But NO ONE KNEW until the tweet on the 28th. NOBODY!!!!!!!!!!
![7c6xg44li9921.jpg](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2F7c6xg44li9921.jpg&hash=443e4f6464a4e519e19bec8079dc187c)
The whole argument started because Fran thought it was a "fair" question for someone to ask if Till's scholarship was pulled. He believes Till would have been on scholarship next year if he didn't leave, so there's no changing his mind. This argument is pointless.
You tell 2 lies in one post, i point it out, and then your response is that I am off the rails?You’re off the rails man
But NO ONE KNEW until the tweet on the 28th. NOBODY!!!!!!!!!!
Are you capable of telling the truth? I did not believe Till would have been on scholarship next year if he didn't leave. I had no idea what the discussions were between Riley and Fran. No one did And that's the point. I did, however, point out that Fran has never put a player on scholarship one year and then have that player walk on the following year.
Please stick with the facts and the truth. Is it that hard for you and Uno?
That is correct.
Whichever way you want to slice it Till wasn’t going to be on scholarship next year
You are good with hindsight. But that is all you are good at.
Again, Cid, get your facts straight. I have never said he would for sure be on scholarship next season. No one did. So I won't come up with 4 of them when there was ZERO of them.I was good enough to find at least 4 posters who stated it before February 28th. Which is 4 more than you have produced saying he would be on scholarship so I have that going for me. Lol. Keep trying, Don Quijote esq of you
I’d ask you to come up with some original insults since the human trash thing has run its course, but I know that original thoughts and content aren’t really your thing and don’t want you to strain yourself trying. I’m done here, but will be patiently waiting for you to get the last word inYou tell 2 lies in one post, i point it out, and then your response is that I am off the rails?
You are human garbage.
They are not insults. When you are caught in lies, no one has use for you and you are disposable, like trash. Get it? You are human trash. And that fact will never run its course on here, don't worry.I’d ask you to come up with some original insults since the human trash thing has run its course, but I know that original thoughts and content aren’t really your thing and don’t want you to strain yourself trying. I’m done here, but will be patiently waiting for you to get the last word in
Again, Cid, get your facts straight. I have never said he would for sure be on scholarship next season. No one did. So I won't come up with 4 of them when there was ZERO of them.
So zero people thought he would be on scholarship next year but nobody KNEW he wouldn’t be on scholarship until the February 28th magic tweet? That magic tweet that you are now telling me confirmed what nobody thought would happen?
Looks like a great concept to go back and forth on. Sorry I helped perpetuate it.
Again, Cid, get your facts straight, and focus on the words "for sure", ok?
Again, I have never said he would for sure be on scholarship next season. No one did. It was PURE SPECULATION PRIOR TO FEB 28.
And there was plenty of speculation and unanswered questions. A few examples:
(1) Was Riley scheduled to graduate this year or was he on a 5 year undergraduate degree plan?
(2) If Riley was back at Iowa next year, would he still be on scholarship or would he be asked to walk on again? But what was interesting in the speculation is that Fran, in 10 years at Iowa, has never put a player on scholarship one year and then asked him to walk on the next year.
(3) If Riley was going to be back next year AND be on scholarship, how would Fran do that? He had 15 on scholarship at that time. Several posters wondered if Fran would have one of his 2 sons walk on in order to keep Riley on scholarship. Fran has plenty of money, some said, so that speculation, TO SOME POSTERS, was plausible..
The Feb 28 tweet from Mark Emmert of the Register basically spelled it all out and made things clear and helped to answer (1), (2) and (3).
And then when Cordell announced he was transferring, that got us from 14 to 13 on scholarship, which is where we needed to be.
So there you go. Do I need to spell anything else out for you or do you have some more dumb comments to make or more dumb questions to ask?
Or is it time to move on?
(2) If Riley was back at Iowa next year, would he still be on scholarship or would he be asked to walk on again? But what was interesting in the speculation is that Fran, in 10 years at Iowa, has never put a player on scholarship one year and then asked him to walk on the next year.
Not in this case, since it has no relevance to my point (which was obvious to everyone but you), which was anyone with at least 1 functioning brain cell knew Riley Till wasn't going to be on scholarship for more than a year.You don't care about the facts?
Wow.
Are you capable of telling the truth? I did not believe Till would have been on scholarship next year if he didn't leave. I had no idea what the discussions were between Riley and Fran. No one did And that's the point. I did, however, point out that Fran has never put a player on scholarship one year and then have that player walk on the following year.
Please stick with the facts and the truth. Is it that hard for you and Uno?
Let it go or are you really that bored to keep arguing something so stupid that doesn’t even matter? Arent there some tweets out there you can start a new thread with?Again, Cid, get your facts straight, and focus on the words "for sure", ok?
Again, I have never said he would for sure be on scholarship next season. No one did. It was PURE SPECULATION PRIOR TO FEB 28.
And there was plenty of speculation and unanswered questions. A few examples:
(1) Was Riley scheduled to graduate this year or was he on a 5 year undergraduate degree plan?
(2) If Riley was back at Iowa next year, would he still be on scholarship or would he be asked to walk on again? But what was interesting in the speculation is that Fran, in 10 years at Iowa, has never put a player on scholarship one year and then asked him to walk on the next year.
(3) If Riley was going to be back next year AND be on scholarship, how would Fran do that? He had 15 on scholarship at that time. Several posters wondered if Fran would have one of his 2 sons walk on in order to keep Riley on scholarship. Fran has plenty of money, some said, so that speculation, TO SOME POSTERS, was plausible..
The Feb 28 tweet from Mark Emmert of the Register basically spelled it all out and made things clear and helped to answer (1), (2) and (3).
And then when Cordell announced he was transferring, that got us from 14 to 13 on scholarship, which is where we needed to be.
So there you go. Do I need to spell anything else out for you or do you have some more dumb comments to make or more dumb questions to ask?
Or is it time to move on?