Maybe, just maybe, Cade is the starter because he only has one year. This one. Sullivan is next years starter, and maybe your best QB. Why risk getting him hurt when maybe Cade will be serviceable?
SI article...
- Thread starter obfuscating
- Start date
There are times when they play "not to lose". You can't be serious...don't play him because he might get hurt?
Coaches play to win.... Hence, not to lose. What I said, you play Cade because he only has one year to play. Why park him on the bench? Kirk thinks Cade is capable of winning games. He is. Cade is obviously out grading the others in practice.
Sully is your Starter next year if he beats out the younger guys. Why risk getting him hurt?
Just a theory. Your entitled to your own.
This statement is not playing to win. This statement is playing to win another day. If in this example, another year.
By this theory, you would be admitting that KF is not playing the best player and is not giving his team the best chance to win right now. Coaches who want to win do not play the second best, or "save" the best guy for the next year. That would actually be quite stupid given the state of the transfer portal.
Last edited:
