ADVERTISEMENT

Republicans postpone procedural vote on short-term funding deal

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,937
113
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) postponed a key procedural vote Tuesday on a measure aimed at averting a government shutdown, as Republican leaders continued to try to appease hard-right members of the party. The House GOP will return to negotiations over the continuing resolution, as a Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government and avert a shutdown looms.


Keeping up with politics is easy with The 5-Minute Fix Newsletter, in your inbox weekdays.

The procedural vote, originally scheduled for Tuesday afternoon, would have been a key step toward passing the stopgap funding measure out of the House — even if it was likely to be rejected by the Senate. McCarthy has urged House Republicans to pass something so they can start negotiating with the Senate, but at least a dozen hard-right lawmakers — angry over what they say is a lack of information on top-line budget numbers — have stymied efforts to pass the 30-day funding bill.
In a shift Tuesday, some Republicans who had helped craft the short-term funding deal over the weekend, including Rep. Scott Perry (Pa.), expressed openness to making changes to the package to appease the holdouts in their party. Conversations within the House Republican conference also were far less contentious Tuesday than last week, when tensions came to a boil and McCarthy reportedly dared his detractors to remove him from the speakership.
House GOP’s short-term funding deal already pilloried by hard-right Republicans
In the Republicans’ closed-door conference meeting Tuesday, Rep. Byron Donalds (Fla.), another lawmaker who was involved in negotiations on the continuing resolution, urged his colleagues to simply vote on it, according to a person in attendance who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private meeting.


ADVERTISING


Objectors to the short-term funding deal were instructed Tuesday morning to tell the conference their specific demands, the person said. Only Rep. Bob Good (Va.) stepped up, asking for top-line budget numbers and bemoaning not passing the 12 individual appropriations bills on which the party is united.

Republican leaders then instructed those with objections to meet with the six lawmakers who had negotiated the deal: Reps. Dusty Johnson (S.D.), Stephanie I. Bice (Okla.) and Kelly Armstrong (N.D.) from the pragmatic Main Street Caucus, and Reps. Chip Roy (Tex.), Perry and Donalds from the Freedom Caucus.
Shortly after that, the procedural vote was canceled, prompting confusion and frustration among some Republicans. A large stack of pizzas and a whiteboard were spotted being wheeled into the office of Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), where several GOP lawmakers were gathered.



Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.) lamented the time that he said was being wasted over a proposal that the Senate is almost certain to dramatically change. House Freedom Caucus members and other hard-right holdouts were focusing too much on the initial part of the budget negotiations, he said.
“Another aggravation with me in my own party is that we get caught up in the moment. And we’re not very good at thinking two or three moves from now,” Womack said. “You can’t claim victory on something that has no chance of becoming law. And I have likened it to wetting oneself. … You get a warm feeling that nobody knows.”
The legislation proposed by Republicans over the weekend would keep the government running until Oct. 31 and trigger a 1 percent cut to current fiscal levels, according to the plan released just before lawmakers were briefed Sunday evening. The 1 percent cut is an average for the federal budget. The Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs would not receive any cuts, while other government agencies would see their budgets slashed by 8 percent until the end of October.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: TheCainer
The GOP House are a bunch of lazy pussies. Grow a pair. Do appropriate surgical cuts, including the military. Do what's right and force the Senate to respond.
 
The GOP House are a bunch of lazy pussies. Grow a pair. Do appropriate surgical cuts, including the military. Do what's right and force the Senate to respond.
Joe biden has spent nearly half his presidency on vacation and you're calling the other side lazy. Laughable. Truly.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TC Nole OX
You are talking about people who think Maui was done by space lasers. This is way above them, yet there they are. We are all doomed.
Remember when joe biden showed up to Maui late (bc of vacation obviously) and then went on to joke about the ground being warm and reminiscing on the time his bacon pan caught on fire in his kitchen for 10 minutes? Try again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogBoyRy
America put the Rs back in charge of the House and all we've gotten is one fiscal crisis after another. When will voters wake up and realized the Rs can't govern?
We put biden in the white house and dems in the senate and got supply chain shortages, out of control inflation, military failure, 4 dollar gas (again), etc. Dems do nothing but fail.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
What do you say to this Scrud? This is a republican saying this
I'm fine with shutting down the clown show in general, especially if it means freezing funds for proxy wars with Russia that don't benefit this country in the slightest. I dislike most Republicans in congress just like democrats btw (probably to a slightly lesser degree except in cases like McConnell and graham)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
America put the Rs back in charge of the House and all we've gotten is one fiscal crisis after another. When will voters wake up and realized the Rs can't govern?
And I actually prefer gridlock to liberal spending. That said, the GOP is a disgrace because they aren't doing anything they could be doing to bring back fiscal sanity, or even get the conversation moving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetsGoHawks83
The GOP House are a bunch of lazy pussies. Grow a pair. Do appropriate surgical cuts, including the military. Do what's right and force the Senate to respond.
The House Republicans wouldn’t “do right” if they KNEW what the right thing to do was! The House Republicans are a phuquin’ brown stain on the Constitution of the United States.
Ever since the ascendency of Newt to Speaker, the House Republicans have resembled the Jews and Moses wandering the in desert looking for the “Promised Land”...ironically we are approaching 40 years.....Oh, God! (And His ever-present sense of humor!)
 
And I actually prefer gridlock to liberal spending. That said, the GOP is a disgrace because they aren't doing anything they could be doing to bring back fiscal sanity, or even get the conversation moving.
If the R party was as unified as the D's and politically smart they'd be in a position to win pretty handily next year. But they're neither....

Look for a couple minor concessions and pass a funding deal and send it to the Senate. Seems pretty sensible to non idiots but...Mat Gaetz and co.

Put a possible shut down in the D's court.

I sometimes think the D's have some serious dirt on Matt.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
If the R party was as unified as the D's and politically smart they'd be in a position to win pretty handily next year. But they're neither....

Look for a couple minor concessions and pass a funding deal and send it to the Senate. Seems pretty sensible to non idiots but...Mat Gaetz and co.

Put a possible shut down in the D's court.

I sometimes think the D's have some serious dirt on Matt.
If being unified as a party means falling in lockstep with people like McConnell, Graham, etc then piss on that. As far as Ds having something on gaetz they already lied and overplayed their hand against him. Lefties, of course, lapped it up despite no evidence and it ultimately was a giant nothing burger. Reason number 1748892 that nobody believes the lefts current crusade against Russell brand. Boy who cried wolf and all that.
 
If being unified as a party means falling in lockstep with people like McConnell, Graham, etc then piss on that.
Nobody is suggesting lock stop on anything.

But when the the Democrats control the Executive and Senate the House R's have to be politically smart and realistic about what they can actually achieve. They also have to understand that a government shut down will be hung around their necks if Matt Gaetz and the idiot crew get their way.

That happens and you basically hand the House to the D's and most likely the WH.

That's moronic.

Doesn't matter to Matt Gaetz and his crew because they'll all in safe seats. Then they get to bitch and moan about the Democrats...after basically helping them gain power.
 
And I actually prefer gridlock to liberal spending. That said, the GOP is a disgrace because they aren't doing anything they could be doing to bring back fiscal sanity, or even get the conversation moving.
Finance...we are well into the 21st century today...it isn’t the 1960’s any more....What evidence do you have that would even remotely suggest the Republicans are more financially responsible than Democrats? Other than verbiage and urban legend, there are NO facts to back this idea you hint at!
 
Finance...we are well into the 21st century today...it isn’t the 1960’s any more....What evidence do you have that would even remotely suggest the Republicans are more financially responsible than Democrats? Other than verbiage and urban legend, there are NO facts to back this idea you hint at!
The only time R's are fiscally responsible is when a D is in the White House.
 
All theatrics, bins...
Regardless...the last balanced budget was Clinton with a R House.

If you look at the budget deficits over the last 25 years or so it correlates. Obama's smallest budget deficits were with a R House. Biden is forecasting the same....
 
And I actually prefer gridlock to liberal spending. That said, the GOP is a disgrace because they aren't doing anything they could be doing to bring back fiscal sanity, or even get the conversation moving.
The issue, and it’s not a right or left issue but is a right and left issue is an absolute refusal to compromise. I think the genesis of that thought is that most politicians know they are safe on re-election from anywhere except their left and right flank. If they stay extreme enough they are probably safe. This speaks to the polarization of the electorate.

In the Senate, you see some bipartisanship. In the House not so much. Gerrymandering has led to extremism. If we got rid of gerrymandering I think we would see a return to bipartisanship at least to some extent.
 
Meh. As I’ve said the previous government shutdown threads through the years, nothing will come of this and people will forget about it after the date passes. Political theater at its finest!
 
The issue, and it’s not a right or left issue but is a right and left issue is an absolute refusal to compromise. I think the genesis of that thought is that most politicians know they are safe on re-election from anywhere except their left and right flank. If they stay extreme enough they are probably safe. This speaks to the polarization of the electorate.

In the Senate, you see some bipartisanship. In the House not so much. Gerrymandering has led to extremism. If we got rid of gerrymandering I think we would see a return to bipartisanship at least to some extent.

We need long term fixes for Medicare and SS. We need leadership. Face it; There will be less Medicare and we will have to pay more for it unless we are willing to cut people off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theiacowtipper
Finance...we are well into the 21st century today...it isn’t the 1960’s any more....What evidence do you have that would even remotely suggest the Republicans are more financially responsible than Democrats? Other than verbiage and urban legend, there are NO facts to back this idea you hint at!

I’ve been paying attention to politics since the late 70s. The GQP’s fiscal responsibility rhetoric only applies to “the other.” They are all for socialism and endless spending just so long as they and theirs are the only beneficiaries.
 
We need long term fixes for Medicare and SS. We need leadership. Face it; There will be less Medicare and we will have to pay more for it unless we are willing to cut people off.
Absolutely. But here’s the thing. One side says the only way to fix this is to make cuts. The other side says the only way to fox it is to raise more money. Neither side wants to compromise.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT