Hell Russia is down to using prisoners and other fodder, N. Koreans. And they think they are a superpower, LMFAO.
Trump: Zelensky ‘has no cards,’ ‘shouldn’t be at meetings’ with Russia
- Thread starter cigaretteman
- Start date
Outstanding. And those other countries will continue to offer their support, with strings attached.
Mining rights, a percentage of thr farming revenue, land, SOMETHING was going to be needed as repayment. If you guys would have tried selling this as doing it out of the kindness of our heart instead of "great ROI to weaken Russia" you would have gotten laughed out of the room.
Remind us about honest and fair scheduled elections in Russia or Belarus…
It's amazing that so many people don't understand that we are destroying an enemy's military for a cheap price.
Who do you think is housing and feeding the refugees?
Why are you carrying water for simpletons?
How do you know what plans were or were not discussed/implemented?
My money is on the fact that you were not involved in the planning in the past and will not be in the future.
What does “it’s time to get some payment” mean?
I did. And your payment question, means we didn't just spend billions of dollars to protect some sunflowers on the other side of the globe for free.
With zero loss of life.
Again, what does “it’s time” mean? Is the clock ticking?
Do you understand how much of the money spent actually was spent buying American products?
Your list is not jiving with your talk regarding corruption.
Yupp.
Zalinsky, and you, can play dumb all.you want. The golden rule is he with the gold rules and without US backing him Zalinsky will be a mud puddle in less than a week.
Did you expect the money/ munitions we sent over there to have zero expectations of repayment?
You really do need to be talked out of eating your own shit on a regular basis, don’t you?
Simpleton.
You think payment is gonna be immediate?
My gosh, why bother asking, I guess.
So you are expecting some form of payment.... something like a tax or garnishment?
They borrow hundreds of billions at a time, nobody is expecting the money tmrw.
Your frustration needs to Fallon the feet of Joe Biden. Dude had 3 years to come up with something better than "you handle it" and he didn't.
You are the poster talking about “ it’s about time” for payment. Neither you nor I know anything about US assistance being tied to repayment or not. Possibly some aid was grants, possibly some loans.
You continue to say there was no plan by the previous admin. You know this how?
Don’t attempt to understand complicated situations, because it doesn’t seem to end well.
We are 4 years in and Ukraine is more dependent on us than ever.
There is your plan.
Be better.
You just can't help yourself.
OK. So, you don’t know US plans. Clarification received.
I'm all ears. Give me an example of something we have done to help Ukraine be self supportive and not dependent on US?
3.5 years in, a failure to plan is a plan to fail. What we have done is created a dependent on the other side of the world. Good luck kicking that ****er out of the house.
Funding them so they can fight the fight for one.
You still can't recognize your stupid mistake. So typical.
"Funding" LOL, Riley I couldn't have said "created a dependent" better myself.
You don't "fund" something to independence, you give them structure and systems.
Millions of children suggest otherwise as just one example. You get so many things wrong.
I supported Trump but his treatmen...'s proving true.
He's just making s!@t up now
Sure. Those areas are hosting Ukrainian refugees. You got me.
You responded to me, you spent your time responding to someone you don’t take seriously. What’s that say about you?
Do explain how they're supposed to hold elections when 1) large chunks of their country is occupied by invaders 2) millions of their people have been forced to flee their homes, if not outright leave the country 3) it would be near-impossible to guarantee the safety of people as they voted since it's not likely Putin would take a day off from dropping bombs.
Also - Ukrainians don't have an issue with this. They understand the realities.
hawkeyetraveler
HB Heisman
Still waiting for someone to explain a legitimate reason for us to conduct negotiations without one of the two parties in the conflict at the table.
So far all I’ve heard was we spent a bunch of money and might makes right.
Imagine going back in time to Republicans heroes like Reagan and Eisenhower and telling them we were taking the side of the Soviets because we were tired of spending money helping West Germany and we are bigger than they are so they just have to take it.
This is perhaps the single dumbest foreign policy take I have ever seen and that includes how the west carved up the Middle East in the first half of the 1900’s.
So far all I’ve heard was we spent a bunch of money and might makes right.
Imagine going back in time to Republicans heroes like Reagan and Eisenhower and telling them we were taking the side of the Soviets because we were tired of spending money helping West Germany and we are bigger than they are so they just have to take it.
This is perhaps the single dumbest foreign policy take I have ever seen and that includes how the west carved up the Middle East in the first half of the 1900’s.
The irony of a guy who joined a year ago talking like he has a mouse in his pocket to a guy who has been here over 2 decades was not lost on me either.
You are of the belief this war is over the people and not the resources?
I like sunflowers if that was the sticking point.
There isn't a great reason other than Trump knows Zalinsky is inevitably going to bend the knee and he is going to get the job done and then propose how it's going to look to Zalinsky. The next step being "this is what i got, if you don't like it, best of luck". It isn't great, no doubt.
Similar threads
