ADVERTISEMENT

The G.O.P. Bumper Sticker: Trump First. Putin Second. America Third.

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,934
113
Every so often there is a piece of legislation on Capitol Hill that defines America and its values — that shows what kind of country we want to be. I would argue that when it comes to the $118.3 billion bipartisan compromise bill in the Senate to repair our broken immigration system and supply vital aid to Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel, its passage or failure won’t define just America but also the world that we’re going to inhabit.
There are hinges in history, and this is one of them. What Washington does — or does not do — this year to support its allies and secure our border will say so much about our approach to security and stability in this new post-post-Cold War era. Will America carry the red, white and blue flag into the future — or just a white flag? Given the pessimistic talk coming out of the Capitol, it is looking more and more like the white flag — autographed by Donald Trump.
Barring some last-minute surprise that saves the compromise bill, a terrible thing is about to happen — thanks largely to a Republican Party that has lost its way as it falls in lock step behind a man whose philosophy is not “America First” but “Donald Trump First.” “Trump First” means that a bill that would strengthen America and its allies must be set aside so that America can continue to boil in polarization, Vladimir Putin can triumph in Ukraine and our southern border can remain an open sore — until and unless Trump becomes president once more. Our allies be damned. Our enemies be emboldened. Our children’s future security be mortgaged.
Today’s G.O.P. bumper sticker: Trump First. Putin Second. America Third.
“The United States has for some time ceased to be a serious country. Our extreme polarization combined with institutional rules that privilege minorities makes it impossible for us to meet our international obligations,” the political theorist Francis Fukuyama remarked on the American Purpose website. “The Republican Party has grown very adept at hostage holding. … The hard-core MAGA wing represents a minority within a minority, yet our institutional rules permit them to veto decisions clearly favored by a majority of Americans.”
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Alas, though, while the current dysfunction of the Republican Party can explain why this particular legislation is likely to fail, how we came to this awful moment is a longer, deeper story.
This emerging post-post-Cold War era is a real throwback to the kind of dangerous, traditional great-power competition prevalent in the Cold War and World War II and most of history before that. Unfortunately, we have arrived at this moment with too many elected officials — especially in the senior ranks of the Republican Party — who never experienced such a world, and with a defense industrial base woefully unprepared for this world. Believe it or not, President Biden’s national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, has had to spend hours of valuable time each month searching the world for 155-milimeter shells for the Ukrainian Army because we don’t have enough.
That’s crazy. And it is particularly crazy at a time when three revisionist powers — Russia, China and Iran — are each simultaneously probing every day to see if they can push back America and its allies along three different frontiers — Europe, the South China Sea and the Middle East. They probe, individually and through proxies, to see how we react — if we react — and then probe some more. In Putin’s case, when the time seemed right, he launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

“Because of generational change, most of America’s political elite today grew up in the relatively benign, pax-Americana post-Cold War era — 1989 to 2022” (when Putin invaded Ukraine) “and they have lost the habit and the knack of thinking about global politics in military terms,” the U.S. foreign policy historian Michael Mandelbaum told me. “Very few members of the elite today have served in the military.”
This is “very different from the Cold War era, when most of our policymaking elite were people who experienced World War II,” added Mandelbaum, author of the forthcoming book “The Titans of the Twentieth Century: How They Made History and the History They Made.” “Now, after 30 years of the post-Cold War era, Joe Biden is one of the few remaining leaders who was a policymaker during the Cold War — and issues of grand strategy and the management of great-power competition are no longer a major part of our public discourse.”


Trump, like Biden, grew up in the Cold War, but he spent a lot of it contemplating his wealth rather than contemplating the world. Trump’s instincts, Mandelbaum noted, are really a throwback to the interwar period between World War I and World War II, when a whole segment of the elite felt World War I was a failure and a mistake — the equivalent today of Iraq and Afghanistan — and then approached the dawn of World War II as isolationists and protectionists, seeing our allies as either hopeless or leeches.
As for Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson, I wonder how often he uses his passport. I wonder if he has a passport. He is one of the most powerful people in America, following in the footsteps of both Republican and Democratic speakers who advanced our interests and made us strong in the world for decades. So far, he seems to care only about serving Trump’s interests, even if that means playing extremely risky games with foreign policy.
Meanwhile, many on the left emerged from this post-Cold War era with the view that the biggest problem in the world is not too little American power but too much — the lessons they drew from Iraq and Afghanistan.
And so, who will tell the people? Who will tell the people that America is the tent pole that holds up the world? If we let that pole disintegrate, your kids won’t grow up in just a different America; they’ll grow up in a different world, and a much worse one.
After Ukraine inflicted a terrible defeat on the Russian Army — thanks to U.S. and NATO funding and weapons — without costing a single American soldier’s life, Putin now has to be licking his chops at the thought that we will walk away from Ukraine, leaving him surely counting the days until Kyiv’s missile stocks run out and he will own the skies. Then it’s bombs away.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


As Financial Times columnist Gideon Rachman just reported, “the ammunition shortage” in Ukraine “has already led to an increase in Ukrainian casualties. … The shortage of weaponry is also having an effect on the willingness of Ukrainians to volunteer for military service. The mounting pressure on the Kyiv government is part of the explanation for the public falling-out between President Volodymyr Zelensky and his commander in chief, Valeriy Zaluzhny.”
If this is the future, and our friends from Europe to the Middle East to Asia sense that we are going into hibernation, they will all start to cut deals — European allies with Putin, Arab allies with Iran, Asian allies with China. We won’t feel the change overnight, but, unless we pass this bill or something close to it, we will feel it over time.
America’s ability to assemble alliances against the probes of Russia, China and Iran will gradually be diminished. Our ability to sustain sanctions on “pariah nations” like North Korea will erode. The rules governing trade, banking and the sanctity of borders being violated by force — rules that America set, enforced and benefited from since World War II — will increasingly be set by others, and by their interests.
Yes, America still has considerable power, but that power led to influence because allies and enemies knew we were ready to use it to defend ourselves and help our friends defend themselves and our shared values. All of that will now be in doubt if this bill goes down for good.

Remember this week, folks — because historians surely will.




own for good.
Remember this week, folks — because historians surely will.
 
JFC, do people stay up all night thinking of this stuff. People are wasting their skills, instead they should be writing Hollywood scripts.
 
Every so often there is a piece of legislation on Capitol Hill that defines America and its values — that shows what kind of country we want to be. I would argue that when it comes to the $118.3 billion bipartisan compromise bill in the Senate to repair our broken immigration system and supply vital aid to Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel, its passage or failure won’t define just America but also the world that we’re going to inhabit.
There are hinges in history, and this is one of them. What Washington does — or does not do — this year to support its allies and secure our border will say so much about our approach to security and stability in this new post-post-Cold War era. Will America carry the red, white and blue flag into the future — or just a white flag? Given the pessimistic talk coming out of the Capitol, it is looking more and more like the white flag — autographed by Donald Trump.
Barring some last-minute surprise that saves the compromise bill, a terrible thing is about to happen — thanks largely to a Republican Party that has lost its way as it falls in lock step behind a man whose philosophy is not “America First” but “Donald Trump First.” “Trump First” means that a bill that would strengthen America and its allies must be set aside so that America can continue to boil in polarization, Vladimir Putin can triumph in Ukraine and our southern border can remain an open sore — until and unless Trump becomes president once more. Our allies be damned. Our enemies be emboldened. Our children’s future security be mortgaged.
Today’s G.O.P. bumper sticker: Trump First. Putin Second. America Third.
“The United States has for some time ceased to be a serious country. Our extreme polarization combined with institutional rules that privilege minorities makes it impossible for us to meet our international obligations,” the political theorist Francis Fukuyama remarked on the American Purpose website. “The Republican Party has grown very adept at hostage holding. … The hard-core MAGA wing represents a minority within a minority, yet our institutional rules permit them to veto decisions clearly favored by a majority of Americans.”
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Alas, though, while the current dysfunction of the Republican Party can explain why this particular legislation is likely to fail, how we came to this awful moment is a longer, deeper story.
This emerging post-post-Cold War era is a real throwback to the kind of dangerous, traditional great-power competition prevalent in the Cold War and World War II and most of history before that. Unfortunately, we have arrived at this moment with too many elected officials — especially in the senior ranks of the Republican Party — who never experienced such a world, and with a defense industrial base woefully unprepared for this world. Believe it or not, President Biden’s national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, has had to spend hours of valuable time each month searching the world for 155-milimeter shells for the Ukrainian Army because we don’t have enough.
That’s crazy. And it is particularly crazy at a time when three revisionist powers — Russia, China and Iran — are each simultaneously probing every day to see if they can push back America and its allies along three different frontiers — Europe, the South China Sea and the Middle East. They probe, individually and through proxies, to see how we react — if we react — and then probe some more. In Putin’s case, when the time seemed right, he launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

“Because of generational change, most of America’s political elite today grew up in the relatively benign, pax-Americana post-Cold War era — 1989 to 2022” (when Putin invaded Ukraine) “and they have lost the habit and the knack of thinking about global politics in military terms,” the U.S. foreign policy historian Michael Mandelbaum told me. “Very few members of the elite today have served in the military.”
This is “very different from the Cold War era, when most of our policymaking elite were people who experienced World War II,” added Mandelbaum, author of the forthcoming book “The Titans of the Twentieth Century: How They Made History and the History They Made.” “Now, after 30 years of the post-Cold War era, Joe Biden is one of the few remaining leaders who was a policymaker during the Cold War — and issues of grand strategy and the management of great-power competition are no longer a major part of our public discourse.”


Trump, like Biden, grew up in the Cold War, but he spent a lot of it contemplating his wealth rather than contemplating the world. Trump’s instincts, Mandelbaum noted, are really a throwback to the interwar period between World War I and World War II, when a whole segment of the elite felt World War I was a failure and a mistake — the equivalent today of Iraq and Afghanistan — and then approached the dawn of World War II as isolationists and protectionists, seeing our allies as either hopeless or leeches.
As for Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson, I wonder how often he uses his passport. I wonder if he has a passport. He is one of the most powerful people in America, following in the footsteps of both Republican and Democratic speakers who advanced our interests and made us strong in the world for decades. So far, he seems to care only about serving Trump’s interests, even if that means playing extremely risky games with foreign policy.
Meanwhile, many on the left emerged from this post-Cold War era with the view that the biggest problem in the world is not too little American power but too much — the lessons they drew from Iraq and Afghanistan.
And so, who will tell the people? Who will tell the people that America is the tent pole that holds up the world? If we let that pole disintegrate, your kids won’t grow up in just a different America; they’ll grow up in a different world, and a much worse one.
After Ukraine inflicted a terrible defeat on the Russian Army — thanks to U.S. and NATO funding and weapons — without costing a single American soldier’s life, Putin now has to be licking his chops at the thought that we will walk away from Ukraine, leaving him surely counting the days until Kyiv’s missile stocks run out and he will own the skies. Then it’s bombs away.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


As Financial Times columnist Gideon Rachman just reported, “the ammunition shortage” in Ukraine “has already led to an increase in Ukrainian casualties. … The shortage of weaponry is also having an effect on the willingness of Ukrainians to volunteer for military service. The mounting pressure on the Kyiv government is part of the explanation for the public falling-out between President Volodymyr Zelensky and his commander in chief, Valeriy Zaluzhny.”
If this is the future, and our friends from Europe to the Middle East to Asia sense that we are going into hibernation, they will all start to cut deals — European allies with Putin, Arab allies with Iran, Asian allies with China. We won’t feel the change overnight, but, unless we pass this bill or something close to it, we will feel it over time.
America’s ability to assemble alliances against the probes of Russia, China and Iran will gradually be diminished. Our ability to sustain sanctions on “pariah nations” like North Korea will erode. The rules governing trade, banking and the sanctity of borders being violated by force — rules that America set, enforced and benefited from since World War II — will increasingly be set by others, and by their interests.
Yes, America still has considerable power, but that power led to influence because allies and enemies knew we were ready to use it to defend ourselves and help our friends defend themselves and our shared values. All of that will now be in doubt if this bill goes down for good.

Remember this week, folks — because historians surely will.




own for good.
Remember this week, folks — because historians surely will.
It’s a bad bill, it would be very bad for our country if this were to pass. This is a smoke screen, they aren’t trying to fix the border, they are trying to take even more advantage of the immigration wave.
 
It’s a bad bill, it would be very bad for our country if this were to pass. This is a smoke screen, they aren’t trying to fix the border, they are trying to take even more advantage of the immigration wave.
It's hilarious how quickly you guys turn on your own. VERY CONSERVATIVE Republicans create a bill to fix what you snowflakes have been crying about since Ted Cruz told you to, and as soon as Dear Leader says no, you rip the bill. It's truly remarkable. Cult members are scary.
 
JFC, do people stay up all night thinking of this stuff. People are wasting their skills, instead they should be writing Hollywood scripts.
yes...i'm sure thomas friedman would be much better off writing screenplays...
 
You don't know shink chonk!
All the laws needed to work on the border already exist, no bill is needed. And this bill has 3x as much money going to Ukraine than what is going to the border, so how is this a border bill. What don’t I know? Sounds like Biden is sending more money to Ukraine so it can get to Hunter and back to Joe himself.
 
All the laws needed to work on the border already exist, no bill is needed. And this bill has 3x as much money going to Ukraine than what is going to the border, so how is this a border bill. What don’t I know? Sounds like Biden is sending more money to Ukraine so it can get to Hunter and back to Joe himself.
its both

democrats and some of the non-trump-maniac gop wanted a funding bill that addressed israel/palenstine and ukraine...gop said only if the border is also addressed

so, now we have a bill that addresses both...
 
All the laws needed to work on the border already exist, no bill is needed. And this bill has 3x as much money going to Ukraine than what is going to the border, so how is this a border bill. What don’t I know? Sounds like Biden is sending more money to Ukraine so it can get to Hunter and back to Joe himself.
Not enough time in the day for that. 🤣
 
You say this and Goldmom goes *Boom but I don't know that any of the dems on this board believe any of that, nor does Biden. The GQP members here, however, are all about supporting the Trump Over Party, Party Over Country reps.
Good old Faulty doesn't understand the difference between one idiot Progressive and a shit load of House Republicans.
 
You say this and Goldmom goes *Boom but I don't know that any of the dems on this board believe any of that, nor does Biden. The GQP members here, however, are all about supporting the Trump Over Party, Party Over Country reps.
You’re saying there are people here who like Putin more than America as the title states?
 
You’re saying there are people here who like Putin more than America as the title states?
Yes, and sadly it's true. Putin, unprovoked, invades a sovereign country resulting in the displacement of 8 million Ukrainians, indiscriminately bombs civilians in churches, schools, and hospitals while destroying trillions of dollars worth of Ukraine's infrastructure. Yet the MAGA Republicans cult leader, Donald Trump, refuses to condemn Putin and suggests cutting off monetary aid to Ukraine.
 
Yes, and sadly it's true. Putin, unprovoked, invades a sovereign country resulting in the displacement of 8 million Ukrainians, indiscriminately bombs civilians in churches, schools, and hospitals while destroying trillions of dollars worth of Ukraine's infrastructure. Yet the MAGA Republicans cult leader, Donald Trump, refuses to condemn Putin and suggests cutting off monetary aid to Ukraine.
And that makes them like Putin better than America?
 
All the laws needed to work on the border already exist, no bill is needed. And this bill has 3x as much money going to Ukraine than what is going to the border, so how is this a border bill. What don’t I know? Sounds like Biden is sending more money to Ukraine so it can get to Hunter and back to Joe himself.
Yea right. How do you make this stuff up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Putin's a "strong-man". He just "gets shit done".

They WANT a dictator
We ALL remember DJT proclaiming Putin was "a genius" right after the invasion of Ukraine.

The Radical Right loves authoritarianism.
You are 100% correct. Republicans want to be controlled.
 
We ALL remember DJT proclaiming Putin was "a genius" right after the invasion of Ukraine.

The Radical Right loves authoritarianism.
You are 100% correct. Republicans want to be controlled.
Republicans want to THINK they are in control.

Until an actual authoritarian regime starts using that control against them (which it will; that's how authoritarianism works - they take power, then they continue to take more power and rights away)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MitchLL
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT