Wow. What came out of it?? You didn't pay attention? I assume no since you think it is equal to Hunter's laptop. An attack on the US Capitol where people were looking to at minimum injure the Vice President and House Speaker is basically a nothingburger to you?? Read and learn because you sure as hell didn't know everything in their report. The only people who went before the committee were the ones willing to tell the truth UNDER OATH. Nobody who said Trump had nothing to do with anything would testify UNDER OATH. Why? Because they would have to lie to protect him.
Here are some of the takeaways from the panel's initial report, which includes 17 key findings and four criminal referrals against former President Donald Trump.
www.pbs.org
Your last sentence is correct...if his name was Bob Smith he would have been prosecuted for it a long time ago...along with every other illegal act Bob Smith committed. Instead, Trump is still being protected though we all know he's a freaking criminal who belongs in prison. Yes, this is the weakest of his indictments. I WANT to know what he did with the files that he stole that are actually missing top secret documents, who has them now, and what they gave Trump for them.
Again, lets all unify to eliminate the worst stain in our nation's history and then we can all go back to fighting over policy. Like I said, one of the biggest lunatics on the board agrees with you. That means to reset what you're saying.
Why do you lie? Where did I say it was equal to anything? This fantasy world you create for yourself is quite something. One poster mentioned that congress didn’t pass a bill because they were doing something with Hunter. Then said they also did something with January 6th. A lot of wasted time.
And again, it wasn’t a fact finding mission. They weren’t interested in getting to the bottom of anything. They wanted to burn Trump and blame him for it on national tv for a few months and that’s what they did.
As for nutbags who like my posts, you should have some self awareness and take a peek at the same few losers you have in your fan club. Besides, the thousand of laughing emojis you have given me fill me with the knowledge that each post is right on the money.
As for Bob Smith being charged years ago. I agree. Because that’s when they were misdemeanors. Remember? They waited out the statutes of limitations to be able to up-charge them. And just before the election. What a coincidence!
I love your last bit about how everyone needs to come together to get rid of Trump, regardless of laws or procedures. While constantly decrying the possibilities of the “end of Democracy”. It’s obvious you just want democracy to die, but by your way of choosing. Not anyone else’s.
Now back to the 1/6 committee…
They didn’t even question the Chief of Capitol Police. Wonder why? Oh yeah… that’s why…
“If the intelligence had been accurately reported and the FBI and DHS had followed their policies and established practices, I wouldn’t be sitting here today,” he told the panel.
“This could have been preventable if we had gotten the intelligence they had,” he later told Virginia Republican Morgan Griffith.
Sund told the panel: “Significant intelligence existed that individuals were plotting to storm the Capitol building, target lawmakers and discussing shooting my officers. And yet, no intel agencies or units sounded the alarm. We were blindsided. Intelligence failed operations. The January 6 attack at the Capitol was preventable.”
Sund told the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight that besides intelligence failures, the U.S. National Guard had also been instructed not to assist Capitol Police out of concern for political “optics.”