If Joe molested his daughter I hope she finds the courage to make formal accusations that can be tried in a criminal or civil court.
Should Trump be required to register as a sexual offender?
- Thread starter sabula
- Start date
For sexual assault? You bet. Only Trump has been found liable for it. This is why Rs lack critical thinking skills. You try both siding rape.
Use the search function and tell me where I support Biden. I hate Trump. There is a difference. Edit: You have a problem understanding how to read articles. Easily duped.
Last edited:
I read the article about the UCLA med school. You chose to disbelieve it, that’s fair.
Lol you rode DeSantis' nuts for years and now you want to take a hard line against pedophiles?
Wasn’t it you who was knocking me for posting the article about UCLAs medical school?
OMG. You seriously can't comprehend an article. What is wrong with you? Are you trying to play a SW Iowa Evangelical Christian Chiropractor character?
lol, back to it. Why are you triggered by that report? Do you doubt the veracity of it? Do you have a reason to think I bought it hook line and sinker? I posted it, because I thought it was funny and telling alot about how far we have become. The sources of media and news we have today all have bias, and play to their audience. It’s why I watch MSNBC, to see where the truth is, in between conservative and liberal views.
SW Iowa, Evangelical Christian, Chiropractor and a tinge of muscle head. I got it right?
So, nothing?
SW Iowa, Evangelical Christian, Chiropractor and a tinge of muscle head. I got it right?
JFC. You are ****in dense. I really hope you are not real. I assume you aren't as nobody would be stupid enough to really post their own pic in their avatar. You would actually have to be a moran to do that in today's age.
You’re proving my point, you didn’t agree with the Twitter post I linked. You think there is no truth to it. That’s fine. Just because you don’t agree or want to believe something, doesn’t mean there is no truth to it. No need to attack me, if you’re so much smarter at article comprehension, do your fellow man a service and tell me what in missed, I’m listening.
It was easily proved incorrect. I can't believe I am engaging with you. Should we revisit the thread or is it gone? One last time. It was an easy article to pick apart.
You didn’t provide evidence it was incorrect, just knocked the source, which I understand. It was, in these times not out of the realm of possibility that it was true, or at least parts were true.
