Special Council Jack Smith's 1st Volume of Trump's crimes

[Tom Paris]

I can't understand how today's democrats liked Gabbard, Kennedy, Musk and Trump when they were democrats but now that the democratic party doesn't rep them they despise them because of an initial next to their name. They are the same people. Talk about a brainwashed society. I hate both parties and they are both evil but don't let a little letter fool you! The diehards will continue their rhetoric on whatever side they lean.

There was a post on this board about who extremist are... If you have never voted for someone from the other side then you are part of the problem.

 

[sober_teacher]

Does the truth bother you? You guys like indictments and special counsels and Grand Jury reports...

Here's an excerpt from the Florida Grand Jury's report on Covid-19 and the "vaccines"

To see the truth of this, one needs look no further than the COVID-19 vaccines, all three of which were associated with safety issues necessitating FDA intervention. Janssen's AD26.COV2.S vaccine was granted Emergency Use Authorization on February 27, 2021, but was subsequently connected via pharmacovigilance to a rare event known as cerebral venous sinus -60-thrombosis. This SAE, which-as of April 2021-had been reported just six times after the administration of 6.8 million doses of AD26.COV2.S, was much too rare to have been seen in Janssen's 43,000 clinical trial participants. Once the signal was uncovered, the FDA and CDC promptly issued a joint statement recommending a "pause" in the marketing of AD26.COV2.S and informing the public of the SAE's existence and its tendency to occur in women-to that point, exclusively in women aged 18-48. The FDA also promptly commenced an emergency meeting of the ACIP to decide the best way forward. The ACIP examined the available data and chose to reaffirm its prior recommendation. The marketing of AD26.COV2.S resumed with a warning regarding the "danger of rare blood clots after vaccination." In July of 2021, AD26.COV2.S was associated with a second SAE, Guillain-Barre syndrome. This time, pharmacovigilance uncovered 100 preliminary reports-including one death-from a denominator of approximately 12.5 million administered doses. After examining the issue, the FDA announced "revisions to the vaccine recipient and vaccination provider fact sheets for the Janssen (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine to include information pertaining to an observed increased risk of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) following vaccination." Janssen's vaccine may have been the first to uncover unexpected safety events via pharmacovigilance, but Pfizer's BNT162b2 and Moderna's MRNA-1273 were not far behind. In July of 2021, both vaccines were formally associated by the ACIP with rare instances of myocarditis and pericarditis (which we will explore in detail below). This serves to underscore the central thesis of the 2017 research study: The discovery of new SAEs after pharmacovigilance of biologics-including vaccines-that have already been found to be "safe and effective" by the FDA is unfortunate; to some extent, it is unavoidable, but it is not uncommon. Ordinarily, post-approval pharmacovigilance will have two primary dimensions: (1) A set of required "postmarketing studies," which often involve specific questions or issues that arise from either the clinical trials or from some prior form of licensure (like an EUA); and (2) a more generalized obligation for a sponsor to conduct "postmarketing surveillance," gathering outcome data from a variety of sources to develop a robust safety profile on its product and uncover infrequent safety events that may represent significant health risks.

To make this easy:

Pharma admits to these: Blood Clots, Guillain-Barre, myocarditis and pericarditis.

If I were to inject you with something like a chemical, and the result is blood clots, or GBS, or myocarditis, would you say that I poisoned you?

By this logic all medications are poison as well.

 

[Tom Paris]

So everything is "conspiracy" which means a plausible story has to be created by the prosecution, meaning no real evidence of crime.

34 count felon. Not to mention dozens of boxes of stolen top secret documents. Shame on you.

 

[KFsdisciple]

By this logic all medications are poison as well.

Certainly not all medications are poison, but they are required to be honest about side effects go through years often decades of research before coming to market.

 

[fsu1jreed]

Imagine being so stupid that being indicted makes you more inclined to vote for somebody so long as that criminal cries about it enough.

That's how stupid MAGA is

 

[sober_teacher]

Certainly not all medications are poison, but they are required to be honest about side effects go through years often decades of research before coming to market.

And they did so as soon as they could here as well given the rush of the situation.

Calling the vaccines position is stupid and you know it.

 

[KFsdisciple]

And they did so as soon as they could here as well given the rush of the situation.

Calling the vaccines position is stupid and you know it.

It's on par with calling them "safe and effective" - neither position mine or that one is accurate.

 

[sober_teacher]

It's on par with calling them "safe and effective" - neither position mine or that one is accurate.

Except they were, just not as safe and/or effective as they’d have been under normal circumstances.

There’s very few vaccines/medications that are 100% effective with no side effects.

 

[KFsdisciple]

Except they were, just not as safe and/or effective as they’d have been under normal circumstances.

There’s very few vaccines/medications that are 100% effective with no side effects.

but when medications have known side effects, it's not hard to find them. If you read the report, they admitted they KNEW in trials of certain side effects but it was months later before it came out. They also tried to hide what they knew and when they knew it for 55 years according to Reuters.

Wait what? FDA wants 55 years to process FOIA request over vaccine data

Freedom of Information Act requests are rarely speedy, but when a group of scientists asked the federal government to share the data it relied upon in licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, the response went beyond typical bureaucratic foot-dragging.

www.reuters.com

Link

(Reuters) - Freedom of Information Act requests are rarely speedy, but when a group of scientists asked the federal government to share the data it relied upon in licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, the response went beyond typical bureaucratic foot-dragging.
As in 55 years beyond.
That’s how long the Food & Drug Administration in court papers this week proposes it should be given to review and release the trove of vaccine-related documents responsive to the request. If a federal judge in Texas agrees, plaintiffs Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency can expect to see the full record in 2076.

 

[sober_teacher]

but when medications have known side effects, it's not hard to find them. If you read the report, they admitted they KNEW in trials of certain side effects but it was months later before it came out. They also tried to hide what they knew and when they knew it for 55 years according to Reuters.

Wait what? FDA wants 55 years to process FOIA request over vaccine data

Freedom of Information Act requests are rarely speedy, but when a group of scientists asked the federal government to share the data it relied upon in licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, the response went beyond typical bureaucratic foot-dragging.

www.reuters.com

Link

(Reuters) - Freedom of Information Act requests are rarely speedy, but when a group of scientists asked the federal government to share the data it relied upon in licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, the response went beyond typical bureaucratic foot-dragging.
As in 55 years beyond.
That’s how long the Food & Drug Administration in court papers this week proposes it should be given to review and release the trove of vaccine-related documents responsive to the request. If a federal judge in Texas agrees, plaintiffs Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency can expect to see the full record in 2076.

And during the normal R&D, testing, etc I’d agree with your point.

But this was in the midst of a global pandemic when death tolls were spiking at this point. There wasn’t the time to be as thorough as they normally are. If memory serves, I believe they said at the time the normal development timeline was 12-18 months in a best case scenario. They moved from beginning to initial deployment, in what? 10 months or so? That entails a lot of corners being cut.

I don’t like that they evidently tried to drag their feet here, when honestly, if they were honest and say that they rushed to production despite some concerns about side effects given the circumstances, I think that would be understandable.

 

[KFsdisciple]

And during the normal R&D, testing, etc I’d agree with your point.

But this was in the midst of a global pandemic when death tolls were spiking at this point. There wasn’t the time to be as thorough as they normally are. If memory serves, I believe they said at the time the normal development timeline was 12-18 months in a best case scenario. They moved from beginning to initial deployment, in what? 10 months or so? That entails a lot of corners being cut.

I don’t like that they evidently tried to drag their feet here, when honestly, if they were honest and say that they rushed to production despite some concerns about side effects given the circumstances, I think that would be understandable.

“That entails a lot of corners being cut.” - exactly why anyone who wasn’t 100% sure they wanted the vaccine wasn’t wrong.

I completely agree with your last point

 

[Doodads and Hoohah]

vax me harder daddy! As your on your third bout with Covid and 6'th booster... But it would have been sooooo much worse LOL. I got the china virus once, no vaccine and no regrets.

Look at me. Tough guy, no vaxie.

 

[sabula]

Oh what could have been... but Teflon Don strikes again.
They tried to get him on a phone call with Ukraine - IMPEACHED
They tried to get him with Russian Pee Tapes - PUTIN HOLDING FOR FURTHER BLACKMAIL USE
They tried to get him for banging a porn star - TRIED AND GUILTY W 500+ MILLION $ FINE
They tried to get him with J6 Fail. IMPEACHED. AND... DOJ REPORT JUST SAID GUILTY AND WOULD HAVE BEEN CONVICTED
They tried to shoot him - REPUBLICAN SHOOTER FAIL
They tried to shoot him againFail. NO SHOTS EVEN FIRED

FIFY. You're welcome. I'm surprised you missed those facts, you must be using his "alternative facts" .🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

[Doodads and Hoohah]

I can't understand how today's democrats liked Gabbard, Kennedy, Musk and Trump when they were democrats but now that the democratic party doesn't rep them they despise them because of an initial next to their name. They are the same people. Talk about a brainwashed society. I hate both parties and they are both evil but don't let a little letter fool you! The diehards will continue their rhetoric on whatever side they lean.

There was a post on this board about who extremist are... If you have never voted for someone from the other side then you are part of the problem.

We know you can't understand. That would take some critical thinking.