ADVERTISEMENT

This season and Kirk: where do they rank all time?

that 1985 team was great, no doubt; but do you think this year's team would fumble away a game like Iowa did in the 1986 Rose Bowl? I just think this team does not beat itself by making mistakes

but this year's team needs to win the Rose Bowl and finish 13-1 and if it does, they will have beaten 2 ranked teams on the road and the #6 team in the country; they will have also done something that 1985 could not do and that's win the grand daddy of them all
This team wouldn't be in the 1985-6 Rose Bowl because they didn't win their conference. This team has given us a hell of a ride but I find it hard to believe the best Iowa team of all time went tooth and nail with so many bad teams and couldn't get their 2nd string QB in the game more than once all year. I remember the '85 team well and they were a cut above this group- who I think is very good.
 
Last edited:
I am well aware the 85 team was a good team, however; they lost 2 games including the Rose Bowl to a 13th ranked 8-2-1 UCLA team and finished with a record of 10-2. I honestly don't care if they had 24 1st round draft picks they were still 10-2, I also do not care if Harmon ran backwards 15 times and set the ball in the endzone, they lost the game. I do not know how you could argue that if Iowa (which finished 12-0 if 85 team did that they are national champs) wins the rose bowl to finish 13-1 and beating Pac 12 Champion and ranked 6th (much better ranking and record than 85 UCLA)....so what if their only loss was on the road to top 5 OSU, Iowas only loss this year was to 3rd ranked MSU team in Big 10 Championship game....it is fact that when Iowa ends up at 13-1 they will be best team in history of Iowa
We will simply have to disagree. I believe the '85 team was significantly better. That is my opinion & I am entitled that just like you are entitled to your opinion. I've given my reasons & they have nothing to do with records. I don't believe your record tells the story. It is certainly part of it, but not the whole story. We were the best team in the B10 that year as we won the conference, played all the best teams, only had one loss...one the road to a top 5 team. The only other loss was a game that was thrown by likely our best player...maybe the best talent in the history of Iowa football. I could go down the line player by player/position by position, but it would get obvious real quick. It wouldn't be to the millennial fans, but would be to a majority of the old guard. A sampling would be Ronnie Harmon vs Jordan Canzeri. Larry Station vs Josey Jewell. And so on & so forth. I am a huge, huge Beathard guy...going back to last year. I love him as much as any Iowa QB that has ever been, but I certainly do not put him in the Chuck Long category. Chuck was a Heisman runner up. CJ may be that good, but will never be under this coaching staff as he'll never be allowed to be that type of player that Chuck was. When it comes to receivers...outside of the tailback lopsided comparison, WR might be the widest gap. Robert Smith, Happel, Quinn Early, Ronnie Harmon, Kevin Harmon, etc...etc...Even David Hudson at fullback was a stud & better than any of our fullbacks of current times. Devon Mitchell was a 1st round draft pick in the secondary. Jay Norvell was a great player at safety. Rob Houghtlin may be the best kicker we've ever had. Kenny Sims was a great corner. Finally, Mark Vlasic was a phenomenal backup QB who had as much arm strength as any Iowa QB that has ever been. I haven't even brought up the lines on both sides. Mike Flagg was an all American tight end. Also, keep in mind that unlike today, Illinois & Purdue had great teams back then. Even Indiana had some very good teams. The B10 had one pushover & that was Northwestern. Outside of that, you played everyone & were not able to hide like you can in some years with the expanded B10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TS568
Illinois was an oddball team that year. They were a preseason top 10 and finished 6 - 5 - 1 and unrated. They beat tO$U and tied Michigan 3 - 3. The week after the Michigan tie we beat them in IC 59 - 0. They lost to a 3 - 5 Purdue team and then lost to a terrible Army team in a bowl game. They did play USC and Nebraska non-con while we played Drake and N. Illinois.
 
I'm not sure what you are referring to...

Apparently you didn't watch us get embarrassed last year. Any Iowa fan who watched our bowl game last year would know exactly what I was referring to. I'm 40 years old and that was the worst Hawkeye loss I've seen in my lifetime. Not sure what I'm referring to? Go **** yourself you stupid troll.
 
Apparently you didn't watch us get embarrassed last year. Any Iowa fan who watched our bowl game last year would know exactly what I was referring to. I'm 40 years old and that was the worst Hawkeye loss I've seen in my lifetime. Not sure what I'm referring to? Go **** yourself you stupid troll.
You have me confused with someone else. I said nothing about last year's game & the abomination of our program that it was.
 
Great season that will be remembered for a long time, but this team is missing one important component of an all time great season - a conference championship. A rose bowl victory would be awesome but it wouldn't quite be on the level of previous rose bowls as it is this year's prize for the conference runner up.
 
Great season that will be remembered for a long time, but this team is missing one important component of an all time great season - a conference championship. A rose bowl victory would be awesome but it wouldn't quite be on the level of previous rose bowls as it is this year's prize for the conference runner up.

2009 team didn't win a conference title either... 2015 Iowa was the only unbeaten team going in the CCG it just so happens with the expanding conference you now have to win a CCG to be conference champs regardless if you have no losses in your division or three.

1985 won the conference outright despite losing one game like MSU did this year.Iowa in 2002 and 2015 didn't lose a conference game during the regular season.
 
Great season that will be remembered for a long time, but this team is missing one important component of an all time great season - a conference championship. A rose bowl victory would be awesome but it wouldn't quite be on the level of previous rose bowls as it is this year's prize for the conference runner up.

Thing is, Iowa effectively did get that championship. The divisions are the new conferences, with a dedicated postseason game for each division winner. The only wrench is that cross-division games count in the standings. But we won every game on our regular season schedule. This team deserves equal credit with any conference champion from the old system. We entered a playoff quarterfinal and lost.

Would we have gone to the Rose Bowl under the old system? Well, if we go undefeated all season, of course. But then again the setup was different. Trade MD and NE for two of the traditional B10 powers we missed this year. Impossible to say what would have happened.
 
If we beat Stanford I would have a hard time saying the RESULTS from this year don't surpass 1985 even though I don't feel they are as talented. 13-1 would be pretty damn special with a win over the Pac 12 champ which is what the 85 team played in the Rose Bowl....not to mention the only loss was a 3 point last minute loss. Might be a good thing to revisit the thread after the RB and after we see what MSU does in the playoffs.
 
I am well aware the 85 team was a good team, however; they lost 2 games including the Rose Bowl to a 13th ranked 8-2-1 UCLA team and finished with a record of 10-2. I honestly don't care if they had 24 1st round draft picks they were still 10-2, I also do not care if Harmon ran backwards 15 times and set the ball in the endzone, they lost the game. I do not know how you could argue that if Iowa (which finished 12-0 if 85 team did that they are national champs) wins the rose bowl to finish 13-1 and beating Pac 12 Champion and ranked 6th (much better ranking and record than 85 UCLA)....so what if their only loss was on the road to top 5 OSU, Iowas only loss this year was to 3rd ranked MSU team in Big 10 Championship game....it is fact that when Iowa ends up at 13-1 they will be best team in history of Iowa
It is your opinion which means it is not a fact. It is my opinion the '85 team (assuming Ronnie Harmon was not on shakedown during the game) played this year's version....they would wipe them off of the field. Since I think that, does that make it fact?
 
It is your opinion which means it is not a fact. It is my opinion the '85 team (assuming Ronnie Harmon was not on shakedown during the game) played this year's version....they would wipe them off of the field. Since I think that, does that make it fact?
Moot point, both teams are behind 09 team now and there is no debating that....both teams were huge disappointment in bowl game
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT