ADVERTISEMENT

This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...


giphy.gif
 
Their targeted weapons systems are 30-40 years out of date. We showed better capabilities in firs gulf war.

The truth of Russia's military capabilities being aired out in full light is hilarious on this forum...given all the hyperbole and bullshit in past military threads here about how formidable Russia is militarily. And how much bullshit some of the typical OT idiots spewed.
 
The truth of Russia's military capabilities being aired out in full light is hilarious on this forum...given all the hyperbole and bullshit in past military threads here about how formidable Russia is militarily. And how much bullshit some of the typical OT idiots spewed.

It's all about those nukes.

Hopefully they're in horrible shape as well...
 
So if NATO would grow some and give them the planes, Ukraine's air power would grow by a third, and I bet they would feel safer flying more sorties.
Just asking, but does Ukraine have the trained pilots and functioning airstrips to support 30+ donated MiGs? I know the two fields closest to Kiev have been hit hard. And, I think some of the raids today were directed at airfields in the western half of Ukraine. It might be a sign of Russian weakness that they do not have the missiles to get to these bases, and they won’t risk more jets due to SAM losses that deep into Ukraine.
 
Just asking, but does Ukraine have the trained pilots and functioning airstrips to support 30+ donated MiGs? I know the two fields closest to Kiev have been hit hard. And, I think some of the raids today were directed at airfields in the western half of Ukraine. It might be a sign of Russian weakness that they do not have the missiles to get to these bases, and they won’t risk more jets due to SAM losses that deep into Ukraine.
They had over 80 jet aircraft listed as active before the war. Apparently some of the planes were destroyed on the ground. They should have plenty of pilots. And they probably have scattered their aircraft to use desolate strips though out the nation, especially in the West.
 
Is waiving the Soviet flag sort of like waiving the Rebel flag for Russians or something like that?

You know, the whole "We will rise again" thing?
If the Soviets had "risen up" to rebel against Russia, they'd be the same.

As it stands, no. They aren't remotely the same thing.
 
What is it about Kamala that always makes her seem so insincere?

She's here talking in Romania now, and it seems like she's trying to please a speech coach.

Virtually every time she speaks it seems like she doesn't have any conviction in what she's saying.

Right words, but her delivery is just awkward.
Yes, she is not a good speaker. Our former VP wasn't very good either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noleclone2
If the Soviets had "risen up" to rebel against Russia, they'd be the same.

As it stands, no. They aren't remotely the same thing.

You're such a toolbag.

Putin is the embodiment of the old Soviet Union. He's the former KGB strongman. Making Russia Great Again is his entire life's mission at this point. The new Stalin.
 
Ok, I haven’t read this thread in a while. Who is in this thread sucking off Putin?
Nole Nat 97 and some retread calling himself Clownhater are the two leading the charge.
That 97 is a real person, right? It’s been asked of some Noles before and they insist he’s a for real person. Just a gullible tool.
 
Nole Nat 97 and some retread calling himself Clownhater are the two leading the charge.
That 97 is a real person, right? It’s been asked of some Noles before and they insist he’s a for real person. Just a gullible tool.
Can you quote something I've posted that you consider 'support for Putin'?

I'm just wondering if you're in the not so discerning camp that thinks because someone is aware of a motivation, or can explain a viewpoint, that in turn can only mean that they adopt and embrace that viewpoint.

Are you personally limited in such a fashion?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT