If ISU loses to KSU, all it will take is an ASU loss in the CCG for this to happen. Boise isn't losing, I guess maybe Tulane drops one.Asu is not losing to az.
Just sayin.
If ISU loses to KSU, all it will take is an ASU loss in the CCG for this to happen. Boise isn't losing, I guess maybe Tulane drops one.Asu is not losing to az.
Just sayin.
1) Don’t lump B1G into SEC. That’s a a joke.Whoever wins that garbage conference would finish 5th in the big 10 or sec. Change my mind.
Bullshit.Whoever wins that garbage conference would finish 5th in the big 10 or sec. Change my mind.
Asu favored by 9.Asu is not losing to az.
Just sayin.
This is correct. The top five rated conference champions get the automatic bid.Listening to Sirius XM college sports Fullride show I think the guys are Chris Childs (terrible takes) and Rick Nueheisel is decent.
Rick said that Big 12 may miss out IF Boise and Tulane win their conference titles and finish higher in the final standings. The reason is because only the top 5 highest ranked conference champs are guaranteed spots in the playoffs. B1G, SEC, ACC, MW and....? Big 12 or AAC?
If that's the case then its possible. isu, Asu, Byu and Colorado all lose then whoever wins the big 12 title game could be behind Tulane in the final standings.
Tulane plays a quality Memphis team and then a quality Army team int he AAC champ game.
Is this true or did they have it wrong?
Rick said that Big 12 may miss out IF Boise and Tulane win their conference titles and finish higher in the final standings. The reason is because only the top 5 highest ranked conference champs are guaranteed spots in the playoffs. B1G, SEC, ACC, MW and....? Big 12 or AAC?
If that's the case then its possible. isu, Asu, Byu and Colorado all lose then whoever wins the big 12 title game could be behind Tulane in the final standings.
Tulane plays a quality Memphis team and then a quality Army team int he AAC champ game.
Is this true or did they have it wrong?
Having a spot for the B12 champ is necessary. It's part of what keeps buy in among all involved. Getting a bye will likely go away at some point.
I think BYU is the only Big 12 champ that would get the #4 seed over 12-1 Boise State, based on win over SMU, the only high-quality win in the entire conference. Boise State has only 1 loss by 3 points to Oregon and has the country’s premier player; very few people could name one player on BYU, ASU or ISU; the committee people know this.That is accurate, if it were to play out like that, although highly unlikely.
The Big 12 getting a bye will go away this year if Boise wins out. Boise will take a bye and the ACC winner will take the other. Hopefully Tulane can take the last spot.
Yeah the idea that a committee is going to perfectly pick the "best" teams instead of letting conference champions move on to the playoffs is - well, it's a retarded idea. Every other sport and football league in the world can figure that shit out, but we always have these - well, retarded people - arguing that you can't do it for (formerly) D1 football.The Big 12 Champion gets in. It doesn't matter if they are "worthy", which is how it should be.
The rest need to be worthy to get in. It will depend on the polls, but it's not looking good for anyone else getting in.
Kansas isn't even bowl eligible yet.Kansas is clearly the best team in the league right now and it ain’t close. They lost a couple close ones early. It is clear that the top 5 or 6 in the Big 12 would be lower middle of the pack in the SEC and middle of the pack in the BIG.
Not if they had Texas’s schedule.1) Don’t lump B1G into SEC. That’s a a joke.
2) B12 top four would fare well in B1G.
3) if your point is that Iowa would win the B12, that’s a joke, too.
4) OSU and Oregon would each have three losses vs an SEC schedule
Why?Like so many other conferences, the current makeup of the Big12 is such a change from what most of us are familiar with. They are the leftover conference. I would almost feel bad for them, but the the Clone fans show up here and make fools out of themselves, so I'll get over it
This is what I find so funny. There’s tons of under the radar players that won’t end up at SEC powers or Ohio ST or Oregon. So what good is all this revenue that’s going to the schools like Minny or Wisconsin or even Iowa? Is it helping us or them recruit better? Because it doesn’t look like it. NIL is king. Who gives a shit about all this so called money? What is Iowa doing with it? I keep hearing from some of you that all these schools might as well just give up. Guess what? Nobody is scared of 3/4 of the Big Ten and their TV contracts.Why?
Should people in the big ten feel proud they make a lot of money ( the schools that have zero shot at playoff )?
Big XII will have a wide open path to playoff every year. I would rather have that vs a nicely funded women’s crew team.
If by “fare well” you mean compete for 5th-12th place, that’s fair.2) B12 top four would fare well in B1G
I’m not much for discussing fantasy worlds, but although Iowa wouldn’t be an overwhelming favorite in the Big 12, it doesn’t make sense that their winning it would be a joke; there are zero high-quality teams in that conference and as I type this there are 9 teams still alive that could win it, none having clearly superior teams compared to Iowa.3) if your point is that Iowa would win the B12, that’s a joke, too.
Again, making stuff up is fun, but these arguments are both based on preexisting bias. I doubt any team could get through a typical SEC schedule unscathed, but your “three losses” statement is a bigger joke than anything you’re accusing others of.1) Don’t lump B1G into SEC. That’s a a joke.
4) OSU and Oregon would each have three losses vs an SEC schedule
Teams get in based on their wins and losses...not the personalities on their team. "We have a star player" is not an argument to get a playoff bye or bid. Bowl selection sure...but not a legitimate playoff.I think BYU is the only Big 12 champ that would get the #4 seed over 12-1 Boise State, based on win over SMU, the only high-quality win in the entire conference. Boise State has only 1 loss by 3 points to Oregon and has the country’s premier player; very few people could name one player on BYU, ASU or ISU; the committee people know this.
You and KF both. His boxers would get a lot tighter knowing that ISU had won a bcs major bowl (Fiesta) since him and earned a CFP berth before him and has skill players QB (Purdy) and RB (Montgomery) having highly productive and visible careers in the NFL while KF not so much.....
BYU and Colorado both had pretty good paths but they choked. All I know is if ISU sneaks in I'm gonna vomit.
Thnx. Made me laugh. FIFY. There's a reason why OUT both left the league and also why Stanford, Berkley and some others thumbed their nose at the thought of joining the B12. No name brands and no academic jugernauts left. KU finally got off it's arse and is actually doing something about it's historically irrelevant FB program b/c they want in with the P2. (They will get in, btw, but primarily b/c of their BB program). Big 12 goin' the way of the Big East. (basketball league)
Yeah, right. If the CFP committee has proven anything, it’s that brand recognition and star power influence them greatly.Teams get in based on their wins and losses...not the personalities on their team. "We have a star player" is not an argument to get a playoff bye or bid. Bowl selection sure...but not a legitimate playoff.
Why?
Should people in the big ten feel proud they make a lot of money ( the schools that have zero shot at playoff )?
Big XII will have a wide open path to playoff every year. I would rather have that vs a nicely funded women’s crew team.
as opposed to the big 12 which is made up of mediocre and terrible teamsBIG should only have 2 teams in. Indiana got an Iowa schedule this year with the usual thumping once they played a good team. Penn St needed a trick play to survive the the mighty gophers! BIG is a classic top heavy conference - 2 good teams, a few mediocre teams and the rest are just terrible.
It doesn't really matter in a few years. The BIG and SEC have been meeting and you know damn well the BIG 12 ain't gonna be part of BIG Boy football much longer. The writing is on the wall and your team is in a conference of misfit toys. The BIG 12 will be irrelevant within a few years and the revenue will tank for you clowns.BIG should only have 2 teams in. Indiana got an Iowa schedule this year with the usual thumping once they played a good team. Penn St needed a trick play to survive the the mighty gophers! BIG is a classic top heavy conference - 2 good teams, a few mediocre teams and the rest are just terrible.
The big 12 is the island of misfit toys. Their revenue stream is gonna tank in a few years. Cincinnati? Seriously? South Florida? Seriously?as opposed to the big 12 which is made up of mediocre and terrible teams
FIFYPoor mans Big Ten West 😎
They need to go to 16. No byes...it's too big of an advantage.
Getting a home game is a huge advantage already. Add to that the team you're facing just got beat the F up by another top tier team the week previous and it's just a way too big advantage.
Thanks for the clarification. I obviously thought they were getting a home game.The teams getting byes will not get a home game too. Their first game will be a neutral site bowl game (previously known as the NY6). Teams 5-8 will get opening round home games, but there’s nothing saying teams 9-12 got the F beat out of them by top tier teams the week before like this year with Boise, Indiana, Tulane/Big 12. Chances are they’ll all need to win to keep their place.
But I agree 16 would be better, although not for the same reasons. They’ll still have opening round games on campus I’d believe.
OK, add "should" to my comment. But are they not beholden to the rankings and official formula in place?Yeah, right. If the CFP committee has proven anything, it’s that brand recognition and star power influence them greatly.
Kansas is the best team in the nation that isn't eligible for a bowl. Their last 3 wins have been solid. Not great because the big 12 is average at best, but when you beat 3 of the top 4. They are fun to watch.Kansas isn't even bowl eligible yet.
FIFYUgh, Stanford and Cal weren’t invited b/c there was no money, and they are currently earning zero TV dollars as members of the ACC.
Not according to this article:Ugh, Stanford and Cal weren’t invited and they are currently earning zero TV dollars as members of the ACC.
Holy shit. These are opinions, so they can’t be disproven.1) Don’t lump B1G into SEC. That’s a a joke.
2) B12 top four would fare well in B1G.
3) if your point is that Iowa would win the B12, that’s a joke, too.
4) OSU and Oregon would each have three losses vs an SEC schedule
LMAO, they played that during the fluke year...COVID, they brought that exact same team back the following year and got their asses kicked IN AMES by Iowa. Now Purdy is doing the exact same thing in the NFL, the bigger the game, the more he chokes, he took a great team......the 49ers's down with him. He rolls up great stats against nobodies, but when the game is on the line he chokes.You and KF both. His boxers would get a lot tighter knowing that ISU had won a bcs major bowl (Fiesta) since him and earned a CFP berth before him and has skill players QB (Purdy) and RB (Montgomery) having highly productive and visible careers in the NFL while KF not so much.
Not according to this article:
ACC will add Stanford, Cal, SMU next year to create another super conference - Fayetteville Observer (link)
Quote:
'For the ACC, adding three schools will increase media rights revenue from its long-term deal with ESPN and allow the conference to spread much of that new money to existing members.
New conference members typically — though not always — forgo a full share of revenue for several years upon entry.
Cal and Stanford will receive a partial share of ACC Tier 1 media revenue — estimated at about $25 million annually — for the next nine years before getting a full payment in the final three years of the conference’s deal with ESPN, according to a person familiar with the terms. The person spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity because the ACC and the schools have not disclosed the finances.
Cal and Stanford will get a 30% share in the first seven years, followed by 70% in year eight and 75% in year nine before getting the full amount, the person said.'
I think the reason ISU black-balled Calford is b/c they would bring too much competition for ISUs taste. lol. Let's see what the B12s value is when they re-up in 5 yrs. Part of the reason ESPN extended their contract was to help get OUT out of the B12 sooner. Leverage is now poof.
Btw, the ACC wouldn't trade 'em for WVa and UCF. lol
And the entire country will tune in to see northwestern Purdue Maryland Rutgers Minnesota vandy and another dozen or more trash bottom feeders play every week. Ohio St Michigan and Oregon can’t play each other every week.It doesn't really matter in a few years. The BIG and SEC have been meeting and you know damn well the BIG 12 ain't gonna be part of BIG Boy football much longer. The writing is on the wall and your team is in a conference of misfit toys. The BIG 12 will be irrelevant within a few years and the revenue will tank for you clowns.
Curious why Kansas and k state don’t play the final week of the season. Seems like an obvious rivalry game.Kansas is the best team in the nation that isn't eligible for a bowl. Their last 3 wins have been solid. Not great because the big 12 is average at best, but when you beat 3 of the top 4. They are fun to watch.
I don’t know if they ever have. Back in the day of the B8, Kansas and Mizzou were bitter rivals…FB and BB.Curious why Kansas and k state don’t play the final week of the season. Seems like an obvious rivalry game.