How was it you made all those usernames when you got banned?Piss pants boy sure has a lot of pent up energy being released. Hopefully he runs out of steam before challenging someone to a fight.
How was it you made all those usernames when you got banned?Piss pants boy sure has a lot of pent up energy being released. Hopefully he runs out of steam before challenging someone to a fight.
okay then if you have nothing to hide, please post your tax returns on HROTWhy not? Seriously the only thing the Republicans do is engage in vindictive politics. But the second the Dems do anything it's suddenly a bad idea.
Besides if he has nothing to hide...
okay then if you have nothing to hide, please post your tax returns on HROT
"Non potable fluid donation".Anyone find the deduction for the Muscovite prostitute’s golden shower yet? You know that crook wrote it off…
It’s fascinating to observe your mind at work. This is 100% vindictive politics.It's not vindictive in the slightest. Trump is running for President again. Voters deserve to know what kind of man he is to make the best choice on whether to hire him.
You're the one basing this on feeling. The Courts said that Trump has no protections on this. I understand this hurts your feelings, but that's the way it is. Absent another court challenge Congress appears to have the rightful authority to do this.You may FEEL that way Huey, but in America we have laws. The laws say none of your feelings mean shit. If you want to make a president releasing tax returns mandatory, make it a law.
The courts said that? The courts said j6 needed them, not the public, is my understanding.You're the one basing this on feeling. The Courts said that Trump has no protections on this. I understand this hurts your feelings, but that's the way it is. Absent another court challenge Congress appears to have the rightful authority to do this.
He is an official candidate for 2024. Given his corrupt nature it is more than fair for Congress to make this information public. We deserve transparency, not more lies.It’s fascinating to observe your mind at work. This is 100% vindictive politics.
It is customary, not obligatory, for POTUS candidates to release their returns. There is no legal imperative for the returns to be made public at this time.
How was it you made all those usernames when you got banned?
Former President doesn't mean shit, is he an official candidate at this time?
Where is his challenge then? Trump loves to block this stuff. Why hasn't he begged SCOTUS to protect him?The courts said that? The courts said j6 needed them, not the public, is my understanding.
Hoping to see Schiff sweating and stammering on the witness stand in 2023.Like when Adam Schiff said he personally saw direct and irrefutable evidence that Trump collided with Russia?
Don't kid yourself.
It’s not the House Democrats’ role to do that. Releasing the actual returns is not necessary to exercise their oversight of the presidential audit process and make their recommendation to codify the process into law.It's not vindictive in the slightest. Trump is running for President again. Voters deserve to know what kind of man he is to make the best choice on whether to hire him.
There is a partial truth there. I got caught up in the NC5 thread and got banned. After realizing it was NC5 who had committed the offense @Mike Zierath unbanned me and wrote a post on the thread saying it was a mistake to have done so.I know you're not capable of self deprecating humor, so I know that I'm missing some part of the joke. I haven't been banned. You got put in time out for something I can't recall earlier this year, something to do with peeing yourself, I'm sure.
Help me understand your comment.
Common man! Nobody on team blue goes to jail for anything, unless your name is Weiner.Adam Schiff is going to be one of the first people that goes to jail over his Trump derangement syndrome. Dude was hell bent on taking Trump down, he certainly crossed lines to find dirt somewhere.
Trump tried to overthrow the government. I think it's definitely Congress' place to make public any non classified information they have on the man.It’s not the House Democrats’ role to do that. Releasing the actual returns is not necessary to exercise their oversight of the presidential audit process and make their recommendation to codify the process into law.
That's going to happen for sure.Hoping to see Schiff sweating and stammering on the witness stand in 2023.
So it was an over step?It’s not the House Democrats’ role to do that. Releasing the actual returns is not necessary to exercise their oversight of the presidential audit process and make their recommendation to codify the process into law.
The Supreme Court said the House could have them.You're the one basing this on feeling. The Courts said that Trump has no protections on this. I understand this hurts your feelings, but that's the way it is. Absent another court challenge Congress appears to have the rightful authority to do this.
There is a partial truth there. I got caught up in the NC5 thread and got banned. After realizing it was NC5 who had committed the offense @Mike Zierath unbanned me and wrote a post on the thread saying it was a mistake to have done so.
Don't sweat it.
How was it you made all those usernames when you got banned?
I said in one of the first posts i think it’s a vindictive move and akin to abuse of process by the House Dems on that committee.So it was an over step?
One of you moral avatars not named moral, or wsc, took a hammer and came back like 5 times. I think I've actually confused you of being that guy before and went back and figured it out. Idk all you @Moral avatars look the same to me.I see, I wasn't as active then, but what is this about or in reference to?
Sir, this thread is going at a page ever 12 minute pace, I apologize for making you repeat yourself.I said in one of the first posts i think it’s a vindictive move and akin to abuse of process by the House Dems on that committee.
They also didn't say the House was prohibited from releasing them to the public. By all rights, the Courts stepped aside on this issue to keep his returns private.The Supreme Court said the House could have them.
They didn’t weigh in on releasing them to the public.
One of you moral avatars not named moral, or wsc, took a hammer and came back like 5 times. I think I've actually confused you of being that guy before and went back and figured it out. Idk all you @Moral avatars look the same to me.
Please explain how this is an abuse given the Courts refusing to protect Trump on this, Trump running for 2024, him promising to release them himself, and his history of corruption?I said in one of the first posts i think it’s a vindictive move and akin to abuse of process by the House Dems on that committee.
That's the funny part. I thought I had accused Randy of doing it and after looking back had figured out it was actually you. It's whatever dude.I don't get worked up enough to get banned - I may accidentally post a nipple - and I certainly am not engaged enough to return with fresh handles. Not sure who that poster is, maybe Rudolph.
I missed that conviction Huey.Trump tried to overthrow the government. I think it's definitely Congress' place to make public any non classified information they have on the man.
That's the funny part. I thought I had accused Randy of doing it and after looking back had figured out it was actually you. It's whatever dude.
Right, they didn’t approve or disapprove it.They also didn't say the House was prohibited from releasing them to the public. By all rights, the Courts stepped aside on this issue to keep his returns private.
So anything goes, if you’re in power?Trump tried to overthrow the government. I think it's definitely Congress' place to make public any non classified information they have on the man.
Bit of a juxtaposition that you can't figure shit out and are operating under the belief it is I who is out of control, don't you think?I'm back to having no idea what you're talking about but glad to see you seem to have control of yourself again.
The House has oversight authority. They were looking at the presidential audit process. They concluded Trump’s returns did not undergo the audit process. They recommended this process be codified into law to make it mandatory.Please explain how this is an abuse given the Courts refusing to protect Trump on this, Trump running for 2024, him promising to release them himself, and his history of corruption?
Bit of a juxtaposition that you can't figure shit out and are operating under the belief it is I who is out of control, don't you think?