Shock Poll Reveals Massive Voter Fraud
- Thread starter Scruddy
- Start date
Leading Report - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
mediabiasfactcheck.com
🤣🤡
lol. In for another rough day. Much like Giuliani, you’d of had the truth come out much earlier in any conspiracy the size the crazies claim.
Sure you don't
Well insert whatever far right news source/social media/friends you do.
I'm mean it's not that hard to figure out why voting hit record high when more people had easier access to voting. But, hey, one day you'll get there.
I know this is hard for many on here to understand, but I get my news from all outlets. That way I can put enough together that the story is somewhere in the middle. You should try it sometime, it's a great way of seeing both sides are full of sh*t!.
If that was true you wouldn't be skeptical about how more people voted by having easier access
All your posts, every one, is super far right. That doesn't happen if you get information from all sides. Good try though. Keep swinging one day you'll make contact
I will not ever question more people having easier access to voting. That's not the subject however, it's the checks and balances on the votes being legit.
To an extremely far leftist, ya, I guess someone in the middle would look "super far right".
And despite republicans turning over every possible rock, they've uncovered zero evidence to suggest those checks/balances were seriously compromised - they instead decried the length of time it took to count all the votes, ignoring that every time they were doing so due to the election rules of that given state.
It's having nothing to do with Republicans. Are the votes going into the machine legit or not? Because once they go into the machine, they are considered legit. Al Gore found that out.
republicans are the only ones who are pushing the narrative that they’re not.
everything we have learned about our elections is that they overwhelmingly were legit ballots.
Then the Dems need to do a better job of making sure (I and other voters) feel secure with my vote. When myself and other of my friends stop getting multiple voting ballots in the mail and my friend's wife (who's been dead for 7 years) stop getting ballots, then I will feel secure with the process.
I live in a blue state and (NO) none of use voted more than once.
Ever reached out to inquire why you apparently got multiple ballots? Don’t know where you live or how they decide who gets mail ballots and when.
i don’t know what else democrats can do to make sure you feel secure with your vote. Election after election, they’re conducted regularly, and with rare hiccups or instances of genuine fraud. It’s impossible to prove a negative, that our elections aren’t ALREADY secure. Could they be made more sure? Possibly, but difficult to do on a large scale given the decentralized nature of our election systems.
republicans meanwhile, get the easy job and shout fraud whenever they see an election result they don’t like. Two separate republican presidents have created commissions to investigate elections…and found nothing substantial.
at the same time, in recent years, there HAS been work on trying to clean up the voting process - ERIC, that is actually quite promising. It does however require cooperation between states to work, and I’ll give you three guesses which party has had states it controls pull out recently.
Home - ERIC, Inc.
ericstates.org
And yet, no arrests.
Despite those being permanent voting records.
Sounds like a big ol' load of BS to me....
This simply doesn't happen.
In Colorado, we get ONE ballot.
The envelope is bar-coded to that ballot and voter.
If the signature on the envelope doesn't match, it gets set aside to contact the voter to verify. Dead people don't verify their ballots in person.
If I do not receive the mailed ballot, they will mail another, and the barcode for the original envelope is flagged/blocked.
You folks keep making shit up about how mail-in ballots work, because you have no idea how they work.
EDIT: Oh, and they EMAIL me when they send out my mailed ballot to look for it. And the EMAIL me when they RECEIVE my dropped-off or mailed-in ballot, so I KNOW they received it.
Then, they EMAIL me, again, to confirm they verified my signature on the envelope and the ballot WILL be counted.
It's super-easy, and super-secure. I can even give them my phone # to text that same ballot info to me, so I know immediately when it is mailed, received, and counted.
Last edited:
Actually, a lot of posters here say voter fraud doesn't happen. The posters who admit to it are much like you, and say it's not widespread.
Bush won the 2000 election by 537 votes. No way to prove it, but my guess is more than 537 people in Palm Beach County voted in Florida and some other state as well. That's the type of fraud that is most difficult to prove.
No; they say voter fraud is very rare, and generally caught.
Because voting records are permanent.
If you, and the GOP, want to claim "thousands" of Democrat voters who were dead, voted, then all you have to do, is pull those voting records and identify the death records/certificates which would prove it.
However, that evidence seems in short supply for you.
It is actually isn't that difficult to prove.
You simply pull up the voting records for the two precincts they voted in. Because those voting records are PERMANENT. And it IS possible to go back and find anyone who voted in two places.
When you commit voting fraud, you generate a permanent paper trail for someone to catch it.
who has said fraud doesn't happen? The only thing i've ever seen written is that it is so insignificant as to not affect results.
And
Generally what I see "in the news" being prosecuted is more often than not, republican.
Absolutely true.
In fact, the former Colorado RNC Chair, himself, got indicted for voter fraud, when he sent in his wife's/GF's absentee ballot. The signature did not match, so they did not count it.
At trial, he blamed a "diabetic episode" for his crime.
You can Google up that info, because it was reported on here years back.
Woman Arrested for Voter Fraud Scheme
An Iowa woman was arrested today in Sioux City for her role in an alleged voter fraud scheme during the Iowa 2020 primary and general elections.
Found a local one in .2 seconds of searching lol
That is someone who was attempting to GET absentee ballots.Woman Arrested for Voter Fraud Scheme
An Iowa woman was arrested today in Sioux City for her role in an alleged voter fraud scheme during the Iowa 2020 primary and general elections.www.justice.gov
Found a local one in .2 seconds of searching lol
And was CAUGHT.
This, AGAIN, is not an example of "voter fraud". It is Voter Registration Fraud. And, AGAIN, not that difficult to figure out. In this case (as in most - which was also in an old Heritage Foundation Report) MOST of these cases are NOT national elections, they are local races.
Translation: "It took me .2 seconds to NOT find something supporting my claim of "massive voter fraud".
The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map
The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map is an interactive tool providing a sampling of proven instances of election fraud across the U.S. From @HeritageDataviz
www.heritage.org
Yawwwwwnnnn
YepThe Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map
The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map is an interactive tool providing a sampling of proven instances of election fraud across the U.S. From @HeritageDataviz
Yawwwwwnnnn
Same Heritage Foundation that found something like 300 actual instances of "voter fraud" over a couple of decades. With the LARGE MAJORITY of them being local elections, not Presidential or Congressional.
Steven CurtisThe Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map
The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map is an interactive tool providing a sampling of proven instances of election fraud across the U.S. From @HeritageDataviz
Yawwwwwnnnn
Steven Curtis, the former head of the Colorado Republican Party, was charged with a misdemeanor election mail-in ballot offense, as well as one count of forgery of a public record. It was revealed through handwriting analysis that Curtis forged his ex-wife's name on her ballot and mailed it in. He was found guilty and sentenced to four years probation and 300 hours of community service.
Source: https://herit.ag/2UV4aj5, https://herit.ag/3ArntjL
Election Year: 2020
Name: Janis M. Cummer, also known as Jan Wilson
Party Affiliation: Republican (at the time of the offense)[5]
Offense and Sentencing:
Janis M. Cummer pleaded not guilty in July 2020 to one misdemeanor charge of voting twice in a primary election.[6] Cummer was found guilty on 2/10/2021 and fined $500 plus costs.[7]
Party Affiliation:
Republican
Name: Janis M. Cummer, also known as Jan Wilson
Party Affiliation: Republican (at the time of the offense)[5]
Offense and Sentencing:
Janis M. Cummer pleaded not guilty in July 2020 to one misdemeanor charge of voting twice in a primary election.[6] Cummer was found guilty on 2/10/2021 and fined $500 plus costs.[7]
Party Affiliation:
Republican
- There have been 290 convictions across 36 states for voter fraud in all US elections between 2016 and 2020.
- 140 convictions related to a presidential or congressional race: 141 cases involved one vote, three cases had seven votes or less, and two cases had an unknown number of votes.
- The political affiliations are known for 164 defendants: 38.4% of those convicted were Democrats, 42.1% were Republicans, while the remainder were Independent, nonpartisan, or unaffiliated.
- Donald Trump lost the 2016 popular vote by 2.8 million votes and the 2020 election by 7 million votes.
Voter Fraud Convictions in the 2016-2020 Elections - 2020Election.org
Last updated November 29, 2023 Quick Facts: Since 2012, Donald Trump and many other Republicans have claimed there was substantial voter fraud in US elections and that, if not for that fraud, Trump would have won the popular vote in the 2016 election (he lost by 2,868,686 million votes), and...
the2020election.org
Widespread? Not at all.
A total of about 140 cases for the national elections combined, between 2016 and 2020.
Your own Heritage link finds 1200 dating back to 2000, which is a mixture of local and national elections.
Hardly "widespread"; in fact, pretty rare.
Here's 12 minutes of democrats crying that the 2016 election was stolen from them 😅
'Fabricated'?
That's what the intel now has clearly shown us. Putin manipulated our election in 2016. That IS the conclusion of the Senate Intel Committee (chaired by Republicans)
