ISU to UW is not a lateral move. It is a couple steps up.UW is a harder turn around than ISU in a tougher conference. They are lucky to get a good coach from a G5. DeBoer could have stayed a few more years in Fresno and likely found much greener pastures. It's a very tough place to win. I think Campbell will stay at ISU as I don't think he is a serious candidate for any major jobs just rebuilds. UW is a rebuilding job and it's a lateral move in terms of program prestige but in a tougher conference. I think ND will look to land an NFL guy if they can't get Fickell.
Washington had success with Peterson and was ok with Starkasian. Before and after UW has been a dumpster fire. In a much better conference but other than the Peterson years, pretty mediocre to abysmal. I would liken them to a better Vanderbilt in terms of program overall. Now it's true that UWs best years are better, but ISU has been more consistent as a winning program though lots of 7-8 win seasons. Steve S brought 7-8 win seasons to UW and Peterson had a strong run with three 10 win seasons . But before Steve S and the last two years UW had a lot of 3-4 win seasons. I just don't see it as a step up given how bad they were before the 2010 season.ISU to UW is not a lateral move. It is a couple steps up.
But yes Big !@ will be easier going forward. Even the next couple of years with Lincoln Riley gone.
Admirable. I’ll give him that. It makes utterly no sense from a career standpoint, but he sticks to his principles.
UW is LOADED. They were trying to get him on the cheap.
Have you seen the contracts that have been flying around out there?$7M/year is getting him on the cheap?
Have you seen the contracts that have been flying around out there?
Have you seen the contracts that have been flying around out there?
How do you measure quality of life though. Seattle > Ames, by a million times.The amount he gets paid in Iowa is roughly equivalent to 6.7 million in Seattle. When you also account for the unprecedented control and job security he enjoys at Ames ... the UW offer is low.
There WILL be the issue that Big 12 likely quickly becomes a second tier conference ... and that will dilute his current marketability. However, until then ... it's obvious that he has a sweet deal at Iowa State.
It will be interesting to see how the Iowa State budget contracts as they only obtain 2nd tier TV rights.
You couldn't pay me to live in Ames. On the other hand I would pay to live in Seattle. In fact I just might. 😉How do you measure quality of life though. Seattle > Ames, by a million times.
are you saying that it costs 2.7 million more per year to live in seattle than it does in Ames?" hard to beleiveThe amount he gets paid in Iowa is roughly equivalent to 6.7 million in Seattle. When you also account for the unprecedented control and job security he enjoys at Ames ... the UW offer is low.
There WILL be the issue that Big 12 likely quickly becomes a second tier conference ... and that will dilute his current marketability. However, until then ... it's obvious that he has a sweet deal at Iowa State.
It will be interesting to see how the Iowa State budget contracts as they only obtain 2nd tier TV rights.
Washington?Admirable. I’ll give him that. It makes utterly no sense from a career standpoint, but he sticks to his principles.
Yeah, lol at “lateral move.”ISU to UW is not a lateral move. It is a couple steps up.
But yes Big !@ will be easier going forward. Even the next couple of years with Lincoln Riley gone.
You are so full of it. UW is far above ISU in the pecking order of CFB.Washington had success with Peterson and was ok with Starkasian. Before and after UW has been a dumpster fire. In a much better conference but other than the Peterson years, pretty mediocre to abysmal. I would liken them to a better Vanderbilt in terms of program overall. Now it's true that UWs best years are better, but ISU has been more consistent as a winning program though lots of 7-8 win seasons. Steve S brought 7-8 win seasons to UW and Peterson had a strong run with three 10 win seasons . But before Steve S and the last two years UW had a lot of 3-4 win seasons. I just don't see it as a step up given how bad they were before the 2010 season.
One could ask that question of just about any college coach who jumps to another school really.Maybe he sees what is possible in iowa— a steady job in one location for his kids like Kirk and his staff has had. If you make 4 million a year does more mean that much?
I was OK until you mentioned the TV rights. You lost me there. Tier 1 and 2 rights belong to the conference. Individual schools keep the Tier 3 rights. I think the Big XII may be the only major conference where this is the case, but I wouldn't bet on it. I think the provision was to let UT keep the LHN.The amount he gets paid in Iowa is roughly equivalent to 6.7 million in Seattle. When you also account for the unprecedented control and job security he enjoys at Ames ... the UW offer is low.
There WILL be the issue that Big 12 likely quickly becomes a second tier conference ... and that will dilute his current marketability. However, until then ... it's obvious that he has a sweet deal at Iowa State.
It will be interesting to see how the Iowa State budget contracts as they only obtain 2nd tier TV rights.
You beat me to it. I was going to reply to a post that said two ridiculous things, one of which was that UW is a tougher rebuilding job than ISU. In fact, UW has a history of major successes, A lot of us remember the Don James era.You are so full of it. UW is far above ISU in the pecking order of CFB.
2 National Championships
17 Conference titles
4 Division titles
7 Rose Bowl wins
ISU hasn't won a conference title in over 100 years. Not even a close comparison.
My reference to 2nd tier was simply intended to match up more with being a synonym of lower-level. My intention was different than the distinction that you are trying to draw.I was OK until you mentioned the TV rights. You lost me there. Tier 1 and 2 rights belong to the conference. Individual schools keep the Tier 3 rights. I think the Big XII may be the only major conference where this is the case, but I wouldn't bet on it. I think the provision was to let UT keep the LHN.
Up until three or four years ago, I would have agreed with you. Not now. I was in Seattle two years ago and based on the news stories, it's gotten worse since then.How do you measure quality of life though. Seattle > Ames, by a million times.
You were referring to the likelihood that TV money in the new conference will be less? Makes sense. I misunderstood because "Tier Two" has a specific meaning when discussing the subject. No big deal.My reference to 2nd tier was simply intended to match up more with being a synonym of lower-level. My intention was different than the distinction that you are trying to draw.
How do you measure quality of life though. Seattle > Ames, by a million times.
Quality of life??? Much of that can be rather subjective, no?are you saying that it costs 2.7 million more per year to live in seattle than it does in Ames?" hard to beleive
WU is a top 20 program all-time. Huge metro area. Fairly easy conference. Huge corporate sponsors to tap into, and West Coast talent to recruit from. It's a job on par with Michigan or LSU - 2nd best historic team in their respective conferences. Yeah, Oregon has Nike... but I see that and raise you Amazon, Microsoft, T-Mobile and Starbucks. USC has more wins, but they aren't even the only P5 in their municipality. With the right coach, they will be right back in the thick of things.Washington had success with Peterson and was ok with Starkasian. Before and after UW has been a dumpster fire. In a much better conference but other than the Peterson years, pretty mediocre to abysmal. I would liken them to a better Vanderbilt in terms of program overall. Now it's true that UWs best years are better, but ISU has been more consistent as a winning program though lots of 7-8 win seasons. Steve S brought 7-8 win seasons to UW and Peterson had a strong run with three 10 win seasons . But before Steve S and the last two years UW had a lot of 3-4 win seasons. I just don't see it as a step up given how bad they were before the 2010 season.
I’d seriously rather live in Ames. Seattle is not desirable for everyone.How do you measure quality of life though. Seattle > Ames, by a million times.
If Saban wants $20 million, Alabama will give it to him.if the reported $15M/ year is true for some of these coaches, what the hell is Saban worth? $20M?
its getting out of control
Dude, come on. He’s saying the cost of living is higher in Seattle which it obviously would be. 4 dollars in Ames is equivalent to 6.7 dollars in Seattle. Does the lower numbers help?are you saying that it costs 2.7 million more per year to live in seattle than it does in Ames?" hard to beleive
Also depends if he is vaccinated. Wash St. Fired their coach because Of the States Vaccination laws. If Campbell is against it that could be the reason.
Not getting vaccinated is stupid in the first place but throwing away 3 million and a chance to live in the Northwest over Ames rather than get vaccinated? Holy fck that would be the mother of all stupidity.Admirable. I’ll give him that. It makes utterly no sense from a career standpoint, but he sticks to his principles.
Ya but it's Pullman.Not getting vaccinated is stupid in the first place but throwing away 3 million and a chance to live in the Northwest over Ames rather than get vaccinated? Holy fck that would be the mother of all stupidity.
*If* he really was offered the job.UW is LOADED. They were trying to get him on the cheap.