This really is Nazi like. How can they not see what they have turned into...
How’s this for a conservative response.I believe Joe's Place is correct. Once Senate Republicans know House support belongs to Republicans (if the midterms go as expected), you'll see a dwindling of support. Their sabotaging of the WH increases the moment the GOP controls the House.
Ukraine MUST see major gains before that occurs.
The ongoing fear of a nuclear response preventing your scenario.How’s this for a conservative response.
Slow joe grows a set and says it’s now time for putin and his army to go home. Occupied lands will have UN elections next spring.
If not our airpower and naval power will begin protecting the rest of Ukraine from all attacks.
Not talking targets in russia.The ongoing fear of a nuclear response preventing your scenario.
Personally, I wish NATO would bomb the piss out of Russia.
Just my guess, but I bet we're still stipulating not to use it against targets in Russia.
Russia claims to have destroyed two but they have no proof. And today they are claiming one was sold by Ukraine bandits to Chechnya This was echoing the silly claim that two of the French Caesars had been sold to Russia.Just my guess, but I bet we're still stipulating not to use it against targets in Russia.
This allows them to fire from much safer locations.
Was it this thread that it was posted that two of the HIMARS had been destroyed? If not I'll go look for it.
Us denies any Himars were destroyed.Russia claims to have destroyed two but they have no proof. And today they are claiming one was sold by Ukraine bandits to Chechnya This was echoing the silly claim that two of the French Caesars had been sold to Russia.
Not talking targets in russia.
Just in ukraine.
Not talking targets in russia.
Just in russia.
What YOU say:
What Putin hears:
A fact known and used effectively by the media and DNC for the past 20 years. Rs are just now beginning to catch up. Unfortunately Trump was the one who figured it out first for the Rs.The use of social media, tapping into fear and appealing to emotions is much more effective than real data or science.
That's funny right there. Newt Gingrich and the Religious Right were convincing people they were going to hell if they were Democrats 25-30 years ago.A fact known and used effectively by the media and DNC for the past 20 years. Rs are just now beginning to catch up. Unfortunately Trump was the one who figured it out first for the Rs.
Without a complicit media, that's just mudslinging. Nothing like the identity politics of recent.That's funny right there. Newt Gingrich and the Religious Right were convincing people they were going to hell if they were Democrats 25-30 years ago.
Are you claiming Newt wasn't tapping into fear and emotions? The fact there was no social media then is irrelevant. If anything, the way they were able to manipulate and consolidate the Christian vote through demonizing Democrats is even more impressive without it.Without a complicit media, that's just mudslinging. Nothing like the identity politics of recent.
Without a complicit media, that's just mudslinging. Nothing like the identity politics of recent.
Just so we're abundantly clear, your contention is that only one of the two major parties engages in divisive tactics, rhetoric and policy?Yeah....I don't see Dems running around with torches shouting "Jews Will Not Replace Us", worried about "Trans people in restrooms" or "Migrant Caravans".
You know full well which party has exploited division and fear for the past two decades. It's not the Democrats.
It’s pretty bipartisan…Just so we're abundantly clear, your contention is that only one of the two major parties engages in divisive tactics, rhetoric and policy?