ADVERTISEMENT

Spot on analysis to the current state of things and why

Political commentator I follow had a pretty simple take on why Kamala lost



Here's a longer video from today's stream where he goes a little more in depth on some of the messaging they should have used in the campaign.

 
Any Dem would be unpopular. That's kinda the point. No matter what job they do, Rs will unanimously say they're the worst ever.
You are wrong. There are 4-5 Dem house candidates who were incumbents who bucked the party and said they didn’t support the far left but supported law and order, closing the border, etc and still won in areas that Trump won by 6 or more. Middle America is done with the far left and right. People want the border closed, safe neighborhoods, and less money going overseas. That isn’t partisan. People want common sense.
 
You are wrong. There are 4-5 Dem house candidates who were incumbents who bucked the party and said they didn’t support the far left but supported law and order, closing the border, etc and still won in areas that Trump won by 6 or more. Middle America is done with the far left and right. People want the border closed, safe neighborhoods, and less money going overseas. That isn’t partisan. People want common sense.
The far right would be trying to overthrow the constitution that is the leader of the GOP. Lol
 
Terrible article.


This writer, writes like his shit don’t stink. He is a Harvard person, essentially is out of touch with 99.9% of America and the world at large. But has a big brain and uses well timed rhetorical devices like, “to be sure” “you can count on that” .. cringe at full effect.
 
Kinda the point. Media temporarily ignores Trump to help him get in office knowing that they will have four years of clicks if he does win.

You are not wrong that the media treats Trump with kid gloves.

But that's not a good excuse, whoever was running the campaign should have has Kamala, Walz, Mayor Pete or whoever on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and for all the shit I give it even Fox News daily so they can make sure the focal points they wanted the media talking about were getting talked about.
 
Would they though? They have been in office much more often than the republicans over the years. That just changed over night and moving forward the republicans will dominate the White House? Sounds like dems won’t give up crying and making excuses why they lost.
That's not really true since 1972 the rs are up 8-6.
 
So much outrage 🤣

Dems get their asses handed to them and all they got is the same ole crap. Until they start admitting their policies suck and not what the American people want, they are going to continue losing elections.

Don’t wait too long or this shift in voting could become permanent.

When or where has what you described ever happened in human history?
 
I hope the Dems believe this tripe. That way they will keep misunderstanding the American Electorate and projecting their own irrational hate on others.

The Dems lost because they were tone deaf on the issues that matter to most Americans. Economy and Security, obeying the law, having a border, and being honest. And ending the woke BS that ruins everything it touches.
Good God they hired a rapist felon. So much for obeying the law. For chrissake Trump petitioned the Supreme Court to make him immune to the law.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheRealHerky
You are not wrong that the media treats Trump with kid gloves.

But that's not a good excuse, whoever was running the campaign should have has Kamala, Walz, Mayor Pete or whoever on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and for all the shit I give it even Fox News daily so they can make sure the focal points they wanted the media talking about were getting talked about.
It's actually a real good excuse. If one candidate is raping women and leading coups. But the media wants to talk about the other candidate changing positions on fracking then you have an environment tailor made to handicap the non rapist candidate.
 
It's actually a real good excuse. If one candidate is raping women and leading coups. But the media wants to talk about the other candidate changing positions on fracking then you have an environment tailor made to handicap the non rapist candidate.


I'm sorry but Trump has been the face of the Republican party for about 10 years now, the DNC should have come up with a strategy to combat how the media covers and doesn't cover him at this point. They should have realized that the media wasn't pushing back on Trump for them and they needed to do that themselves.

Because guess what if Kamala went out on stage at every rally and said "Donald Trump was found guily of sexual assault by a jury of his peers on May 9th 2024. He is not fit to represent our country and he should be locked up like the sexual predator he is" for a week the media is going to be forced to talk about it. And even if they do that "tone done the rhetoric" crap about Trump's convictions it's still going to reinforce to viewers that Trump has convictions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOHOX69
This is good. This is the best post-election analysis I’ve read, from Professor Christopher Robichaud, Senior Lecturer in Ethics and Public Policy, Harvard:
“I'll say this, and then I likely won't be saying much more on here for quite some time, to the relief of some, I'm sure. But my farewell warning is this.
Everyone in the days and weeks ahead will use this loss as an opportunity to seek validation for their own hobby horse complaint. Harris lost because she campaigned with Liz Cheney. Harris lost because she didn't embrace Gaza. Harris lost because she didn't choose Shapiro. Harris lost because she wasn't progressive enough (possibly my favorite one).
Take a good hard look at the map, my friends. Trump has won the popular vote. Trump ran the table. Explaining that with your hobby horse issue isn't going to cut it, tempting and consoling as it may be. The problem isn't the electoral college. The problem isn't that we didn't have a full primary. The problem isn't Harris. The problem isn't that Dems didn't have the right message. The problem isn't even inflation or the border.
The problem is so much worse than any of those things. Those are all technical problems, with straightforward expertise fixes. If only it were so! No, our problem is not technical. It's very much adaptive. A party that embraced the Big Lie, supported an insurrection, and has been selling conspiracy-addled madness for years was widely and enthusiastically embraced. Voter turnout was profound! People didn't sit this out.
Simply put, the problem--as some of you have rightly posted--is cultural. America, culturally, has completely abandoned a politics of decency and respect and has embraced instead a politics of resentment, revenge, false nostalgia, and bullying. And if you look at the demographics, you also won't be able to comfort yourself that it's just a white thing, or a working class thing, or an education thing. It's multi-class, multi-gender, multi-educational and multi-racial. That's what winning the popular vote means. That's what running the table amounts to.
A culture that has descended to this level of debasement is not easily fixed. In fact it may not ever be fixed. The timeline for changing something like this is decades--at best--not two-to-four year election cycles. You can extend that in this case, because with the GOP likely controlling all branches of federal government and the courts, they will ensure that mechanisms are in place to keep them in power long after their popularity has waned. You can count on that.
The GOP evolved into a party of rage, lies, and revenge--and it correctly diagnosed that there was and is a large appetite for that. That's what the country wants. At least, enough of the country wants it to ensure broad appeal and widespread electoral success. The old GOP will never return, and the Dems have nothing to say to American culture at the moment. Nothing. They've been speaking to a country that's gone, like dust in the wind.
And that's my final thought, which my posts last night alluded to. The America I knew and loved is gone. This new America--nah, I won't even bother. I will say that cultural change is less likely to occur in politics, or in the academy. You're not going to get people to see how vulgar they've become through a clever argument or a nice campaign speech, that's for sure.
This would be time for the arts, broadly understood, to step in. The arts can change hearts and minds. Too bad the arts have been systematically dismantled in education in this country, and on the other end, the tech industry's assault on the arts through AI is sure to hollow out any good-faith efforts that might emerge.
And for the rest of the world, America's rightward lurch is, I'm afraid, bad news for you too. I know you know this. Because it's not isolated, is it? It's just at the moment the most prominent example of a burgeoning trend. And this will embolden others in other countries, to be sure. We need not speculate what happens when countries become mired in lies, embrace resentment, and savor bullying. We know exactly what happens. Bloody conflict and global destabilization.
The first quarter of the 21st century will therefore in hindsight be viewed as the seed-planting stage for the absolute shit show that's about to unfold globally over the next two and a half decades. Count on it.
Adopt whatever coping and endurance strategies you have available. You're going to need it.
I think that's all I've left to say.”
There are some good points but Harris lost because she was considered an incumbent who had to bring a country back from global inflation. Harris like the majority of incumbents worldwide, have been losing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NoWokeBloke
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT