1 US Senator.
Their population doesn't justify having the same representation as California, Florida, Texas, Illinois, and New York.
Of course, you would think it's a great idea, which it isn't.
 
Because his base isn't growing, and probably is losing. Same can't be said for Harris imo.

Harris doesn’t have a base. The Democratic Party has a base. Polls consistently show Trump with nearly 50% support. The only way to beat him soundly is to make that number go down, and his supporters have shown there is nothing that can happen to make that number go down. Look at the math. Trump currently has 270 electoral votes based on current polls. Harris has 247, with 21 up for grabs. Harris has to hold her 247, win the 21 tossups, and steal a state away from Trump. That is a long shot.

I’m hoping Harris squeaks in through the handful of toss-up states. But until polls show a difference there is no rational reason to be overly optimistic.
 
Last edited:
Harris doesn’t have a base. The Democratic Party has a base. Polls consistently show Trump with nearly 50% support. The only way to beat him soundly is to make that number go down, and his supporters have shown there is nothing that can happen to make that number go down. Look at the math. Trump currently has 270 electoral votes based on current polls. Harris has 247, with 21 up for grabs. Harris has to hold her 247, win the 21 tossups, and steal a state away from Trump. That is a long shot.

I’m hoping Harris squeaks in through the handful of toss-up states. But until polls show a difference there is no rational reason to be overly optimistic.
Since Harris is the Democratic nominee, doesn't she have the Democratic party base? You are probably smarter than I am on this topic, but I see Republicans more and more not supporting Trump.
 
Even a landslide won't be what it needs to be. Democrats need to win large enough to actually get new amendments passed. And if that were to happen, Democrats actually need to pass new amendments although I'm sure they'd find a way to not do that.
Popular election of the President.
Money is not speech.
Corporations are not people.
Strengthen separation of church and state.
Eliminate the Senate.
Ditch the 2nd amendment.
Enact the ERA.
Establish a modernized Roe as the law of the land.
Require the budget be balanced at least once every 3 years.
Require environmental stewardship as a constitutional duty of government.

And, of course, the most important one:

Ban public group bathrooms. If only 1 person at a time can use the bathroom, who cares what gender they are or think they are?

What did I forget?
 
Popular election of the President.
Money is not speech.
Corporations are not people.
Strengthen separation of church and state.
Eliminate the Senate.
Ditch the 2nd amendment.
Enact the ERA.
Establish a modernized Roe as the law of the land.
Require the budget be balanced at least once every 3 years.
Require environmental stewardship as a constitutional duty of government.

And, of course, the most important one:

Ban public group bathrooms. If only 1 person at a time can use the bathroom, who cares what gender they are or think they are?

What did I forget?
Well, if you ban gerrymandering and get rid of legalized bribery and fix campaign finance then most of those things can be handled legislatively. Except getting rid of the Senate. That's not happening. Making the Senate focus primarily on foreign affairs and foreign policy makes sense though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT