Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He’s searching for tweets to form a response.
(There you go again Devil...reading, comprehending, questioning...you PRICK!)the terrorism bill was brought up in the article you posted.
Lol @Moral turned me on to the idea awhile ago. Today it was confirmed by one of your threads. Take a guess which one.You are wrong nearly all the time I've noticed. SAD
Lol @Moral turned me on to the idea awhile ago. Today it was confirmed by one of your threads. Take a guess which one.
You and fbnbb share an iq score as well as affection for a certain sport. Too big of a coincidence.
I’m already tracking new Brian. He’s got a bullpen.I still like the theory. I had Brian sniffed out on his last handle way before he made it clear.
Now this is a comrade that belongs on Gitmo in solitary for the rest of its life!Why don’t democrats care about the kids?
Schumer pledges votes on gun control if GOP advances domestic terrorism bill
Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) is telling colleagues that they will have the opportunity to vote on amendments to curb gun-related violence if Republicans agree to a debate on a do…thehill.com
Drunk again, huh?That is who they are.
Sooooo, Republicans are evil for not voting for the democrats bill, but the democrats are NOT evil for not voting for the republican bill. Makes complete sense.the terrorism bill was brought up in the article you posted.
Nope. Did not say or imply in that post.Sooooo, Republicans are evil for not voting for the democrats bill, but the democrats are NOT evil for not voting for the republican bill. Makes complete sense.
They should debate it, no argument from meOk, how's this?
Schumer is an idiot.
Now, why won't Republicans even discuss any gun control laws? Licensing? Registration? Universal background checks? Required training?
None of those would impact 2A, none of them would ban a single type of gun or accessory, all have been included in discussions regarding gun control (and with the training it wasn't even universal requirement) yet none of them get off the cutting room floor with the GOP.
Yes. You did. You picked what you wanted out of the op without addressing the overall point.Nope. Did not say or imply in that post.
To be fair, our side has less experience defending the undefendable. You guys are pros at it.No this is standard playbook for HROT liberals. When your side looks bad all you do is deflect, blame others, or resort to personal attacks. That’s your MO. Only one person so far has addressed the subject at hand
When is the last time anything was debated?They should debate it, no argument from me
Yes. You did. You picked what you wanted out of the op without addressing the overall point.
This is the GOP summed up perfectly. Useless with blood on their hands. NRA domestic terrorists
Chis this thread is about Schumer try to pay attention
the terrorism bill was brought up in the article you posted.
then you are doing it wrongTo be fair, our side has less experience defending the undefendable. You guys are pros at it.
You've literally never put anyone in their place, fatass.Don’t even get me started. You’ll bait me, I’ll respond. Put you in your place. Then you cry and call mods or one of your dads in to save you.
Certainly have little guy. You don’t remember? It was only a month ago. Clearly still have a nice condo up there.You've literally never put anyone in their place, fatass.
So, Dems should follow the lead of the GOP and defend the indefensible? Got it.then you are doing it wrong
Can we say that this bill popped up 23 years after the Columbine tragedy? How about 10 years after Sandy Hook? Is that enough time?I will have to look into it more, but I do not trust bills that pop up this quickly after a tragedy. I also don't trust bills with shiny names.
So faux outrage by RN. Never big picture with these people.“If Republicans can vote with us to get on that bill, we can have a debate on considering common-sense, strong gun safety amendments, hopefully with bipartisan support,” he said. “Let me be clear: we are going to vote on gun legislation, and the Republicans could let us start doing that as soon as tomorrow, if they simply voted yes on the motion to proceed.”
Senate Republicans have already said they will block the bill, which they characterize as an overreach of federal authority.
Yet he’s far smarter than you are.Chis is the cheap dime store hood of the internet. The epitome of "loser".
What a take.Sooooo, Republicans are evil for not voting for the democrats bill, but the democrats are NOT evil for not voting for the republican bill. Makes complete sense.
so this stand alone bill introduced by Republicans won't do anything to help with school safety? The past few days all I have heard is that the Republicans don't do anything, but when they do it is the democrats who block it. Oh the irony. Why is Schumer putting politics above the safety of school children?So faux outrage by RN. Never big picture with these people.
I thought you were still in time out?Yet he’s far smarter than you are.
Smart enough to not drink and drive multiple times and put countless innocent lives in danger.Yet he’s far smarter than you are.
What a dumbass.Have one door… and have that one door, armed police officers at that door. If that had happened..
To be fair to Ron Johnson, there is a lot of money to be made by contractors in hardening schools from potential attack, and many of them do or would give him a slice of that money.The bill is not dead-
Schumer pledged to allow gun violence-related amendments on the domestic terrorism bill after he objected to a request by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) for unanimous consent to advance a proposal to “harden” schools from potential attack.
Repubs ARE evil for a variety of reasons, but I did not claim that in the post he cited.What a take.
Gun violence is just one problem, among several, that is far worse in the US than in other developed nations. We're not feeling around in the dark here; there are many other countries that have successfully prevented and/or solved problems like this, and we could model our solutions after theirs. But in each case, it's the Republicans who are convinced either that nothing can be done, or that failing to bow to the wishes of our corporate overlords will destroy our freedoms. There are also enough Democrats in bed with corporate interests that real solutions are unlikely, and the Citizens United decision (brought to you by...) makes it increasingly so.No this is standard playbook for HROT liberals. When your side looks bad all you do is deflect, blame others, or resort to personal attacks. That’s your MO. Only one person so far has addressed the subject at hand
This hits the nail on the head. This here is why both sides will get nothing done. Now, I put more blame on Rs because most will say there's nothing you can do... it's just crazy people or let's pour gas on the fire by adding more guns. That said, Ds have enough who are in bed with the special interests or want to protect their position/power so won't take action for fear of losing an election in a conservative area.Gun violence is just one problem, among several, that is far worse in the US than in other developed nations. We're not feeling around in the dark here; there are many other countries that have successfully prevented and/or solved problems like this, and we could model our solutions after theirs. But in each case, it's the Republicans who are convinced either that nothing can be done, or that failing to bow to the wishes of our corporate overlords will destroy our freedoms. There are also enough Democrats in bed with corporate interests that real solutions are unlikely, and the Citizens United decision (brought to you by...) makes it increasingly so.