Tariffs
- Thread starter RNHawk
- Start date
So you want the right to refuse care to people who participate in activities you don't approve of?
**** no! Let 'em die!! Stop all vaccines. Kill Medicaid. Kill the CDC. Kill HHS and NIH. Let everybody die!
If you want to go to the extreme of legalizing drugs then we should consider the extreme on the opposite side
Our emergency rooms will continue to treat emergencies, regardless of cause.
As far as fentanyl addiction, I'm not familiar with a comprehensive treatment that society provides on a national scale, currently
What about drunks? speeders? jaywalkers? smokers? thrill seekers? gun nuts? etc. Can we just refuse medical care for them too.
Over 80% of the fentanyl is being brought across by Americans. Maybe stop Americans from bringing drugs into the country could be a starting point.
It's BEYOND a stretch to tie tariffs to fentenyl and expect sane citizens to buy that argument.
I wonder who actually writes these Trump social media posts????
Steven Miller, is my guess.
This will fail like most things Trump tries.
What a cluster$&#@.
I wonder who actually writes these Trump social media posts????
Steven Miller, is my guess.
This will fail like most things Trump tries.
What a cluster$&#@.
What if Trump wins? The Heritage Foundation wins? At what point do the fires stop if democracy dies?
Harm mitigation with safe use can be effective but you have to have MAT programs which are easily assessable. A lot of safe use programs haven't addressed that gap.
You don’t think we are? It’s a big border, help is always appreciated from those in the other side of the border
I don't see the difference between drug users and others that make poor decisions. Why wouldn't they deserve treatment as well?
I don't like watching this country being destroyed by an incompetent, vindictive prick.
Next question?
Why would that be a stipulation? Of course we’d treat them.
We could have wasted a lot less time if you would have posed this here question before you started this thread.
Guns are legal. Should we stop treating gunshot wounds? You see how stupid this sounds?
Do you understand the threats of tariffs curtail corporate spending in research and development, hiring, mergers and acquisition, and pretty much ALL business decisions?
No one likes dealing with the unknown.
Certainly not Big Business.
Trying to play "ignorant" is a bad look.
Be better.
When it comes to treating somebody in an emergency situation it absolutely is. Stop.
The cartel wars ravaging Mexico are being fought primarily with guns, which are illegal in Mexico, purchased in the United States. Would you be ok with Mexico, or another country, enacting tariffs until the United States implemented policies to restrict gun movement?
Honestly, Yes, that sounds great. "Mexico, we will stop the flow of guns entering your country, in return, we want you to secure your side of the border from illegals and drugs.
I like that much better than tariffs. And if Mexico doesn't uphold their end of the deal... then let's talk about tariffs or other measures. But if Mexico wants to do tariffs on our exports as long as we have equal tariffs on imports then fine.
So we just legalized all drugs, 2 911 calls come in there is only one ambulance, one is for a 49 year old overdose and the other is for a 32 year old with anaphylaxis. Who gets the paramedic?
You can get 911 calls at the same time, great question, really puts us in a really bad situation with the legalization of drugs
Aren't most first responders trained to handle most emergencies? Let's say there's only one ambulance available, couldn't they send a fire truck or policeman at the very least they could take one of them to the hospital?
Similar threads
