The left is critical of red states bussing migrants out of their area.What does the left have to say about this video?
- Thread starter Hawkeye Swarm
- Start date
Good point, these people will need healthcare. Not sure what the gotaways will do.
You need to accept that every issue you have with immigration can be mapped with a straight line right to Trump and the Republican party. Three times over the last 25 years we have have been close to getting new legislation passed to help manage the problem and three times it has been Republicans that blew it up. Two of those times were under Republican Presidents, one of them was Trump himself who blew up the legislation. But here you are, clutching your pearls wondering why Democrats won't solve your problems for you. The answer is, as always, because of Republicans.
Well, it's reality. But it's not surprising that someone who thinks that a rapist con man with over 80 felony indictments should be President can't accept the truth of the issue that Fox News has told him to be angry about.
TDS...has rotted your tiny brain as completely as syphilis.
Need to label illegals transgender. Then maybe republicans will start boycotting the businesses that hire them.
The gotaways (illegals) simply go to the emergency room for everything.
As I posted in another thread, the big guy undid previous border policy on day 1. Biden has been accused too, made it into his daughter's diary and is a sniffer. I don't feel like posting images of that. The laptop is real which means he's compromised and helps make sense why he is weak on China and Russia. Insert clip of him getting the Ukraine prosecutor fired. And homeland security is going after DT because a playboy millionaire is not a good look, lol.
Biden immediately gutted workplace enforcement raids. Why won't Biden conduct raids and charge and deport them?
Most Republicans I know want bounties on the sons-a-bitches! Besides, there aren't many melons to pick in Iowa..............
Whether it is or not ( for accuracy, you are referring to executive orders, not policy changes; please educate yourself) has nothing to do with the equivocation of bussing illegals
indiscriminately versus a city saying you can stay, but please don't because we can not afford to help you
So we should blame the businesses who may employ those already here, but not the politicians who are actively enabling illegal immigration in the first place? Great logic.
I know executive orders, which is what the big guy did, and wish he would undo what he did. And how dare you call them illegals.
JFC. You are in a cult. None of those things have any evidence supporting it and the people making the claim have been proven wrong dozens of times. They have zero credibility. How many Trump Bibles have you bought? How many "F**k Biden" flags do you have in your front yard?
Those politicians do what the big donors want. They want the cheap flow of labor to continue. Similar to the excessive spending it’s by design. Both sides want this and are merely a pantomime.
The meatpacking industry in many countries, including the United States, has a long history of employing undocumented migrants to fill essential roles within its workforce. This essay will outline the use of undocumented migrants in the meatpacking industry, examining the factors that contribute to their employment, the challenges they face, and the implications for both the industry and society.
Firstly, the demand for cheap labor in the meatpacking industry has driven employers to seek out undocumented migrants who are often willing to work for lower wages and under harsher conditions than legal residents or citizens. This reliance on undocumented workers allows meatpacking companies to minimize labor costs and maintain competitiveness in the market.
Secondly, the nature of the work in the meatpacking industry, which often involves physically demanding tasks in hazardous environments, can make it difficult to attract and retain native-born workers. Undocumented migrants, many of whom come from disadvantaged backgrounds and are willing to take on difficult and dangerous jobs in order to support themselves and their families, are often seen as a readily available source of labor for meatpacking companies.
However, the use of undocumented migrants in the meatpacking industry also raises significant ethical and social concerns. These workers often face exploitation, including low wages, long hours, and unsafe working conditions. They may be vulnerable to abuse and mistreatment by their employers, who may threaten to report them to immigration authorities if they speak out or demand better treatment.
Furthermore, the employment of undocumented migrants in the meatpacking industry can have broader social and economic implications. It can contribute to downward pressure on wages and working conditions for all workers in the industry, as employers exploit the vulnerability of undocumented workers to drive down labor costs. Additionally, the presence of undocumented migrants in the workforce can fuel resentment and hostility among native-born workers, leading to tensions and conflicts within communities.
In conclusion, the use of undocumented migrants in the meatpacking industry is driven by the demand for cheap labor and the challenging nature of the work. While it benefits employers by reducing labor costs and maintaining competitiveness, it also raises significant ethical, social, and economic concerns. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach that includes reforms to immigration policy, enforcement of labor laws, and efforts to improve working conditions and opportunities for all workers in the industry.
The relationship between California farmers and politicians regarding access to cheap migrant labor is complex and multifaceted. Here's an explanation of how this dynamic operates:
1. **Political Contributions**: California farmers, particularly those in sectors such as agriculture, have been known to make political contributions to support politicians who are sympathetic to their interests. These contributions can take various forms, including campaign donations, contributions to political action committees (PACs), and support for political causes aligned with the industry's priorities.
2. **Policy Influence**: By contributing to political campaigns, farmers seek to influence policymakers and shape legislation and regulatory policies that affect their businesses. This includes advocating for policies that support the availability of cheap migrant labor, such as more lenient immigration laws or guest worker programs that provide a steady supply of foreign labor.
3. **Access to Lawmakers**: Political contributions can also provide farmers with access to lawmakers and government officials, allowing them to directly lobby for their interests and concerns. This access may involve meetings, hearings, or other forms of communication where farmers can voice their perspectives and priorities regarding labor issues, immigration policy, and other matters relevant to their industry.
4. **Maintaining a Competitive Edge**: Access to cheap migrant labor is crucial for many California farmers to remain competitive in the agriculture industry, which often operates on thin profit margins. By supporting politicians who are sympathetic to their labor needs, farmers hope to ensure continued access to this vital source of labor, which enables them to keep production costs low and maintain profitability.
5. **Policy Impact**: The influence of farmers' political contributions on policymaking can vary depending on numerous factors, including the political climate, public opinion, and competing interests. While political contributions can help amplify farmers' voices and priorities, they are just one factor among many that policymakers consider when crafting legislation and making policy decisions.
Overall, the relationship between California farmers and politicians regarding access to cheap migrant labor involves a complex interplay of political, economic, and social factors. While political contributions can provide farmers with a means to advocate for their interests, the broader policy landscape and societal considerations also shape the outcome of labor-related policies and regulations.
Waste of resources. Considering a new batch will be brought in. Resources should go fining and punishing businesses. So it becomes cost prohibitive. Also resources to the Southern Mexico border would do more good than anything. Every time the flow slows. It’s because Mexico gets off its ass. That’s not a coincidence.
like it or not (and tough guy rhetoric notwithstanding) mexico's mutual participation is key to our border enforcement...which is why trump's remain in mexico was always going to be a temporary, "little dutch boy with his finger in the levee" solution
evenutally, the problem would become untenable for mexico and they'd say f it...these migrants aren't really our problem
i want to get away from temporary, executive order solutions that vary president by president...those kinds of wild swings in policy (real or imagined) are what drive a lot of the surges. legislative fixes to the programs are the long term solution. but those are hard to come by when people get so much political benefit from screaming about the border
The problem is an economic one. It should be part of NAFTA. Trade that has helped stabilize most of Mexico could be shifted to Central America as well. Also could import labor similar to the way the EU does. With every participant tracked. But that requires long term thinking and no quick feel good solutions.
cooperation requires the recognition of the value of mutual benefit
and when much of american politics is centered around the dual concepts of quick fixes and "go f*ck yourself"...probably unlikely we get something that provides a real solution to this kind of problem
why concede anything if there isn't an immediate political benefit?
No it isn’t . We’ve discussed this before. I’m sorry you disagree. Or can’t see the Macro reality. Why raid places when they are merely taking jobs that others do not want or can’t do. And then deport them when they are easily replaced with a different batch of illegals.
Last edited:
While I don't disagree with your premise, what we've seen for the past couple of years is FAR BEYOND what businesses want and big donors want... unless you're talking about the remake America donors like Soros, then yes obviously this is what they want.
Don’t hire them to begin with. Then no charging and deportation is needed. The rewards already far outweigh the risks to them. N amount of threat of deportation has slowed it in the past. The flow always coincides with economic activity.
A border executive order yes, covid lockdown no. C'mon man! I got stuck twice because of a high risk family member and what Fauci was saying at the time. Not once since, you are trying too hard.
I hope no one is ever a victim of identity fraud.
Businesses want profits. They don’t really care about anything else. If donors truly wanted things improved or if it was a priority. They would do something already.
E-Verify only catches one out of six illegals it checks into. Yet, that is shown to us as a solution or businesses are doing all they can. It’s all broke and a joke.
Nah, this is way bigger than just business wanting low wage workers. Just look at what's happening in the cities these migrants are ending up in. They're completely overwhelmed.
