There was a bad no-call PI that helped MSU. There were bad calls that helped MSU in that game too.
One of the worst calls of the year.
It wasn't just the blown illegal touching call that cost MSU this game. MSU gave up 500 yards of offense & 33 points before that play. If MSU doesn't play itself into a shoot-out, then this wouldn't have happened.
In football - there is no such thing as losing on a single play. If you're in that position in the first place - more than a single play got you there.Not all bad calls are the same....time and score make a big difference.
Could you imagine if this were us? I'm completely upalled by this referee call. MSU got jobbed and calls of this magnitude deserve to be a) called right and b) rectified when blatantly observed in review.
The booth officials couldn't review if he was forced out or not, they couldn't overturn it even if they wanted to. The announcers even said the same thing.
Hold up: did we see ANY shot of when the Nebraska receiver FIRST stepped out? I haven't seen one yet. If not, who is to say that he wasn't forced out by the corner? Anyway, this is good for us as members of the B1G West AND for our mentality going into Lincoln. As for Sparty, you live by the fluke (Michigan) you die by the fluke (Nebraska).
Hold up: did we see ANY shot of when the Nebraska receiver FIRST stepped out? I haven't seen one yet. If not, who is to say that he wasn't forced out by the corner? Anyway, this is good for us as members of the B1G West AND for our mentality going into Lincoln. As for Sparty, you live by the fluke (Michigan) you die by the fluke (Nebraska).
In the college game if the WR (or anyone else) is thought to be 'forced out' they can come in bounds and be first to touch ball. They just have to reestablish themselves in the field of play. I would hope the NCAA goes to the NFL rule where there are no force outs and the person who steps out cannot be first to touch...MSU won one they shouldn't have and they've now lost one they shouldn't have.
Ref blew it, plain and simple. If he thought the defender forced the receiver out, it should have been a penalty for illegal contact.
then we have to determine what "forced out" means. Is the simple fact that the defender cut the receiver off so he had to go out of bounds to get around him "forced out"? Or does there have to be contact? The replays showed he went out of bounds prior to ANY contact-- there was some contact as he was out of bounds.In the college game if the WR (or anyone else) is thought to be 'forced out' they can come in bounds and be first to touch ball. They just have to reestablish themselves in the field of play. I would hope the NCAA goes to the NFL rule where there are no force outs and the person who steps out cannot be first to touch...
That wasn't my point. My point was if there was a force out, it would have happened greater than five yards from the line of scrimmage (because if it was within five, the Nebraska receiver ran 30 yards out of bounds and that's a penalty), and thus would have been illegal contact downfield. That flag wasn't thrown so the ref either didn't see it or he didn't think it happened. Either way, he should not have granted the catch.In the college game if the WR (or anyone else) is thought to be 'forced out' they can come in bounds and be first to touch ball. They just have to reestablish themselves in the field of play. I would hope the NCAA goes to the NFL rule where there are no force outs and the person who steps out cannot be first to touch...
Just for clarification, there is no 5-yard illegal contact rule in college football. The defender can make continuous contact (not holding) with eligible receivers at any point on the field until the ball is in the air.That wasn't my point. My point was if there was a force out, it would have happened greater than five yards from the line of scrimmage (because if it was within five, the Nebraska receiver ran 30 yards out of bounds and that's a penalty), and thus would have been illegal contact downfield. That flag wasn't thrown so the ref either didn't see it or he didn't think it happened. Either way, he should not have granted the catch.
Not all bad calls are the same....time and score make a big difference.
That may be true, but why would they have reviewed it?Apparently if there is ANY contact whatsoever...even if there was no force out...the play is not reviewable.
Beats me!That may be true, but why would they have reviewed it?
It was the correct call. The call on the field stood because contact was made making it unreviewable.
Funny, only Nebraska fans think it was the correct call. FYI, unreviewable doesn't equal correct. Also, the clowns on the field took forever to confirm the TD even before the review so they probably thought it would be reviewed anyway.