Let's answer some questions here:
-Are students more likely to fall victim to losing interest, getting lazy, dropping out or failing like some that actually paid for it have? If some lack motivation while paying, what happens for those not paying?
-Do all institutions go by this free plan? As in, does Harvard tuition equal DMACC tuition....which would be free. If some are free and some aren't, then what does that do to the not free schools?
-How many chances do you get if you fail? Or is it just always free? Do you have a limit and if so, what happens if you got that limit? No more education for you?
-What all do you get for free? Free room, free tuition, free books, etc? What is a student fiscally responsible for?
-How do you deal with the numbers of student enrollments? If the spots available are simply limited? If it is free now, isn't that an automatic jump in student populations that schools would need YEARS to compensate for.
-If it's free, then would academic standards for who gets into school matter? If it does still matter, then does it become a matter of who scores higher on their SAT's/ACT's? If so, then how does that really change anything, if for say, the class sizes stay the same, due to lack of budge for expansions? Which would be very likely as nothing is unlimited.
-Are there age restrictions? Or are there any age groups that get first served? What happens when older people decide they want to up their education and start claiming for spots that most people may believe should be reserved for the youthful?
-Does the taxpayer in the workforce get pushed aside for the younger unemployed person as far as enrollment goes? Is it fair for someone who is simply unemployed to get first dibs over someone who works and is actually paying their share into this? What if the one that works is in a dead end job? Questions, questions.
-If tax money is what makes it free, then should not the taxpayer have a say in the standards of enrollment, student qualifications and results? If we were to be forced into getting taxed for this, what guarantee does the government promise to students and the tax payers? What obligations is the government responsible for?
-What obligations do the students have whilat receiving this for free, being they likely won't have the time to work full-time jobs and therefore aren't paying into it as much as someone on the job force is. What do they do as far as contributions go? It's free, they should at least have some responsibility measures for what they get for free.
How the hell does free college work in the end?
-Are students more likely to fall victim to losing interest, getting lazy, dropping out or failing like some that actually paid for it have? If some lack motivation while paying, what happens for those not paying?
-Do all institutions go by this free plan? As in, does Harvard tuition equal DMACC tuition....which would be free. If some are free and some aren't, then what does that do to the not free schools?
-How many chances do you get if you fail? Or is it just always free? Do you have a limit and if so, what happens if you got that limit? No more education for you?
-What all do you get for free? Free room, free tuition, free books, etc? What is a student fiscally responsible for?
-How do you deal with the numbers of student enrollments? If the spots available are simply limited? If it is free now, isn't that an automatic jump in student populations that schools would need YEARS to compensate for.
-If it's free, then would academic standards for who gets into school matter? If it does still matter, then does it become a matter of who scores higher on their SAT's/ACT's? If so, then how does that really change anything, if for say, the class sizes stay the same, due to lack of budge for expansions? Which would be very likely as nothing is unlimited.
-Are there age restrictions? Or are there any age groups that get first served? What happens when older people decide they want to up their education and start claiming for spots that most people may believe should be reserved for the youthful?
-Does the taxpayer in the workforce get pushed aside for the younger unemployed person as far as enrollment goes? Is it fair for someone who is simply unemployed to get first dibs over someone who works and is actually paying their share into this? What if the one that works is in a dead end job? Questions, questions.
-If tax money is what makes it free, then should not the taxpayer have a say in the standards of enrollment, student qualifications and results? If we were to be forced into getting taxed for this, what guarantee does the government promise to students and the tax payers? What obligations is the government responsible for?
-What obligations do the students have whilat receiving this for free, being they likely won't have the time to work full-time jobs and therefore aren't paying into it as much as someone on the job force is. What do they do as far as contributions go? It's free, they should at least have some responsibility measures for what they get for free.
How the hell does free college work in the end?
Last edited:
