the whole story couldn't be true. How embarrassing would it be for even a high school player to ask a coach to miss a game to watch a game of a brother in law.Right - a D1 player actually "skipped" a game without permission from the coach and still remained on the team. Not to mention he was fairly non essential as a player and certainly could have been made an example of.
Both Pemsl & Till to UNI?? Ben could use some bigs with experience.
UNI will be good next year, again. They will have a very good backcourt.
Drake could be another option as well. Their center decided to go to Minnesota. Not a bad idea for either or both of them. And DeVries is a darn good coach too.
the whole story couldn't be true. How embarrassing would it be for even a high school player to ask a coach to miss a game to watch a game of a brother in law.
it would be even more that pathetic if a college player did it
If true, that is pretty patheticActually. It is true. Dec. 21st the UofI stated Till was ill would miss the Cincinnati game in Chicago. That same night picture of Riley Till on the sidelines of the 49'ers game.
If true, that is pretty pathetic
I could see either being a good fit for Pemsl. We saw Ellingson flourish and have a good senior year at Drake hopefully same goes for Pemsl where ever he goes. As for Till I don't think he would get many minutes if he went to either school.
Maybe so. I just think as a teammate it would be hard to do. Especially with our depth issues.Theres obviously more to the story. He came back and played the next game. Fran, the coaching staff and the team had no problem with it. Fans shouldnt either
All the conversations were how do we get from 14 to 13. Anyone with a brain knows that walk-ons getting scholarships are one year things.
Ironically, the Legendary Idiot is supporting your comment. And this is the guy who made completely false statements on here about Tyler Cook's ankle injury.As usual, franisdaman has no idea what he is talking about
well, you obviously are too stupid to ask intelligent questions.no one with intelligence was asking this
You use the words "pretty sure."Pretty sure that doesn't apply to guys who were walk ons originally as has been discussed here. When this scholly limit thing came up months ago, I said I'm sure Fran has this worked out or he wouldn't have signed five guys. Pretty sure this worked out exactly that way. CMac who was a walk on first year was Frans ace in the hole if he needed one. Pretty simple really.
Do Tell, don’t leave us hanging. I’m sure there was some kind of conspiracy theory!Ironically, the Legendary Idiot is supporting your comment. And this is the guy who made completely false statements on here about Tyler Cook's ankle injury.
In another thread, as you can see in what follows, there were a lot of questions, guesses and unknowns from several posters when it came to Riley Till and how Iowa got from 15 on scholarship to 13."Riley Till earns scholarship for the 2019-2020 season"
Hawkeye Twitter
"Congrats to
@rtillery20
for earning a scholarship for the 2019-20 season! #Hawkeyes "
"Riley Till Given Scholarship for 2019-20 Season"
"Staff
IOWA CITY, Iowa - University of Iowa head men’s basketball coach Fran McCaffery announced Wednesday that redshirt junior Riley Till will be put on scholarship for the 2019-20 season."
"Three-year walk-on Riley Till has worked his way into a scholarship for the 2019-20 Iowa basketball season.
Coach Fran McCaffery announced today that the redshirt junior will be placed on scholarship for the upcoming season "
"Dubuque native Riley Till has been placed on scholarship for the 2019-20 season by University of Iowa head men's basketball coach Fran McCaffery."
There seems to be a great deal of people who posted very specifically that he was placed on scholarship for the 19-20 season. They didn't use a generic 'awarded a scholarship' they specified the season it was for. Odd that you are missing that part.
Is Till’s scholarship for one year or for his redshirt senior year, too?
I'm guessing here, but I doubt that Till will be on scholarship next year if he doesn't opt to leave after he graduates in May and I would put Pemsl in that same boat. Could they stay, probably but with so many players we have a Fran's disposal, I hardly think they will see much playing time.
Fran, your count is right. As for who might transfer out it.s anybody's guess. I think Till graduates and if he stays, he can go back to walk-on status, and with Cordells injury history he may be ready to transfer or hang up his sneakers. It's possible that Conner may be able to go back to walk on status since that's where he started but I really don't know. Also guessing that Patrick will apply and get a medical redshirt year.
Patrick and/or Connor will go the walkon route if needed. Not to worry.
The NCAA has changed the rules since Doug was in college. If you start on scholarship, the school has to honor it for 4 years. So players cannot be Creaned... That's a good thing.
That noted, it does not mention players voluntarily giving up their scholarship. So PMac may be able to drop his scholarship. Prossibly.
The four year-scholarship requirement is a Big 10 rule, not an NCAA one.
https://www.espn.com/college-sports...ntees-four-year-scholarships-student-athletes
In another thread, as you can see in what follows, there were a lot of questions, guesses and unknowns from several posters when it came to Riley Till and how Iowa got from 15 on scholarship to 13.
And these are some good posters, too.
LINK to this Thread: https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/threads/how-many-scholarships-available-for-2020-2021.299905/page-2
LOL"the discussion on here was that Riley could remain on scholarship and Connor or PMac could walk on."
I saw several questions about whether Connor or PMac could change status. Very few if any thinking that Riley would stay on scholarship. The people who write about these things were pretty clear. That Iowa basketball program tweet was fairly specific as well. They may have had insight on how it was awarded and the expectation. But continue on, that horse can take a couple of more beatings after it died.
"the discussion on here was that Riley could remain on scholarship and Connor or PMac could walk on."
I saw several questions about whether Connor or PMac could change status. Very few if any thinking that Riley would stay on scholarship. The people who write about these things were pretty clear. That Iowa basketball program tweet was fairly specific as well. They may have had insight on how it was awarded and the expectation. But continue on, that horse can take a couple of more beatings after it died.
Anybody with a brain and a little bit of memory knows you are COMPLETELY WRONG.
The conversations were how do we get from 15 on scholarship to 13, and you know it. But apparently your memory is extremely poor.
But let me refresh you.
It was not until Mark Emmert reported that Till would be part of Senior Day, was graduating and moving on that we got from 15 to 14 on scholarship.
And then when Pemsl announced he was transferring we got from 14 to 13 on scholarship.
Anybody with a brain and a little bit of memory knows you are COMPLETELY WRONG.
The conversations were how do we get from 15 on scholarship to 13, and you know it. But apparently your memory is extremely poor.
But let me refresh you.
It was not until Mark Emmert reported that Till would be part of Senior Day, was graduating and moving on that we got from 15 to 14 on scholarship.
And then when Pemsl announced he was transferring we got from 14 to 13 on scholarship.
Pic of sis...I thought he said closer to his sister's home in the Nashville area.
the facts are the facts and you are wrong.wrong. Luckily everyone knows that on here.
the facts are the facts and you are wrong.
And one of those facts is that it was not until Mark Emmert reported the following that we knew FOR SURE what was happening to Riley Till's scholarship. You can deny the facts all you want and say that you knew all the time what was happening for sure but you know you are wrong by doing so. You just won't ever admit it. You are behaving just like Legend12, and that's not good company to be in.
:
the facts are the facts and you are wrong.
And one of those facts is that it was not until Mark Emmert reported the following that we knew FOR SURE what was happening to Riley Till's scholarship. You can deny the facts all you want and say that you knew all the time what was happening for sure but you know you are wrong by doing so. You just won't ever admit it. You are behaving just like Legend12, and that's not good company to be in.
:
Yep. The only possible way he was going to get another year is if he came off the bench and miraculously provided 10 points and 8 rebounds every night, which was and is highly unlikely for a walk-on. The way it played out there was no way he was getting another and that was evident early on. He got a free year, great for him.So I'm in that camp that assumed Tills scholarship was only for one year. I thought that all along. I thought that was made clear last year.
Did you mean people other than the people who posted headlines and articles stating that it was for the 2019-2020 season? If that is the case then “people” needs to be changed to “person” or depending on how it was used it you be “I” or “me”. People would imply that there was more than one.
Did you mean people other than the people who posted headlines and articles stating that it was for the 2019-2020 season? If that is the case then “people” needs to be changed to “person” or depending on how it was used it you be “I” or “me”. People would imply that there was more than one.
He's arguing semantics. Other than Fran, the staff, and Till no one absolutely knew that the scholarship was only for one year. The vast majority of us were fairly certain it was only one year with a very small chance it could be awarded for a second year.
He's arguing semantics. Other than Fran, the staff, and Till no one absolutely knew that the scholarship was only for one year. The vast majority of us were fairly certain it was only one year with a very small chance it could be awarded for a second year.
Did you mean people other than the people who posted headlines and articles stating that it was for the 2019-2020 season? If that is the case then “people” needs to be changed to “person” or depending on how it was used it you be “I” or “me”. People would imply that there was more than one.
He's arguing semantics. Other than Fran, the staff, and Till no one absolutely knew that the scholarship was only for one year. The vast majority of us were fairly certain it was only one year with a very small chance it could be awarded for a second year.
Yep. The only possible way he was going to get another year is if he came off the bench and miraculously provided 10 points and 8 rebounds every night, which was and is highly unlikely for a walk-on. The way it played out there was no way he was getting another and that was evident early on. He got a free year, great for him.
One scholly was available, he was rewarded with it for his contributions, same as other walk-ons before him, and into the future. They don't have to do it, but I'm glad they do.