- Sep 13, 2002
- 99,454
- 208,947
- 113
Those with power pretending to be aggrieved victims standing up for all that is right with the world? Where have I seen that before?
Those with power pretending to be aggrieved victims standing up for all that is right with the world? Where have I seen that before?
Here's what he said in 2020. It's pretty clear he's trying to make a case about the future.Maybe you didn't listen to what Elon said when you said: "Hard to believe this was ever a controversial take." He said "the fighter jet era has passed" - as in past tense. He didn't say that "unmanned has been the future of the air for awhile."
Let him make it and then put it up against a manned F-35. I'm sure there is a pilot willing to take that challenge on. My money is on the F-35 absolutely obliterating the drone.“The competitor should be a drone fighter plane that’s remote-controlled by a human, but with its maneuvers augmented by autonomy. The F-35 would have no chance against it,” he wrote.
Only way it happens is when long time from now we can construct large aircraft capable of ridiculous speeds and maneuverability with G forces that no human could operate at. We a long way away from that tech.Let him make it and then put it up against a manned F-35. I'm sure there is a pilot willing to take that challenge on. My money is on the F-35 absolutely obliterating the drone.
He couldn't even build a minisub to rescue the soccer team and now he's building autonomous death fighters.Here's what he said in 2020. It's pretty clear he's trying to make a case about the future.
“The fighter jet era has passed,” Musk said to U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. John Thompson at the Air Warfare Symposium in Orlando. “Drone warfare is where the future will be. It’s not that I want the future to be – it’s just, this is what the future will be,” he added.
“The Joint Strike Fighter, there should be a competitor ... that’s a controversial subject but I don’t think it’s good to have one provider,” Musk said. He later elaborated on Twitter that the F-35 competitor should be a drone.
“The competitor should be a drone fighter plane that’s remote-controlled by a human, but with its maneuvers augmented by autonomy. The F-35 would have no chance against it,” he wrote.
Let him make it and then put it up against a manned F-35. I'm sure there is a pilot willing to take that challenge on. My money is on the F-35 absolutely obliterating the drone.
Exactly. Augmented with AI and possibly controlled like a video game. I doubt we're far from that at all.Only way it happens is when long time from now we can construct large aircraft capable of ridiculous speeds and maneuverability with G forces that no human could operate at. We a long way away from that tech.
You sound mad cause he's buying Twitter.He couldn't even build a minisub to rescue the soccer team and now he's building autonomous death fighters.
Depends if the drone is stealth or not. If it's stealth, the two planes just fly around unable to find each other until they run out of gas. I suppose one of them might get lucky and just happen to spot the other. I guess it would be advantage: drone there.Let him make it and then put it up against a manned F-35. I'm sure there is a pilot willing to take that challenge on. My money is on the F-35 absolutely obliterating the drone.
You sound mad that Kanye is buying Parler.You sound mad cause he's buying Twitter.
Savvy that he mentions a potential recession as an excuse to be a moral coward. He's going to have to sell out to the nuts to be Speaker, and he's clearly dipping his toe into the water to get acclimated.
Pssst, you are arguing with a retread handle. He's got all day to go back and forth, and play semantics.Maybe you didn't listen to what Elon said when you said: "Hard to believe this was ever a controversial take." He said "the fighter jet era has passed" - as in past tense. He didn't say that "unmanned has been the future of the air for awhile."
You spelled “Ferentz” wrongThose 1920’s football helmets would make Halas proud.
It takes a special sort of arrogance to think humans can outperform machine learning and performance.Let him make it and then put it up against a manned F-35. I'm sure there is a pilot willing to take that challenge on. My money is on the F-35 absolutely obliterating the drone.
Is that like Ludicrous Speed?
What’s the reason to declare martial law now?
I hope it means that they fear they are losing control of the country. Probably too optimistic, I know.What’s the reason to declare martial law now?
I presume this is primarily intended for the annexed ukranian territories? Maybe either to keep them from crossing to Ukrainian territory or to abduct civilians and take them deep into Russia so there aren't any Ukrainians left in the territory to give a damn about it?
It’s what happens after i eat Pizza Hut.Is that like Ludicrous Speed?
They didn't attack infrastructure early on because the war was going to over in 7-10 days. Why blow up everything only to have to rebuild it once you take control of the country.Of course I realize that.
Just saying that if Russia's objective is to disperse Ukrainian assets to defend against thoise attacks it seems to be working. I just think Russia's objective right now is to make it to the winter "pause" and limit Ukrainian gains till then.
It's not like Russia wasn't committing war crimes before now...it just seems like those war crimes are linked to a tangible objective now. Kind of surprised they weren't attacking infrastructure from the get go.
Why aren’t we all being driven around in self-driving cars then?It takes a special sort of arrogance to think humans can outperform machine learning and performance.
U.S. RC-135's are based at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha, NE.Not a drone.
Surveillance plane (picks up electronic signals).
A surveillance mission of n RAF Boeing RC-135W (reg. ZZ665) is underway. So far nothing unusual.
The strange thing is that in addition to the Rivet Joint we have also tracked two RAF Eurofigther FGR.4s (reg. ZK351, ZK362 – callsign PSYCHO61/62) that are escorting the aircraft over the Black Sea.
While the RC-135W took off from the UK, the two Typhoons departed from RAF Akrotiri, Cyprus, and carried out an in-flight refuelling over the east coast of Romania with the help of an RAF tanker, an Airbus KC.2 (reg. ZZ343), which also took off from Cyprus.
The entire mission is carried out while the aerial surveillance was provided by a NATO AWACS (Boeing E-3A, reg. LX-N90451) which took off from Geilenkirchen, Germany.
Ukraine pilots probably have never seen an F-16 let alone know how to fly one. They need MIG-29 or SU-27's.Sure. That is why Ukraine is begging for F-16s when they already have drones, when F-16s are trash compared to the F-22.
Dayum.
It has nothing to do with machine learning. It has everything to do with current capabilities of drones. If we develop drones the size of combat aircraft then maybe some day people can fly them remotely as we do current drones. Eventually they may be as efficient as manned aircraft, but the technology isn't there yet which means fighter aircraft isn't over yet. The design of what they do has changed however. Dogfighting isn't a big priority any longer. That seems to be far less important than bombing runs, protecting assets on the ground, etc... Those can't be done by drones yet.It takes a special sort of arrogance to think humans can outperform machine learning and performance.