ADVERTISEMENT

Secret Scrimmage

And Tyler Cook? And Woodbury? Fran has recruited well and developed tons of talent at the five. Just seems to have struck out lately at that position.
The 1 is very hard to get a Top 100 player at as I think there are only like 3 white guys in the Top 100 under 6’5” - meaning almost every PG is out of state and many are heavy urban areas hard to get to Iowa.

Fran is left with some local underdogs like Bohannon or reaching for Top 200 athletic guards like Ulis, Joe T and Bowen and hoping they play higher than their rank.

Bowen is the best of that group imo but remains to be seen.
 
I may be wrong but I believe Josh has/had Graves Disease which is an autoimmune issue that impacts the thyroid. Difficult to deal with especially an athlete due to the physical demands of playing a sport.
This is why I cringe when I hear people calling him lazy or having bad eating habits when they don't really know what he's dealing with.
 
Wow. I have heard everything now. This obviously is just a troll job. Even the most avid Fran hater doesn’t believe this.
Wow is right. I don't know how you came up with that at all. I certainly am NOT a Fran hater. Please tell me how Cook or Woodbury got significantly better after their freshman years? Cook never developed any kind of consistent shot outside 6-8 ft. He shot a decent % because of all the rim wreckers, but he was hardly skilled offensively. Any other improvement would have been fairly normal for a good college player after 3 years. Woodbury was a solid defensive center when he got to Iowa. Average rebounder which he got marginally better at. Not skilled offensively and only got marginally better over four years in that end. Small hands with little touch really held him back. I just din't see where either of them developed a great deal beyond what should be expected from freshman to junior year. Remember Woody was a top 50-70 player coming out of high school with a KU and UNC offer, and Cook was a four star with plenty of offers. Both were very good players in high school at what they were good at. Just don't see where they really improved drastically at those weak area's.
 
I think you'll see Ulis and Perkins starting together. They've always played well together, and Frans teams are always low turnover teams. With Ahron handling the ball, and good free throw shooting I think he and Tony will be a really good back court. Love the other guys coming off the bench.
 
Wow is right. I don't know how you came up with that at all. I certainly am NOT a Fran hater. Please tell me how Cook or Woodbury got significantly better after their freshman years? Cook never developed any kind of consistent shot outside 6-8 ft. He shot a decent % because of all the rim wreckers, but he was hardly skilled offensively. Any other improvement would have been fairly normal for a good college player after 3 years. Woodbury was a solid defensive center when he got to Iowa. Average rebounder which he got marginally better at. Not skilled offensively and only got marginally better over four years in that end. Small hands with little touch really held him back. I just don't see where either of them developed a great deal beyond what should be expected from freshman to junior year. Remember Woody was a top 50-70 player coming out of high school with a KU and UNC offer, and Cook was a four star with plenty of offers. Both were very good players in high school at what they were good at. Just don't see where they really improved drastically at those weak area's.
I would say Woodbury maxed out his ability by the time he left Iowa. He was a fantastic defensive player - not a shot-blocker because of shorter arms and limited athletic ability - but just a great positional defender and communicator as the leader of the defense (which was a huge reason why those Iowa teams were by far the best Fran has had at Iowa). He became a very good Rebounder by his Senior year. Offensively, I don't think he would have ever been anymore than what he was no matter where he went. He is just limited - for some of the reasons you listed above - but was valuable in many other ways.

Woodbury on last years team and this years would have been a HUGE asset and I think Iowa would be that much more formidable if they had him in the middle defensively and not having to worry about being a big scorer.

And Cook wasn't a Center. He was guy that wanted to have the ball in his hands and try to create from the perimeter and get to the hoop. He wanted to be like his buddy/HS teammate Jayson Tatum but doesn't have that kind of ability. One of my biggest issues with Fran (and I am a Fran fan) was his handling of Cook and giving him too much leeway as it was to be the focal point of the Offense. I think if Cook was more willing - and Fran and staff could have convinced him - that becoming a dominating PF who in the Big Ten, who crashed the boards, got a lot of garbage buckets on put backs, etc. and worried less about trying to create off the dribble and take mid-range jumpers, it would have helped the team and helped him maximize his game. Just didn't seem like that is how he saw himself and I am guessing that Fran was partly able to land Cook (who was a major coup recruiting) was because he told Cook he was going to give him the freedom to grow his game offensively.
 
He's a big boy for one...big and would be a big value add in this conference if he can give us some good minutes which he already has. Someone a couple of summers ago now pasted some very good, very impressive pics of Josh working out and a very nice stroke from the 3... I was glad to hear from Sute that Josh had his moments on Saturday which I am expecting this more and more from him..... Josh, like a lot of players need PT and more of it. Hopefully he will earn and get that opportunity more this season....

I am pulling for him cause he has the type of size that is a pain in the arse for teams and like Iowa to have to match up with....
I for one would be happy if he didn't spend one minute working on his stroke from the three. His value to this team will be to guard and clog the paint, bang with other bigs, and to grab a few rebounds. His offensive practice should be to improve his footwork and scoring around the basket. If he could score inside, the outside will open up for actual shooters.
 
I think you'll see Ulis and Perkins starting together. They've always played well together, and Frans teams are always low turnover teams. With Ahron handling the ball, and good free throw shooting I think he and Tony will be a really good back court. Love the other guys coming off the bench.

I agree that the starting 5 has been known for a while now

Ulis
Perkins
Patrick
Kris
Filip

The only question is whether Dasonte will eventually win the PG starting job. Regardless, Bowen & Payton are going to play a ton.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sheahawk
I would say Woodbury maxed out his ability by the time he left Iowa. He was a fantastic defensive player - not a shot-blocker because of shorter arms and limited athletic ability - but just a great positional defender and communicator as the leader of the defense (which was a huge reason why those Iowa teams were by far the best Fran has had at Iowa). He became a very good Rebounder by his Senior year. Offensively, I don't think he would have ever been anymore than what he was no matter where he went. He is just limited - for some of the reasons you listed above - but was valuable in many other ways.

Woodbury on last years team and this years would have been a HUGE asset and I think Iowa would be that much more formidable if they had him in the middle defensively and not having to worry about being a big scorer.

And Cook wasn't a Center. He was guy that wanted to have the ball in his hands and try to create from the perimeter and get to the hoop. He wanted to be like his buddy/HS teammate Jayson Tatum but doesn't have that kind of ability. One of my biggest issues with Fran (and I am a Fran fan) was his handling of Cook and giving him too much leeway as it was to be the focal point of the Offense. I think if Cook was more willing - and Fran and staff could have convinced him - that becoming a dominating PF who in the Big Ten, who crashed the boards, got a lot of garbage buckets on put backs, etc. and worried less about trying to create off the dribble and take mid-range jumpers, it would have helped the team and helped him maximize his game. Just didn't seem like that is how he saw himself and I am guessing that Fran was partly able to land Cook (who was a major coup recruiting) was because he told Cook he was going to give him the freedom to grow his game offensively.

Cook's ability to drive with either hand and finish put a TON of pressure on and drew a TON of fouls on opponents big men. Did he turn it over too often? probably but that was a better use of his abilities as it put other teams bigs on the bench in foul trouble. TC was a handful to defend unless you just clogged the lane.
 
I agree that the starting 5 has been known for a while now

Ulis
Perkins
Patrick
Kris
Filip

The only question is whether Dasonte will eventually win the PG starting job. Regardless, Bowen & Payton are going to play a ton.

Don't be surprised when that's not the starting 5

May come down to how well Tony can shoot the 3. If he can get close to 40% then that may keep him at the 2G, but it's been pretty well discussed and seen as shown in clip posted above at end of last year and what we've heard from the closes scrimmage, TP is playing a lot of PG because it allows Sandfort to be on the floor more and it opens the floor up a great deal for Tony, Patrick, and Kris to catch rip and drive their men.

I feel that our starters may look more like

Patrick McCaffery
Kris Murray
Filip Rebraca
Payton Sandfort
Tony Perkins

with the bench mixing in and allowing more flexibility with the starters.... Payton playing anywhere from 2,3,4. Tony at the 1,2. Kris Murray really anywhere 1-5.

Will be a lot of different combinations that can be out there to exploit or match up with opponents.

Josh Dix
Connor McCaffery
Josh Ogundele/Riley Mulvey
Ahron Ulis
Dasonte Bowen
 
I'm not sure that's much of an argument. While I certainly think Frans deserves a lot of credit for bringing in Luka, and SOME development, I'd say that LG did most of the work. Not sure that either Cook or Woodbury were markedly better when they left Iowa then they were when they got there.....Cook certainly played a bigger role, but I don't think his skill set took a big leap while he was a Hawk.....
You weren’t paying attention or don’t know much about basketball ball if you don’t think Cook improved while at Iowa. Most likely Woodbury as well but I don’t recall.
Yes, Luka put in the work to get better. All good/improving players do. Perhaps coaches get too much credit for player development. That being said, Fran puts his players in positions to excel. That’s where his coaching plays a role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mitjacks
I feel that our starters may look more like

Patrick McCaffery
Kris Murray
Filip Rebraca
Payton Sandfort
Tony Perkins

Jon Rothstein wrote about the B1G on Aug 8.

Some laughed at his starting 5 for Iowa, which was this:

Projected Starting 5:
G
Tony Perkins
G Payton Sandfort
F Patrick McCaffery
F Kris Murray
C Filip Rebraca

Projected Bench: Connor McCaffery, Josh Ogundele, Ahron Ulis, Riley Mulvey, Luc Laketa, Carter Kingsbury, Dasonte Bowen, Josh Dix

Key Losses: Keegan Murray, Jordan Bohannon

Key Newcomers: Dasonte Bowen, Josh Dix



Preseason All-Big Ten First Team
Kris Murray, Iowa
Cliff Omoruyi, Rutgers
Trayce Jackson-Davis, Indiana
Hunter Dickinson, Michigan
Zach Edey, Purdue



Big Ten Preseason Sleeper
Iowa



The FULL Story:
 
Cook's ability to drive with either hand and finish put a TON of pressure on and drew a TON of fouls on opponents big men. Did he turn it over too often? probably but that was a better use of his abilities as it put other teams bigs on the bench in foul trouble. TC was a handful to defend unless you just clogged the lane.
While I agree some of that is true, I am not sure the positives outweighed the negatives with the approach they took.

His last year his Advanced stats were not very good - he just wasn't a very efficient player. Like you said, TC was a TO machine. His defensive stats were very close to as bad as JBo and a not yet fully-formed Garza (who I think everyone can agree were pretty bad Defensive players at that point). That is pretty sad when you consider the athletic advantage Cook had over the majority of the players he played against. And Offensively, his advanced stats were worse than Garza, Weezy, JBo, and Baer (only surpassing Moss for the starters and don't get me started on him).

I'll grant you that there were a few advantages to having the ball in his hands at times (as you stated above) but even as a Soph, Garza was a more efficient player Offensively and likely the team (and I believe Cook) could have benefitted working the ball primarily through him and not Cook. Cook was a good player but I think could have been more dangerous if he played to his strengths more instead of trying to do things he wasn't capable of doing.
 
This team will be a true big or super athletic 4 away from being a very good team imo. Big problem not getting one of those in the portal.
 
You weren’t paying attention or don’t know much about basketball ball if you don’t think Cook improved while at Iowa. Most likely Woodbury as well but I don’t recall.
Yes, Luka put in the work to get better. All good/improving players do. Perhaps coaches get too much credit for player development. That being said, Fran puts his players in positions to excel. That’s where his coaching plays a role.
Okay, I don't know much about basketball. Had two sons play in college, one had D1 offers early on, and spent MANY summers in Des Moines and Iowa city at the invite only camps with him. His first year at Mullens Superstar camp at Drake was the last year Horner and Bruner were there and he got to play against both of them. I've been through the recruiting and meat market scene where there were 200 kids at these camps and I've followed Iowa basketball pre Lute. Do think what you want though. You might also read again what I said. Yes, he improved, but I would have expected that level of improvement from a 4 star player in his three years at Iowa. Yes Fran gets some credit for their improvement to a degree.

Here's what Fran is really good at. He does an excellent job of evaluating talent early on. He and his staff do a great job of building relationships with the players he recruits. He does a great job, (in some case to a fault), in building up the players confidence, and giving them the green light to play their game. Thats a real plus for players like Luka, and Keegan who thrived, but he's also had players he should have reigned in and he did not. Overall I think Frans done a solid job at Iowa. Still its concerning that we just lost back to back second round games to two totally different types of teams and it really appeared like he was out coached in both games.
 
Okay, I don't know much about basketball. Had two sons play in college, one had D1 offers early on, and spent MANY summers in Des Moines and Iowa city at the invite only camps with him. His first year at Mullens Superstar camp at Drake was the last year Horner and Bruner were there and he got to play against both of them. I've been through the recruiting and meat market scene with 200 kids at these camps and I've followed Iowa basketball pre Lute. Do think what you want though. You might also read again what I said. Yes, he improved, but I would have expected that level of improvement from a 4 star player in his three years at Iowa. Yes Fran gets some credit for their improvement to a degree.

Here's what Fran is really good at. He does an excellent job of evaluating talent early on. He and his staff do a great job of building relationships with the players he recruits. He does a great job, (in some case to a fault), in building up the players confidence, and giving them the green light to play their game. Thats a real plus for players like Luka, and Keegan who thrived, but he's also had players he should have reigned in and he did not. Overall I think Frans done a solid job at Iowa. Still its concerning that we just lost back to back second round games to two totally different types of teams and it really appeared like he was out coached in both games.
I'd say a lot more have thrived under Fran's tutelage than not. Gatens, Marble, White, Jok and Uthoff are all first team All Big guys that I think Fran got the most out of. Who do you think he was supposed to have "reigned in"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: perryhawk
Still its concerning that we just lost back to back second round games to two totally different types of teams and it really appeared like he was out coached in both games.
But it is not significant we beat 4 teams in 4 days to defeat Purdue to win the B1G tournament? Come on. I think Fran is as good as anyone at developing players. He has to, as he can't just go out and get a stable full of 5 stars.
 
Okay, I don't know much about basketball. Had two sons play in college, one had D1 offers early on, and spent MANY summers in Des Moines and Iowa city at the invite only camps with him. His first year at Mullens Superstar camp at Drake was the last year Horner and Bruner were there and he got to play against both of them. I've been through the recruiting and meat market scene where there were 200 kids at these camps and I've followed Iowa basketball pre Lute. Do think what you want though. You might also read again what I said. Yes, he improved, but I would have expected that level of improvement from a 4 star player in his three years at Iowa. Yes Fran gets some credit for their improvement to a degree.

Here's what Fran is really good at. He does an excellent job of evaluating talent early on. He and his staff do a great job of building relationships with the players he recruits. He does a great job, (in some case to a fault), in building up the players confidence, and giving them the green light to play their game. Thats a real plus for players like Luka, and Keegan who thrived, but he's also had players he should have reigned in and he did not. Overall I think Frans done a solid job at Iowa. Still its concerning that we just lost back to back second round games to two totally different types of teams and it really appeared like he was out coached in both games.
Agree on all what you said about Fran. Confidence being the big one.

Whether you know anything about BB or not, I thought Cook improved drastically from his Freshman to Junior years. I guess we can disagree on that point.
 
I'd say a lot more have thrived under Fran's tutelage than not. Gatens, Marble, White, Jok and Uthoff are all first team All Big guys that I think Fran got the most out of. Who do you think he was supposed to have "reigned in"?
I'm not saying Fran gets no credit for developing players. My main point was the two players that were brought up originally. I still think as a 4 star Cook improved marginally. I would expect a player with is athletisism to improve over his college career. He did, just don't think his skill level really got that much better. The other was Woodbury. Again Woody was a top 50 recruit with major offers. He was always a really good defensive post, although due to his physical limitation not a rim protector, but solid on defense. His offense was limited, and didn't really get much better over 4 years, again considering a player at that level should certainly improve some over his career.

White and Marble are true Fran success stories. I think mostly because of the confidence he instilled in them. Jok was a top FIVE to TEN recruit at one point before his leg injury. I think he and Utoff would have done well at most schools just given their natural talent. Utoff is the one guy before Keegan came along, that I was sure would make a living in the NBA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mitjacks
But it is not significant we beat 4 teams in 4 days to defeat Purdue to win the B1G tournament? Come on. I think Fran is as good as anyone at developing players. He has to, as he can't just go out and get a stable full of 5 stars.
Of course the BIG tourney run was great. The players took it upon themselves, and certainly Fran gets some credit for that. We got major performances up and down the roster. Keegan, PMac, JBO, TP, hell PS off the bench with some clutch shots. Do you feel like Fan did a great job coaching in the game against Richmond? OR Oregon the year before?
 
Of course the BIG tourney run was great. The players took it upon themselves, and certainly Fran gets some credit for that. We got major performances up and down the roster. Keegan, PMac, JBO, TP, hell PS off the bench with some clutch shots. Do you feel like Fan did a great job coaching in the game against Richmond? OR Oregon the year before?
Well I don't know about Richmond but there were some very impactful health situations on the team which caused the Oregon loss. Don't want to really get into it here as it would just sound like making excuses which I don't want to do. Probably should not even mention it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: perryhawk
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT