ADVERTISEMENT

The race is breaking

One example, Harris was sent to Europe to get Macron on board with support for Ukraine before the Russian invasion. The US and NATO needed France first. That was a very successful mission. Harris also was the one who convinced Zelenskyy that an invasion was imminent when no one believed the American intelligence on the Russia build up. When you read the book, it is hard to not be impressed by her.
Her work as the Border Czar is the most telling regarding her accomplishments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
GbcCihiaoAAOiV0
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkguy77
I noticed on your analysis of her policies…no mention of her border policies?
That’s because the question was her positive policy points. The border isn’t one of them.

They ignored it for three years and finally started to do something bipartisan in the last year only to be blocked by Trump for political reasons.

I’d give her 3 years of an “F” and the past year a “B”. Averages to a “D”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RagnarLothbrok
That’s because the question was her positive policy points. The border isn’t one of them.

They ignored it for three years and finally started to do something bipartisan in the last year only to be blocked by Trump for political reasons.

I’d give her 3 years of an “F” and the past year a “B”. Averages to a “D”.
My good twin strikes again!
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeyetraveler
That’s because the question was her positive policy points. The border isn’t one of them.

They ignored it for three years and finally started to do something bipartisan in the last year only to be blocked by Trump for political reasons.

I’d give her 3 years of an “F” and the past year a “B”. Averages to a “D”.
You are buying into the Trump bumper sticker depth analysis of the issue?
Harris led the effort to a long term solution to the issue by going to central American countries and negotiating with those govts to reduce the chaos there that pushes their citizens to seek safe haven in USA.
That does not happen overnite but we are now seeing a big reduction in the numbers from those countries.
Venezuela is not friendly to USA so they were not going to be receptive to our efforts.

Trump's border policies were challenged in courts and were not going to hold anyway.

But bottom line is when the USA economy is strong (like under Biden) immigration booms.
When USA economy falters( pandemic/Trump) immigration #s drop.
Which do we prefer: strong economy or reduced immigration?
 
You are buying into the Trump bumper sticker depth analysis of the issue?
Harris led the effort to a long term solution to the issue by going to central American countries and negotiating with those govts to reduce the chaos there that pushes their citizens to seek safe haven in USA.
That does not happen overnite but we are now seeing a big reduction in the numbers from those countries.
Venezuela is not friendly to USA so they were not going to be receptive to our efforts.

Trump's border policies were challenged in courts and were not going to hold anyway.

But bottom line is when the USA economy is strong (like under Biden) immigration booms.
When USA economy falters( pandemic/Trump) immigration #s drop.
Which do we prefer: strong economy or reduced immigration?
I voted Harris because on balance I think her policies are better (albeit mediocre) and she is not Trump. I also think the economy is more important. But we are a capable nation, we can walk and chew gum at the same time.

On immigration: I believe we must streamline legal immigration to make it much easier for upstanding people to become productive citizens. I support citizenship for dreamers. I believe the long term path of lifting up these economies is good for us. It provides diversified manufacturing options away from China, less likelihood of illegal immigrants coming here, etc.

But I also have two eyes and can see what has been happening at the border under both admins. It is a crisis and Biden/Harris should have done more to address the immediacy of the issue. They waited three years. I’m giving them a bad grade. If you think the immediate crisis is not important I respect your right to that opinion, but I think you are wrong.

Finally just because I disagree with things Biden/Harris did doesn’t mean I’m a Trumper on the issue. A huge percentage of our country are independents like me who will form opinions which may differ from the party line of either party,
 
Last edited:
My good twin strikes again!
Can you imagine if there was a candidate who shared our views that actually made it through a primary. It would be a landslide in the general election.

The polar extremes of both parties really make it tough to find pragmatic solutions supported by most people.
 
You said inflation is "up 20% year over year". That is false and not even close to the actual year over year number.
That, and people seem to have forgotten about the microchip shortage resulting in supply chain issues driving prices up. Trump should have guarded against this and made sure we had an ample supply of domestic microchips.*

* the last sentence is BS but it is something MAGA people would say.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: praguehawk
Can you imagine if there was a candidate who shared our views that actually made it through a primary. It would be a landslide in the general election.

The polar extremes of both parties really make it tough to find pragmatic solutions supported by most people.
When you want to run, let me know. I will be your running mate.

Our slogan will be: Make America Sane Again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeyetraveler
When you want to run, let me know. I will be your running mate.

Our slogan will be: Make America Sane Again.
From time to time I have thought about throwing my hat in the ring. There are two problems: I won’t join a political party and someone probably has pictures of my college…ummm…indiscretions.
 
Not going to say this is accurate but David Plouffe knows a thing or two about running a campaign and winning elections. Jen O'Malley Dillon is extremely sharp as well. The ground game in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania for Harris is quite impressive. DT Barnum has little to no ground game. If Harris/Walz win the election, the GOP will almost certainly rue the day they decided to hand the reins of that party to Lara Freaking Trump.

The ground game thing is absolutely true, but it absolutely predates Lara Trump. Trump himself massively decimated the state parties with the whole "Stop the Steal" effort, in which party coffers were drained with fruitless demonstrations and lawsuits and schemes. Worse yet, anyone at the state Republican level that dared suggest the election hadn't been stolen, and resources should be reserved/directed to something more productive got the purge. So a lot of regular, experienced, effective (and conservative!) state operators got drummed out of state Republican parties, leaving behind nutbars, rookies and grifters. The ground game has been shit, much of it turned over to shady third party GOTV vendors instead of the volunteer armies that are way more effective, yet require a lot of sophisticated organization and human resource capital to recruit and organize.

Pennsylvania was absolutely one of the worst, least effective state parties after the Stop the Steal shenanigans, so ironic and not at all surprising that it may come down to that.

It is absolutely possible that the ground game deficiencies are enough to cost Trump the election, and the blame goes nowhere but at his own feet.
 
The ground game thing is absolutely true, but it absolutely predates Lara Trump. Trump himself massively decimated the state parties with the whole "Stop the Steal" effort, in which party coffers were drained with fruitless demonstrations and lawsuits and schemes. Worse yet, anyone at the state Republican level that dared suggest the election hadn't been stolen, and resources should be reserved/directed to something more productive got the purge. So a lot of regular, experienced, effective (and conservative!) state operators got drummed out of state Republican parties, leaving behind nutbars, rookies and grifters. The ground game has been shit, much of it turned over to shady third party GOTV vendors instead of the volunteer armies that are way more effective, yet require a lot of sophisticated organization and human resource capital to recruit and organize.

Pennsylvania was absolutely one of the worst, least effective state parties after the Stop the Steal shenanigans, so ironic and not at all surprising that it may come down to that.

It is absolutely possible that the ground game deficiencies are enough to cost Trump the election, and the blame goes nowhere but at his own feet.
This is precisely what Project2025 will turn your federal government into: a multi-trillion dollar grift.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
You are buying into the Trump bumper sticker depth analysis of the issue?
Harris led the effort to a long term solution to the issue by going to central American countries and negotiating with those govts to reduce the chaos there that pushes their citizens to seek safe haven in USA.
That does not happen overnite but we are now seeing a big reduction in the numbers from those countries.
Venezuela is not friendly to USA so they were not going to be receptive to our efforts.

Trump's border policies were challenged in courts and were not going to hold anyway.

But bottom line is when the USA economy is strong (like under Biden) immigration booms.
When USA economy falters( pandemic/Trump) immigration #s drop.
Which do we prefer: strong economy or reduced immigration?
Boy, talk about looking for non-existent silver linings...you have really bought the bullshit...
 
The ground game thing is absolutely true, but it absolutely predates Lara Trump. Trump himself massively decimated the state parties with the whole "Stop the Steal" effort, in which party coffers were drained with fruitless demonstrations and lawsuits and schemes. Worse yet, anyone at the state Republican level that dared suggest the election hadn't been stolen, and resources should be reserved/directed to something more productive got the purge. So a lot of regular, experienced, effective (and conservative!) state operators got drummed out of state Republican parties, leaving behind nutbars, rookies and grifters. The ground game has been shit, much of it turned over to shady third party GOTV vendors instead of the volunteer armies that are way more effective, yet require a lot of sophisticated organization and human resource capital to recruit and organize.

Pennsylvania was absolutely one of the worst, least effective state parties after the Stop the Steal shenanigans, so ironic and not at all surprising that it may come down to that.

It is absolutely possible that the ground game deficiencies are enough to cost Trump the election, and the blame goes nowhere but at his own feet.



And this is Georgia, where the Republican party pretty well held together and is effective under Kemp. But Trump refused to play nice with Kemp and sync up with Kemp's political machine until the 11th hour, because, well because Trump is a moron and the Stop the Steal stuff. If he hadn't gone to useless idiotic war with Kemp, he'd have had one of the better state orgs backing him up there.

I think Georgia is one of the states where the Trump org is using some third party GOTV provider. Which is probably some kind of grift and just moving money from the campaign into some other crony's pockets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT