If the law says theachers can be armed but they aren't, and if there's a school shooting where kids under their supervision are hurt or killed, can they/should they be held responsible in any way?
If the law says theachers can be armed but they aren't, and if there's a school shooting where kids under their supervision are hurt or killed, can they/should they be held responsible in any way?
WTF??If the law says theachers can be armed but they aren't, and if there's a school shooting where kids under their supervision are hurt or killed, can they/should they be held responsible in any way?
WTF??There is a reason why these people are teachers and not in the military. Most people don't have the ability or mindset to put themselves in danger to stop a shooter.
Yes some teachers could do it, but they are the exception, not the rule.
I could.Yes some teachers could do it, but they are the exception, not the rule.
The three teachers in my building who are ex-military want nothing to do with being armed in school and think it's a terrible idea.There is a reason why these people are teachers and not in the military. Most people don't have the ability or mindset to put themselves in danger to stop a shooter.
Yes some teachers could do it, but they are the exception, not the rule.
Aren't you a teacher? You think you should be responsible if a shooter shoots up the school?WTF??
Homework assignments would seldom be late for the armed teachers.If there are going to be guns in schools I am in favor of the main school secretary having one. They know how to get shit done and with a gun in hand just think how smooth schools would run.
Hey, at least I have ideas.