ADVERTISEMENT

Start building your bunkers people. “Serious national threat”

My brother, who is not NSA, says millions and at least 90% are carrying a big load of fentanyl. Most have been released from prisons and insane asylums to come here. And every single one is allowed to vote Dem now effective immediately. Only country in the world dumb enough to allow this to destroy themselves, he says.
Joe Biden strikes again.

And to think you have people on this board clamoring to vote him back in for another 4 years of destroying America 1 day at a time.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: HIWILLE and h-hawk
Our 53 fast attack submarines carry 54% of our nuclear arsenal and their replacements are going to carry even more...
That's all well and fine, but what good will they be against this new existential Russian threat?
Austin Powers Shark GIF by reactionseditor
 
So this seems much ado about nothing. Russia and the US have had this capability for years but have simpler and safer means to achieve the same goals than using nukes. Both sides have had the capability to knock down satellites with killer satellites plus the US has modified air to air missiles which can go into space and take out Orcmobiles.


"On September 13, 1985, at 12:42 p.m., Major Wilbert “Doug” Pearson pushed the “pickle button” in the cockpit of his F-15A, launching a missile high over the Pacific Ocean. He was in a steep vertical climb, flying at just under Mach 1, and was at 36,000 feet. The missile roared toward its target, the Solwind P78-1 satellite moving at 17,500 mph, almost 300 miles above Pearson’s aircraft. As the missile disappeared from view, all Pearson could do was wait—he wouldn’t be able to see if it had hit the target. But his friend Scott in the control room would know. They worked out a code so Pearson could find out when he radioed Scott after the launch."

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/first-space-ace-180968349/
 
So this seems much ado about nothing. Russia and the US have had this capability for years but have simpler and safer means to achieve the same goals than using nukes. Both sides have had the capability to knock down satellites with killer satellites plus the US has modified air to air missiles which can go into space and take out Orcmobiles.


"On September 13, 1985, at 12:42 p.m., Major Wilbert “Doug” Pearson pushed the “pickle button” in the cockpit of his F-15A, launching a missile high over the Pacific Ocean. He was in a steep vertical climb, flying at just under Mach 1, and was at 36,000 feet. The missile roared toward its target, the Solwind P78-1 satellite moving at 17,500 mph, almost 300 miles above Pearson’s aircraft. As the missile disappeared from view, all Pearson could do was wait—he wouldn’t be able to see if it had hit the target. But his friend Scott in the control room would know. They worked out a code so Pearson could find out when he radioed Scott after the launch."

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/first-space-ace-180968349/
Accidents with Nukes has brought us closer to death than any intentional war acts.
 
The real problem is that we have turned our military into more and more of a highly complex weave of cheap drones mixed with geosynchronous satellites for positioning and intel. The Army just cancelled the latest planned small strike helicopter designed to replace some roles of Kiowas and Apaches this week in favor of just more small drones relying on geosat data. And the current Air Force plan of replacing F-22s with a slow F-35 hub that uses an attached swarm of drones and a couple of behind the lines new F-15EX acting as missile trucks hopefully out of the way of more nimble Russian and Chinese sixth gen fighters means that if you know out our geosat capability our Air Force assets are essentially useless. Just some completely useless drones that cant even Fly without the geo sats let alone fight, some 60 year old designed planes that have no stealth and are sitting ducks and a small amount of F-35s which are not designed for equal air to air furballs with equivalent or better dogfighters. The F-35 is designed to hit the opponent when THEY are blind and don’t know what hits them, when the tables are turned because of overreliance on geo sats they are screwed.

So it’s really that our defensive strategy relies on the Air Force establishing dominance in space through exact knowledge of the enemy location. Once that’s taken away from us, our uncrewed and remote crewed are useless and our smart bombs become dumb bombs. We could use assets like the super slow E-2 and E-3s but the Russians and Chinese have developed long range hypersonic missiles to blow those super slow and lumbering jets out of the air From beyond where our current fighters can kill the launching fighters. So that leaves the need for a replacement for the SR-71 that can go ultrafast, ultrahigh and have the coordinating capabilities of an E-2 or E-3. Although we might have been testing the Auroras/SR-72s we will need a lot more. Or even better replacements. Otherwise our entire plan to deal with Russia and China is useless and our entire military is as outdated as Polish horse lancers charging German tanks in WW2.

FUNFACT: In the 1970s/80s, when the risks of EMP came to light, the American military had been bagging on the 'ancient' electronics in the current-gen MIG fighters. Until they realized those older electronics were MUCH more immune to an EMP pulse, and nearly every American plane used micro-electronics/microcircuits that would all be fried by the same EMP pulses.

No idea if our current fighter infrastructure is now 'hardened' from the same threat or not. Because there was a treaty to ban nukes in space, they very well may still be vulnerable....
 
FUNFACT: In the 1970s/80s, when the risks of EMP came to light, the American military had been bagging on the 'ancient' electronics in the current-gen MIG fighters. Until they realized those older electronics were MUCH more immune to an EMP pulse, and nearly every American plane used micro-electronics/microcircuits that would all be fried by the same EMP pulses.

No idea if our current fighter infrastructure is now 'hardened' from the same threat or not. Because there was a treaty to ban nukes in space, they very well may still be vulnerable....
My guess is our fighters are hardened from EMP pulses but the planes we send to other countries....well, I guess it depends if they picked up the Deluxe EMP hardening kit to go with the upgraded stereo and head's up display.
 
FWIW

Me: [texted an image of the tweet] followed by, "Dude, should I gas up the Jeep and head for the hills?"

NSA Friend: "Seriously. It's getting bad."

Me: "Wait. What? Do you mean National Security Threat or Politicians being dumb?"

NSA Friend: "As you know, I don't use Twitter or SM (you know why). All I can say is it's not the first time people have sounded alarms recently. Millions of military-age males from countries including China have been coming into our country the past 2-3 years. ...not all of them are just looking for better opportunities. Not at work today, but not sure what I could comment on with what you sent anyway. Hope you're well."
So just curious, did you gas up the jeep and head for the hills?

This is how I imagine alaskan and Whiskey biding their time when the sh*t hits the fan...

 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
So just curious, did you gas up the jeep and head for the hills?

This is how I imagine alaskan and Whiskey biding their time when the sh*t hits the fan...

LOL No. I was being funny. I failed in my attempt at humor. It happens.


I did text my former XO at NSA-T. He's in the Navy and still there. I also reached out to one of our LNO's at the 16AF. No one at the Command Staff had heard about that tweet at the time.

Again, it's not like I was expecting any details...I'm read out and no longer posses the required need-to-know. I was more hoping for the good ole 👎or 👍-type confirmation. Even that is probably wishful thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noleclone2
We aren't "sending money"

We're "sending weapons", idiot. MOST of the money is going to US weapons manufacturers.
we're actually doing both, but to your point the real 'sending money' comes later. and have no doubt we'll be sending lots.
 
LOL No. I was being funny. I failed in my attempt at humor. It happens.


I did text my former XO at NSA-T. He's in the Navy and still there. I also reached out to one of our LNO's at the 16AF. No one at the Command Staff had heard about that tweet at the time.

Again, it's not like I was expecting any details...I'm read out and no longer posses the required need-to-know. I was more hoping for the good ole 👎or 👍-type confirmation. Even that is probably wishful thinking.
this was one of my favorite little subconversations in this thread, because I read it quite literally as I was pushing my son's 1954 USA Willys into our garage as part of getting ready to sell the house. Ain't nuthin in that vehicle that needs to be "hardened" against EMPs
 
this was one of my favorite little subconversations in this thread, because I read it quite literally as I was pushing my son's 1954 USA Willys into our garage as part of getting ready to sell the house. Ain't nuthin in that vehicle that needs to be "hardened" against EMPs
OOoo, can have a thread on this please? Here's my 1951 Willys M38 (from the Korean War). It still has the original flat-head 4 with the 24-volt battery system. ...I've blown a few trailer lights in my time. :)

One1T4o.jpg
 
this was one of my favorite little subconversations in this thread, because I read it quite literally as I was pushing my son's 1954 USA Willys into our garage as part of getting ready to sell the house. Ain't nuthin in that vehicle that needs to be "hardened" against EMPs
This is generally true.

Vehicles w/o any onboard computers will be fine.
99% of what Americans drive will need a new onboard control unit...
 
OOoo, can have a thread on this please? Here's my 1951 Willys M38 (from the Korean War). It still has the original flat-head 4 with the 24-volt battery system. ...I've blown a few trailer lights in my time. :)

One1T4o.jpg
That is pristine (though I'm not sure how i feel about the new tires). Let me see if I can link a pic to Jr.'s vehicle. Given that we are in Arlington, and car theft happens, and this doesn't actually have an 'ignition key,' he keeps his batteries in his bedroom.. :)Let me see if I can post a link.
 
Link to a couple of pics of AardvarkJr's:


(I did not post the somewhat hilarious pic where my wife and i were out to a new years eve dinner, and she was dressed up all fancy but forgot her shawl, which he delivered to her in the jeep. It was quite incongruous and jarring as an image to see here standing next to this thing in a sparkly dress.)
 
Last edited:
Link to a couple of pics of AardvarkJr's:


(I did not post the somewhat hilarious pic where my wife and i were out to a new years eve dinner, and she was dressed up all fancy but forgot her shawl, which he delivered to her in the jeep. It was quite incongruous and jarring as an image.)
Love me some old military vehicles. Anything from WW2 to Korea is really cool.
 
Indeed. And we're already seizing Russian assets to pay for much of it.
And should continue to do so.
Russian assets aren't going to come close to paying for our non-military aid. Take a look at the interesting lecture i posted into the russia thread, btw, for some of the lessons learned that they're going to try to implement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tumorboy
Love me some old military vehicles. Anything from WW2 to Korea is really cool.
My late brother used to drive this in my hometown military parade. We have the ginormous radio antenna for it, as well as the doors. He bequeathed it to my son in his will, and Jr. loves to play with it. When he first got it, we took it to our local "cars and coffee" and he got a lot of visitors, but the coolest thing when two guys came up with their own and invited him into their 'group'. My brother also had a Mt. Prospect Police Bluesmobile, complete with SCMODS, but he sold that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tumorboy
Russian assets aren't going to come close to paying for our non-military aid. Take a look at the interesting lecture i posted into the russia thread, btw, for some of the lessons learned that they're going to try to implement.
The real outlay is post war. How much Western investment is going to be needed to make sure we have a Japan result and not Korea result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aardvark86
My late brother used to drive this in my hometown military parade. We have the ginormous radio antenna for it, as well as the doors. He bequeathed it to my son in his will, and Jr. loves to play with it. My brother also had a Mt. Prospect Police Bluesmobile, complete with SCMODS, but he sold that one.
The new oldsmobiles are in early this year.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Aardvark86
That is pristine (though I'm not sure how i feel about the new tires). Let me see if I can link a pic to Jr.'s vehicle. Given that we are in Arlington, and car theft happens, and this doesn't actually have an 'ignition key,' he keeps his batteries in his bedroom.. :)Let me see if I can post a link.
I'd say it's about 90% original and the 10% has been due to requirements.

A. Not the original front bumper because it gets towed a lot and we used to use it for pulling trees out of our back 40 for firewood. (the rear is now OEM and not what is shown in the pic).
B. Tires. For when my dad had to drive it daily for work and we preferred those ATs for hunting in the Ocala National Forest.

This is the Jeep I learned to drive on when I was 10 an has been in the family for 40 years.
 
I'd say it's about 90% original and the 10% has been due to requirements.

A. Not the original front bumper because it gets towed a lot and we used to use it for pulling trees out of our back 40 for firewood. (the rear is now OEM and not what is shown in the pic).
B. Tires. For when my dad had to drive it daily for work and we preferred those ATs for hunting in the Ocala National Forest.

This is the Jeep I learned to drive on when I was 10 an has been in the family for 40 years.
Maybe u covered this above. How did your family acquire it?
 
Maybe u covered this above. How did your family acquire it?
Believe it or not, the good old fashioned auto-trader (newspaper version). The gentlemen we bought it from got it from some military surplus place that literally got it off the return boat from Korea. He patched the bullet holes himself. So the ownership went.

- U.S. Army
- Orlando Man
- My family
 
Believe it or not, the good old fashioned auto-trader (newspaper version). The gentlemen we bought it from got it from some military surplus place that literally got it off the return boat from Korea. He patched the bullet holes himself. So the ownership went.

- U.S. Army
- Orlando Man
- My family
Should’ve left the bullet holes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
Should’ve left the bullet holes.
Gone when we got it.

Over the last 40 years we've rebuilt the engine the transmission and my dad and I have painted every single bolt, engine, part, piece, etc. the original military olive drab. The only thing that's not is the primary body which is called desert tan.
 
That is pristine (though I'm not sure how i feel about the new tires). Let me see if I can link a pic to Jr.'s vehicle. Given that we are in Arlington, and car theft happens, and this doesn't actually have an 'ignition key,' he keeps his batteries in his bedroom.. :)Let me see if I can post a link.

Consider telling him to get a remote-controlled key-fob battery lockout switch for it (which, of course, would get blitzed by EMP, but in the meantime makes your vehicle appear DOA to anyone trying to start it).

But, if they can access under the hood, it takes 5 min to remove those and re-attach a battery cable....

If those things still have a fuse-box, instead of pulling the battery out, just take out the fuse that goes with one of the key operational features, like the starter, etc. A lot faster to pop that back in, and you could probably get some aftermarket remote switch for that which no one would even be able to identify/see.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT