ADVERTISEMENT

State to pay former University of Iowa director $325K to settle discrimination lawsuit

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,625
59,196
113
The State of Iowa has agreed to pay the former director of a University of Iowa program for students with disabilities $325,000 to settle her lawsuit accusing the institution and Board of Regents of age and gender discrimination and of violating her civil rights for equal pay.


About $127,666 of the settlement total will cover non-wage damages for Pam Ries, who began her UI tenure as an assistant clinical professor in 2000 and was promoted in 2013 to director of UI REACH — a program that helps students with intellectual, cognitive, and learning disabilities transition to college.


Another $50,000 will cover Ries’ claim for lost wages, and the remaining $147,333 will cover court costs and attorney fees.


That’s the third Board of Regents personnel-related settlement this budget year, bringing the payout tally to $635,000. In the last budget year — which ended June 30, 2021 — the State Appeal Board approved more than $6.8 million in settlements and judgments.


Nearly half of that involved UI Health Care settlements, which topped $3.07 million, while UI paid $350,000; University of Northern Iowa paid just under $2 million; and Iowa State University paid $713,500 during the 2021 budget year.


The new Ries settlement does not amount to an admission of guilt.


And the university directory shows Ries remains a clinical professor, earning $84,250.


In her lawsuit, she accuses College of Education Dean Daniel Clay — hired July 1, 2016 — of avoiding the then-61-year-old Ries and failing to engage with her about UI REACH, instead communicating and collaborating with her younger subordinate.


A year after Clay’s hire — despite years of positive performance reviews — Clay called Ries into a meeting, told her he’d observed problems within UI REACH, and removed her as director, according to her lawsuit.


Clay refused to provide specifics on the “problems,” according to Ries, and without “performance management” — per UI policy and practice — fired her as UI REACH director, demoting her to a teaching post making $100,000 less in wages and benefits.


When the university opened up the search for a new director in fall 2017, Ries applied — while also filing a civil rights complaint against Clay and UI. The university didn’t pick her and instead closed the search in February 2018, according to the lawsuit.


That spring, UI used an outside firm to reopen the search, and Ries again applied.


The university hired a younger male in August 2018 at a starting wage of $160,000. Today, Director Bill Loyd Jr. is making $168,100. Ries’ last salary as UI REACH director was $135,267.


Ries did not respond to The Gazette’s email requesting comment.


UI officials did not immediately provide a comment.


Attorneys for the university and regents had asked the court to dismiss Ries’ claims, which a district judge denied in November.


“The court concludes that defendants have not met their burden and there are genuine issues of material fact such that defendants are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law,” 5th Judicial District Judge Lawrence McLellan wrote.

 
I wish I was working at the UI General counsel's office. It's run by complete morons. I do know the Hospital General Counsel. He finished middle of the pack in my law school class but his pops was/is an oncologist there so kid got the job. Nepotism pays in this town :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I wish I was working at the UI General counsel's office. It's run by complete morons. I do know the Hospital General Counsel. He finished middle of the pack in my law school class but his pops was/is an oncologist there so kid got the job. Nepotism pays in this town :)
“That’s a bunch of bullshit GOHOX69!”

1045225134.jpg.0.jpg
 
Clay was one of the four finalists to be president. I don’t have much of an idea on the merits of the firing, or if Ries was actually any good at her job. Good reviews don’t always mean that. Sometimes they mean low expectations and chummy reviewers. But, if you are going to fire someone have a bullet in the chamber.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT