Or could just be doing a stand up morally correct thing. We could have DeSantis for prez this cycle but boomers want their rematch.
![Ghosts Reaction GIF by CBS Ghosts Reaction GIF by CBS](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia3.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FF3QjxSH0LY6DE6iDEh%2F200.gif&hash=c4ab9fe12787b43b4cfea1cd405d2014)
Or could just be doing a stand up morally correct thing. We could have DeSantis for prez this cycle but boomers want their rematch.
Jimmy Kimmel is scum, always has been scum.
Desantis in neither stand up nor moral.Or could just be doing a stand up morally correct thing.
Thank God we won't.We could have DeSantis for prez this cycle
Called it.DeSantis taking revenge on Trump?
When was Trump convicted of being a sexual abuser? I know he's been found liable in a civil action, but wasn't aware he'd been convicted of anything.Imagine that, a convicted sexual abuser now being found out that he likes little kids. I'm sure the religious right will love Lying Donnie Sexual Abuser more for this, won't they? Jimmy Swaggart and Jerry Baker say, right on my man! You go!
Holy crap man. Step back and look at what you are defending. Take stock of what you are trying to do and associating your "name" with.When was Trump convicted of being a sexual abuser? I know he's been found liable in a civil action, but wasn't aware he'd been convicted of anything.
Your only defense of your sex abuser is semantics? 😂 You must be very proud...When was Trump convicted of being a sexual abuser? I know he's been found liable in a civil action, but wasn't aware he'd been convicted of anything.
Can't wait to vote for a rapist. You're gross.When was Trump convicted of being a sexual abuser? I know he's been found liable in a civil action, but wasn't aware he'd been convicted of anything.
There's certain times when arguing semantics is necessary or is a good move.When was Trump convicted of being a sexual abuser? I know he's been found liable in a civil action, but wasn't aware he'd been convicted of anything.
Technically speaking, Trump hasn't been convicted or fined. His cases were civil, not criminal.
So you admit you lied when you said he's been convicted and fined. There's a huge legal difference between that and civil matters. You lie, but call out Trump for lying.
Hmmm…When was Trump convicted of being a sexual abuser? I know he's been found liable in a civil action, but wasn't aware he'd been convicted of anything.
He doesn't like Trump but he reeeeeally likes defending him when people use the wrong verbiage when discussing a jury of Trump's peers deciding that he did in fact sexually abuse someone.Hmmm…
Don't hold your breath Bro, she hasn't got 1 centavo yet.Party at E Jean's house tonight!! Lying Donnie Sexual Abuser is buying... to the tune of about $89,000,000.
She'll be swimming in HIS $89,000,000 cash. Its already left his hands and is just waiting... Woo hoo!! 🤑🤑 Thanks for ponying up Donnie! Love me some accountability! Rack up the debt!Don't hold your breath Bro, she hasn't got 1 centavo yet.
Nope, Bro that dried up prune won't see a penny.She'll be swimming in HIS $89,000,000 cash. Its already left his hands and is just waiting... Woo hoo!! 🤑🤑 Thanks for ponying up Donnie! Love me some accountability! Rack up the debt!
Didn't she already receive the $5 million or whatever it was from the original case?Nope, Bro that dried up prune won't see a penny.
Lock him up... after a fair trial of course.
I like how @Finance85 abandoned this thread.Hmmm…
More to come?
This has been in the works for a while... authorized by RDS
This has been in the works for a while... authorized by RDS
That short awkward guy with the stupid looking boots.Who is RDS?
You realize it's not just semantics, right? One is an actual crime that requires unanimous proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The other is a civil action that only requires the preponderance of evidence.There's certain times when arguing semantics is necessary or is a good move.
When it comes to Trump, and him being found liable of sexual abuse by a jury of his peers...not one of those times.
This is why some folks make fun of others on here. Folks say they hate or dislike Trump but will argue shit about him or defend him when there's absolutely no reason to.
You realize it's not just semantics, right? One is an actual crime that requires unanimous proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The other is a civil action that only requires the preponderance of evidence.
That short awkward guy with the stupid looking boots.
So cute how you defend a man that's on Epstein's list. You're such a cute good little keyboard warrior.You realize it's not just semantics, right? One is an actual crime that requires unanimous proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The other is a civil action that only requires the preponderance of evidence.
So cute how you defend a man that's on Epstein's list. You're such a cute good little keyboard warrior.
He probably won't.And he still never answered my question about the Stormy case.
I didn't defend anyone. I simply told the truth, which was being distorted. Did I say that losing a multi-million-dollar civil suit was a good thing?So cute how you defend a man that's on Epstein's list. You're such a cute good little keyboard warrior.
You're one of the posters constantly defending Trump in every thread. You are his special little man. Keep up the good work, sportI didn't defend anyone. I simply told the truth, which was being distorted. Did I say that losing a multi-million-dollar civil suit was a good thing?