You're really really not showing your newly found so called economic prowess in this thread.
Just because I'm sick of reading page after page without any sort of reasonable link, I found one for you.
It is a summary of a paper that takes the opposite side of a CIS finding (you'll remember them as the group that is in one of the whole TWO links anyone has provided in this thread for why immigration is bad for the economy). Please feel free to use some analysis and data to refute what this is saying. I'll be back this evening and can't wait to see your brilliance in action.
https://www.uschamber.com/above-the-fold/immigrants-are-good-the-economy
That was in 15 seconds of google searching. I also found an article that, while advocating for a different immigration policy than we currently employ, also provides some evidence that immigrants may not be a net drag on the economy.
"Immigration also creates businesses. The Partnership for a New American Economy estimates that immigrants are nearly 50 percent more likely to start a business than native-born workers. These businesses create jobs and bring more customers into the supply chain, which in turn generates more revenue for local governments and resources for communities across America. It is important to note that immigrants or their children founded more than 40 percent of U.S. Fortune 500 companies — turning their American dreams into American jobs. That is just one reason why high-skilled immigrants are so critical to growth."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/18/why-immigration-is-good-for-us-growth/
So. Mr. Economic Guru. Let's have the case for the other side. Kthxbye.