ADVERTISEMENT

This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...

I mean, yeah. I love the Ukraine PR machine but they foresaw the invasion long enough ago to make most tanks inoperable? Ukraine has taken or destroyed 3k of them since the war started.
OPY6Cn.gif
 
I mean, yeah. I love the Ukraine PR machine but they foresaw the invasion long enough ago to make most tanks inoperable? Ukraine has taken or destroyed 3k of them since the war started.
I mean, you know they were invaded in 2014 right? That was almost a full decade ago.
 
I mean, yeah. I love the Ukraine PR machine but they foresaw the invasion long enough ago to make most tanks inoperable? Ukraine has taken or destroyed 3k of them since the war started.
Meh. What if they started a year ago? How many tanks did Russia have in storage that could be quickly made operable? It seems plausible given how corrupt Russia is that a big dent was made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timinatoria
Abrams tanks are in Germany. As I read the story these are for training purposes and the ones we are giving are being readied for shipment.
Not enough and not fast enough. It is nice to see Susan and Lindsey criticizing the speed of deliveries. Now go talk to MTG and Tommy Tuberville.

 
Posting this separately as it has only one smoke plume and am hoping it is a different fire:)
It appears to be in the area of a nuclear reactor.



"A new fire declared in Dzerzhinsky near Moscow. Warehouses near a cogeneration plant are on fire, according to local media." (Damn-just tires.)

 
Last edited:
Then Russia should have no operable tanks at the moment. But they do.
Personally I think the tank numbers that get posted have to be inflated to a degree. "Destroyed" tanks that have been recovered and repaired ect.....if the numbers were correct the Russians would be done by now.

That said they've obviously taken heavy losses.....just not at the reported degree IMO.
 
Personally I think the tank numbers that get posted have to be inflated to a degree. "Destroyed" tanks that have been recovered and repaired ect.....if the numbers were correct the Russians would be done by now.

That said they've obviously taken heavy losses.....just not at the reported degree IMO.
I use a “divide by 3” rule on all Ukrainian reported numbers. Even then the Russian losses are staggering.
 
Posting this separately as it has only one smoke plume and am hoping it is a different fire:)
It appears to be in the area of a nuclear reactor.



"A new fire declared in Dzerzhinsky near Moscow. Warehouses near a cogeneration plant are on fire, according to local media." (Damn-just tires.)

R.891dde99fa91e8d1f6014100b96c5184

Another 'the Simpson's predicted it'?
 
WSJ spells out how a vote for Trump is essentially a vote for Russia to win in Ukraine:

Donald Trump’s refusal to commit to aiding Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion portends a stark choice for U.S. voters if the war is still raging in November 2024: The wide-ranging support for Kyiv under President Biden, or indifference to the winner of a conflict that has cost the U.S. and its allies tens of billions of dollars.

The former president, who is also the GOP’s leading contender to challenge Mr. Biden next year, also challenged the broadly unified support in the mainstream of the Republican Party for backing Ukraine, with some GOP lawmakers pushing the Biden administration to provide Kyiv with even more advanced and lethal weaponry.

Mr. Trump’s comments added to concerns in Europe that the war in Ukraine could grow polarized in U.S. domestic politics as the presidential race approaches, splitting voters and members of Congress down partisan lines. Kyiv’s allies said they feared U.S. support for Ukraine could fray.
Mr. Trump told a town hall event hosted by CNN on Wednesday that his priority would be to put a swift end to the war. He declined to say whether he wanted Ukraine to win the conflict, and called on Europe to put up more of the money keeping Kyiv in the fight. With tens of thousands of Russian troops occupying large swaths of southern and eastern Ukraine and the Crimean Peninsula, an imminent cease-fire would essentially hand a partial victory to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“Russians and Ukrainians, I want them to stop dying,” he said. “And I’ll have that done in 24 hours.”

 
WSJ spells out how a vote for Trump is essentially a vote for Russia to win in Ukraine:

Donald Trump’s refusal to commit to aiding Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion portends a stark choice for U.S. voters if the war is still raging in November 2024: The wide-ranging support for Kyiv under President Biden, or indifference to the winner of a conflict that has cost the U.S. and its allies tens of billions of dollars.

The former president, who is also the GOP’s leading contender to challenge Mr. Biden next year, also challenged the broadly unified support in the mainstream of the Republican Party for backing Ukraine, with some GOP lawmakers pushing the Biden administration to provide Kyiv with even more advanced and lethal weaponry.

Mr. Trump’s comments added to concerns in Europe that the war in Ukraine could grow polarized in U.S. domestic politics as the presidential race approaches, splitting voters and members of Congress down partisan lines. Kyiv’s allies said they feared U.S. support for Ukraine could fray.
Mr. Trump told a town hall event hosted by CNN on Wednesday that his priority would be to put a swift end to the war. He declined to say whether he wanted Ukraine to win the conflict, and called on Europe to put up more of the money keeping Kyiv in the fight. With tens of thousands of Russian troops occupying large swaths of southern and eastern Ukraine and the Crimean Peninsula, an imminent cease-fire would essentially hand a partial victory to Russian President Vladimir Putin.


“Russians and Ukrainians, I want them to stop dying,” he said. “And I’ll have that done in 24 hours.”


Weird, how I'd pointed this out over a year ago to people....
 
WSJ spells out how a vote for Trump is essentially a vote for Russia to win in Ukraine:

Donald Trump’s refusal to commit to aiding Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion portends a stark choice for U.S. voters if the war is still raging in November 2024: The wide-ranging support for Kyiv under President Biden, or indifference to the winner of a conflict that has cost the U.S. and its allies tens of billions of dollars.

The former president, who is also the GOP’s leading contender to challenge Mr. Biden next year, also challenged the broadly unified support in the mainstream of the Republican Party for backing Ukraine, with some GOP lawmakers pushing the Biden administration to provide Kyiv with even more advanced and lethal weaponry.

Mr. Trump’s comments added to concerns in Europe that the war in Ukraine could grow polarized in U.S. domestic politics as the presidential race approaches, splitting voters and members of Congress down partisan lines. Kyiv’s allies said they feared U.S. support for Ukraine could fray.
Mr. Trump told a town hall event hosted by CNN on Wednesday that his priority would be to put a swift end to the war. He declined to say whether he wanted Ukraine to win the conflict, and called on Europe to put up more of the money keeping Kyiv in the fight. With tens of thousands of Russian troops occupying large swaths of southern and eastern Ukraine and the Crimean Peninsula, an imminent cease-fire would essentially hand a partial victory to Russian President Vladimir Putin.


“Russians and Ukrainians, I want them to stop dying,” he said. “And I’ll have that done in 24 hours.”

Yet another reason to not vote for Trump.

That said...if the war is still going on in November 2024 there will be pressure to end the war from many quarters...to include NATO members IMO.
 
Good news is that the river looks narrow if Ukraine really wants to cross it with bridging equipment.

"The bridge over the Snov River near the village of Karpovychi in the Chernihiv region was struck by the Russian Aerospace Forces"


 
  • Like
Reactions: Torg
I have friends in the UK and I keep getting such messages:

Just spotted 2 RAF Typhoons escorting a RAF Rivet Joint into the Black sea.

RAF is over Romania in force. Tankers, fighters, SIGNIT and the likes

The Rivet Joint is a NATO/US recon plane, which I had a chance to see at SAC in Nebraska. For a plane fanatic like me, it brought tears to my eyes.

The offensive has begun...pray for the good guys. They are indeed going into the heart of the battle.

52885548132_f31a162f01_c.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT