ADVERTISEMENT

Saudi Arabia: 'We've seen the pain' and we don't care

He brought up refineries, I posted a link about refineries. This thread might be better if people started posting links that support their arguments instead of just spouting crap out their asses.
We have been asking you to post something real the whole time. Please link to the US energy plan you support. And if that plan involves the US government you're a collectivist too.
 
We have been asking you to post something real the whole time. Please link to the US energy plan you support. And if that plan involves the US government you're a collectivist too.

It's not "collectivist" to suggest that the U.S. and other non-OPEC nations relax regulation on private industry so they can better compete against the OPEC cartel. That's the opposite of collectivism.
 
It's not "collectivist" to suggest that the U.S. and other non-OPEC nations relax regulation on private industry so they can better compete against the OPEC cartel. That's the opposite of collectivism.
Nope, when you allow the oil company to pollute, we all collectively now have to deal with the problem. Removing regulations is the worst sort of collectivism. The people get all the risk and none of the reward. It's the sort of collectivism cons always love.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
They cut production, we increase. They increase, we decrease. Rinse and repeat until they're reacting to the market instead of dictating it.

They increase....we decrease. Ok...good. So that's what we're doing now. Ummm...it isn't supporting the price of oil, ya know.
 

Screen-shot-2014-04-24-at-2.31.28-PM.png

PADD 2 is handling tar sands oil NOW. I suppose they must have the capability, no?
 
I'm still trying to figure out what "victory" means...

I posted a story in which the Saudis said, "we're keeping oil prices low to drive competitors out of business" and somehow I'm wrong about that?
 
Last edited:
Are you even paying attention? It doesn't prevent them from flooding the market. Never said that.

For about the tenth time: The Saudis/OPEC are flooding the market now. When they pull back, prices will go up. If non-OPEC nations don't want the price to go up, then the non-OPEC nations will need the capacity to increase their own production, blunting OPEC's attempt to force an increase in price.

That is how an increase in capacity gives us the ability to counter OPECs actions.

That is how capitalism works. America's response has always been to allow the oil folks leeway and cushion the down-side via the tax code. You should have been an independent pharmacist back in the late 60's and early 70's when Nixon "froze" the retail prices on RX drugs...My dad damn near went out of business as he was selling RX for less than he could buy them. Nixon is the reason the the small independent Drug Store went out of business and gave rise to the corporate drug stores like Walgreens, Osco, CVS and the like.
 
That is how capitalism works. America's response has always been to allow the oil folks leeway and cushion the down-side via the tax code. You should have been an independent pharmacist back in the late 60's and early 70's when Nixon "froze" the retail prices on RX drugs...My dad damn near went out of business as he was selling RX for less than he could buy them. Nixon is the reason the the small independent Drug Store went out of business and gave rise to the corporate drug stores like Walgreens, Osco, CVS and the like.

That really sucks. Sorry about your dad.

I'm being sincere. Not snarky.

Price controls are a bad thing.
 
I'm still trying to figure out what "victory" means...

I posted a story in which the Saudis said, "we're keeping oil prices low to drive competitors out of business" and somehow I'm wrong about that?

Nobody disputes that. It's all the fantasy post-op that's the problem.
 
As he told m,e often..."Life doesn't have to be fair." The Saudi's a practicing business. Again....Life is not fair.

I edited some extra content that you might have missed.

There should not be price controls, which is why I hate OPEC.
 
Nobody disputes that. It's all the fantasy post-op that's the problem.

*groan*

I really don't understand what the hell your problem is. It's like you've made it your mission today to argue about whatever I have to say in this thread. Most of what I've said is basic "supply and demand" stuff and yet you somehow figure out a way to challenge that.

The conversation I would like to have is how do non-OPEC countries challenge the market manipulation of the cartel? I don't understand why this is such a divisive topic.
 
*groan*

I really don't understand what the hell your problem is. It's like you've made it your mission today to argue about whatever I have to say in this thread. Most of what I've said is basic "supply and demand" stuff and yet you somehow figure out a way to challenge that.

The conversation I would like to have is how do non-OPEC countries challenge the market manipulation of the cartel? I don't understand why this is such a divisive topic.


You dont....not without government intervention. You cannot have it both ways. It just isn't possible.
 
And he laid the framework for the modern day GOP.

No, that was Goldwater, whose principles Reagan resurrected after the Nixon meltdown.

Nixon did NOT represent GOP principles of small government and regulatory restraint. He created the EPA, he took us off the gold standard, he started the war on drugs, he had enemies lists, he ordered burglary... Nixon is a stain on the GOP.
 
You dont....not without government intervention. You cannot have it both ways. It just isn't possible.

Private western companies could absolutely collude against OPEC except for ****OOOPS****.... that's illegal in western countries.

So, I guess we're all just Saudi Arabia's bitches.
 
No, that was Goldwater, whose principles Reagan resurrected after the Nixon meltdown.

Nixon did NOT represent GOP principles of small government and regulatory restraint. He created the EPA, he took us off the gold standard, he started the war on drugs, he had enemies lists, he ordered burglary... Nixon is a stain on the GOP.
No...NO...No......Goldwater lost in a landslide...Nixon won a close one....The "conservative" ideals you speak of are rooted in racism.
 
Private western companies could absolutely collude against OPEC except for ****OOOPS***.... that's illegal in western countries.

So, I guess we're all just Saudi Arabia's bitches.
You should read what you just wrote, let this sink in for a little bit, then you should feel bad.
 
No...NO...No......Goldwater lost in a landslide...Nixon won a close one....The "conservative" ideals you speak of are rooted in racism.

Good grief. The candidate of racism was George Wallace, a democrat, gunned down during the 1972 election primaries. That was the year Nixon was elected in case you're too young to remember that.
 
Good grief. The candidate of racism was George Wallace, a democrat, gunned down during the 1972 election primaries. That was the year Nixon was elected in case you're too young to remember that.
THe candidate of OBVIOUS racism might have been George Wallace...The candidate of racism as a strategy was Richard M. Nixon. His model ,of election has stood the test of time for the GOP. Reagan added evangelicals to the mix.
 
THe candidate of OBVIOUS racism might have been George Wallace...The candidate of racism as a strategy was Richard M. Nixon. His model ,of election has stood the test of time for the GOP. Reagan added evangelicals to the mix.

Then I guess the entire country was "racist" in 1984 except for Minnesota and D.C....

reagan-mondale-1984-electoral-college-map.jpg
 
*groan*

I really don't understand what the hell your problem is. It's like you've made it your mission today to argue about whatever I have to say in this thread. Most of what I've said is basic "supply and demand" stuff and yet you somehow figure out a way to challenge that.

The conversation I would like to have is how do non-OPEC countries challenge the market manipulation of the cartel? I don't understand why this is such a divisive topic.

We've already told you how to challenge the manipulation of the market. Drill, baby, drill isn't it. The House of Saud and its minions control the oil market. We can't possibly change that any time soon. What we can change is our NEED for their product. Why do you not understand that our power lies in the demand?
 
We've already told you how to challenge the manipulation of the market. Drill, baby, drill isn't it. The House of Saud and its minions control the oil market. We can't possibly change that any time soon. What we can change is our NEED for their product. Why do you not understand that our power lies in the demand?

THAT is obviously a long-term solution. I am all for the development of "clean energy" if it makes economic sense.

Nobody disputes that. It's all the fantasy post-op that's the problem.

Your idea that we can reduce demand enough and quickly enough to deflect OPEC price manipulation in the short term is a total fantasy.
 
THAT is obviously a long-term solution. I am all for the development of "clean energy" if it makes economic sense.
It'll never make "economic sense" to you because that requires govt support. Just like coal and oil required govt support.
Your idea that we can reduce demand enough and quickly enough to deflect OPEC price manipulation in the short term is a total fantasy.

You might be surprised at what America can accomplish when there's a unified vision. You should have more faith.
 
As was reported last July, nearly 50,000 U.S. energy jobs have been lost in the past three months on top of 100,000 employees laid off since oil prices started to fall. Initial rounds of layoffs were blue-collar jobs such as roughnecks, fracking crews. More recently, engineers and scientists are being let go, which is an indication the oil patch doesn’t think there will be a recovery in petroleum prices for at least two years.

I live in Alberta, Canada, where 35,000 industry jobs have disappeared provincewide.

The oil business cannot turn on a dime. And Saudi Arabia is sitting on more than $1 trillion tucked in its war chest. Once it decides to shut down some of its spigots, thereby sending crude prices back to the $100 barrel range, its high-cost competitors will take years to ramp up old and abandoned projects.

This is exactly what happened in 1985. I know because I was at an emergency OPEC meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, when Saudi Arabia executed this same policy to shut down high-cost oil producers by flooding world markets with oil. The benchmark price of crude fell to $10 per barrel. The North American oil industry didn’t recover for than more a decade.

And so it goes again, but this time Saudi has an important ally: the president of the United States.

http://personalliberty.com/the-real-reason-obama-nixed-the-keystone-pipeline/
 
As was reported last July, nearly 50,000 U.S. energy jobs have been lost in the past three months on top of 100,000 employees laid off since oil prices started to fall. Initial rounds of layoffs were blue-collar jobs such as roughnecks, fracking crews. More recently, engineers and scientists are being let go, which is an indication the oil patch doesn’t think there will be a recovery in petroleum prices for at least two years.

I live in Alberta, Canada, where 35,000 industry jobs have disappeared provincewide.

The oil business cannot turn on a dime. And Saudi Arabia is sitting on more than $1 trillion tucked in its war chest. Once it decides to shut down some of its spigots, thereby sending crude prices back to the $100 barrel range, its high-cost competitors will take years to ramp up old and abandoned projects.

This is exactly what happened in 1985. I know because I was at an emergency OPEC meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, when Saudi Arabia executed this same policy to shut down high-cost oil producers by flooding world markets with oil. The benchmark price of crude fell to $10 per barrel. The North American oil industry didn’t recover for than more a decade.

And so it goes again, but this time Saudi has an important ally: the president of the United States.

http://personalliberty.com/the-real-reason-obama-nixed-the-keystone-pipeline/

That might very possibly be the dumbest thing you've posted yet. That article was mind-bendingly stupid. Again...you should stop.
 
The oil business, as previously mentioned is a "boom-bust" business. Always has been and that is never going to change.
I remember reading about the "good times" of oil in west Texas back in the 70's. The writer was talking about how the Highway Patrol told him how common it was to find some "wildcatter" passed out drunk along the side of a west Texas highway, in his Mercedes and having THOUSANDS of dollars cash in his blue jeans.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT