ADVERTISEMENT

Should we adopt Denmark's anti immigration policies?

Well?

  • I'm a Bernie fan and to make us more like Denmark, I would accept their strict immigration policies.

    Votes: 6 42.9%
  • I'm a Bernie fan and I like Denmark, but Their immigration policies are too strict. No thanks.

    Votes: 2 14.3%
  • I'm not a Bernie fan and don't want Denmark's "socialism" but I'd like their immigration policies.

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • Not a Bernie fan but would be willing to accept Denmark's economic style if we could keep people out

    Votes: 1 7.1%

  • Total voters
    14
What does it reveal? That I'm trolling your ignorance?
The same thing this reveals, that you can't even comprehend English. I'm seeking information. I openly admitted my ignorance and asked for help. Multiple times. You're inability to digest and understand that point says far more about your mind than it does mine. Stay in school little one.
 
This thread could be titled "Grass is Green"

YS - "see here, grass is green"

Nat - "my opinion is it is not"

22* - "here is a report from grass experts giving their opinion that grass is green"

Nat - "that still doesn't give me indisputable evidence of grasses greenness."

22* - "here is the government saying that grass can likely not be any other color than green"

Nat - "still don't understand this concept of green. Need to have undisputed evidence that grass is really not something else. Otherwise grass must be any other color than green"

Slieb - "you're dominating Broseph. High five!"

YS - "you're making an extreme effort to not look at grasses greenness."

Nat - "I've seen green and grass ain't it"

Nole - "you're playing a game to try and ignore green grass."

Nat - "no one truly understands the complexity of grass, or chlorophyll. I win!!"

Slieb - "bro, I'm going to name my next ficus after you!"

Nat - "I play HROT like a mofo"
 
Last edited:
Like I said before, you don't care about the truth. You only care about the party. You're a pro-freedom guy, that is only in favor of freedoms that you agree with. LOL!
And you're an anti freedom guy, we understand each other perfectly.
 
The same thing this reveals, that you can't even comprehend English. I'm seeking information. I openly admitted my ignorance and asked for help. Multiple times. You're inability to digest and understand that point says far more about your mind than it does mine. Stay in school little one.

GTFO of here. I love your posting style. You always say that you're seeking information, but you automatically bypass any information not given to you by your lord and master. You can call yourself "inquisitive" all you want. That doesn't make it so. :D
 
This thread could be titled "Grass is Green"

YS - "see here, grass is green"

Nat - "my opinion is it is not"

22* - "here is a report from grass experts giving there opinion that grass is green"

Nat - "that still doesn't give me indisputable evidence of grasses greeness."

22* - "here is the government saying that grass can likely not be any other color than green"

Nat - "still don't understand this concept of green. Need to have undisputed evidence that grass is really not something else. Otherwise grass must be any other color than green"

Slieb - "you're dominating Broseph. High five!"

YS - "you're making an extreme effort to not look at grasses greenness."

Nat - "I've seen green and grass ain't it"

Nole - "you're playing a game to try and ignore green grass."

Nat - "noone truly understands the complexity of grass or chlorophyll. I win."

Slieb - "bro, I'm going to name my next ficus after you!"

Nat - "I play HROT like a mofo"
change green to brown and I think we may be getting close to the truth.
 
GTFO of here. I love your posting style. You always say that you're seeking information, but you automatically bypass any information not given to you by your lord and master. You can call yourself "inquisitive" all you want. That doesn't make it so. :D
Thank you for this, it was another validation.
 
Your rope-a-dope is unmatchable. Of course, you don't ever post anything intellectual...but whatever.
Not being recognized for intellectual contributions when you admit you are seeking intellectual input isn't an insult. Needing to have that explained to you, is however.
 
700 millions dollars isn't an economic problem? Good to know. I'm sure that you can cover this yourself.

You're really really not showing your newly found so called economic prowess in this thread.

Just because I'm sick of reading page after page without any sort of reasonable link, I found one for you.

It is a summary of a paper that takes the opposite side of a CIS finding (you'll remember them as the group that is in one of the whole TWO links anyone has provided in this thread for why immigration is bad for the economy). Please feel free to use some analysis and data to refute what this is saying. I'll be back this evening and can't wait to see your brilliance in action.

https://www.uschamber.com/above-the-fold/immigrants-are-good-the-economy

That was in 15 seconds of google searching. I also found an article that, while advocating for a different immigration policy than we currently employ, also provides some evidence that immigrants may not be a net drag on the economy.

"Immigration also creates businesses. The Partnership for a New American Economy estimates that immigrants are nearly 50 percent more likely to start a business than native-born workers. These businesses create jobs and bring more customers into the supply chain, which in turn generates more revenue for local governments and resources for communities across America. It is important to note that immigrants or their children founded more than 40 percent of U.S. Fortune 500 companies — turning their American dreams into American jobs. That is just one reason why high-skilled immigrants are so critical to growth."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/18/why-immigration-is-good-for-us-growth/


So. Mr. Economic Guru. Let's have the case for the other side. Kthxbye.
 
You're really really not showing your newly found so called economic prowess in this thread.

Just because I'm sick of reading page after page without any sort of reasonable link, I found one for you.

It is a summary of a paper that takes the opposite side of a CIS finding (you'll remember them as the group that is in one of the whole TWO links anyone has provided in this thread for why immigration is bad for the economy). Please feel free to use some analysis and data to refute what this is saying. I'll be back this evening and can't wait to see your brilliance in action.

https://www.uschamber.com/above-the-fold/immigrants-are-good-the-economy

That was in 15 seconds of google searching. I also found an article that, while advocating for a different immigration policy than we currently employ, also provides some evidence that immigrants may not be a net drag on the economy.

"Immigration also creates businesses. The Partnership for a New American Economy estimates that immigrants are nearly 50 percent more likely to start a business than native-born workers. These businesses create jobs and bring more customers into the supply chain, which in turn generates more revenue for local governments and resources for communities across America. It is important to note that immigrants or their children founded more than 40 percent of U.S. Fortune 500 companies — turning their American dreams into American jobs. That is just one reason why high-skilled immigrants are so critical to growth."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/18/why-immigration-is-good-for-us-growth/


So. Mr. Economic Guru. Let's have the case for the other side. Kthxbye.

I'm not against immigration. I've already stated that in this thread. Immigration is what made this country great.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT