- Sep 13, 2002
- 97,906
- 204,182
- 113
But they aren't ducking them. In fact, they are being even more accommodating to UNI and Drake than other mid-majors - who ONLY get to play AT Iowa or AT Iowa State.Originally posted by Lone Clone:
In football I would agree. But again, hoops is another breed of cat.Originally posted by torbee:
The Big 4 is a perfect compromise.
I'm sorry, but there is no reason at all that Iowa and Iowa State need to be giving charity to their non Power 5 brethren in the state. If they want the bonuses that come from playing the big boys, they need to do it on their terms.
In basketball, I could see UI and ISU demanding that either they play a 2-for-1 or when the game is at Drake or UNI, the venue be the Wells Fargo or UNIdome, just purely from a financial standpoint.
But in terms of not playing them, as long as the big guys are schedule Maryland Dinah Shore and all those double-directional schools, there is no legitimate argument for ducking UNI and Drake.
As I said, setting up a neutral court situation on an annual basis is throwing them a bone.
Now, I also wouldn't mind seeing it being an ACTUAL tournament. But most years, it would probably end up being an Iowa-Iowa State final, which would be weird, considering that home-away series will never (nor should it) go away.
I guess you could just set it up as four separate games - Iowa-UNI and ISU-Drake Friday, Iowa-Drake, ISU-UNI Saturday. That would work for me as well.
But neither Iowa nor Iowa State should feel compelled to give every-other-year home games (or any, really) to mid-majors, even if they happen to reside within state borders.