ADVERTISEMENT

Time for a 1993 Bill Clinton Deal to Cut Spending & Raise Taxes by Equal Amounts

West Dundee Hawkeye

HR All-American
Sep 28, 2003
3,075
1,731
113
In 1993, Bill Clinton passed his econ plan which cut spending & raised taxes by equal amounts.

This is the Grand Bargain & has not been done since.

He did this without 1 GOP vote.

Many said the econ would tank.

Instead the 1990's boomed.

What Clinton did led to FOUR BALANCED BUDGETS.

The Labor Force Participation Rate was at a post WW2 high and has not been as high since.

Savings-Investment=Exports-Imports

Balance the fricking budget & pay down debt. This increases SAVINGS which then increase EXPORTS which then helps the Working Class.

Help Working Class
 
At least Republicans can understand this simple math. Half of something = half of something else., Er, ah, ......., oh well.
 
Good luck, right after Clinton balanced the budget Bush won the Electorial college and immediately took the surplus and blew it.

Then he got into 2 wars.

If the Dems sacrificed their policies to balance the budget the GOP would just take it and blow it again.
 
This isn't what balanced the budget for Clinton,.. but it's a good idea and I would support it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SIXERS24
Many in the media have flubbed this story. The New York Times on October 1st said, “Clinton balances the budget.” Others have praised George Bush. Political analyst Bill Schneider declared on CNN that Bush is one of “the real heroes” for his willingness to raise taxes — and never mind read my lips. (Once upon a time, lying was something that was considered wrong in Washington, but under the last two presidents our standards have dropped.) In any case, crediting George Bush for the end of the deficit requires some nifty logical somersaults, since the deficit hit its Mount Everest peak of $290 billion in St. George’s last year in office.
And 1993 — the year of the giant Clinton tax hike — was not the turning point in the deficit wars, either. In fact, in 1995, two years after that tax hike, the budget baseline submitted by the president’s own Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted $200 billion deficits for as far as the eye could see. The figure shows the Clinton deficit baseline. What changed this bleak outlook?
Newt Gingrich and company — for all their faults — have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. Yet today’s surplus is, in part, a byproduct of the GOP’s single-minded crusade to end 30 years of red ink. Arguably, Gingrich’s finest hour as Speaker came in March 1995 when he rallied the entire Republican House caucus behind the idea of eliminating the deficit within seven years.


We have a balanced budget today that is mostly a result of 1) an exceptionally strong economy that is creating gobs of new tax revenues and 2) a shrinking military budget. Social spending is still soaring and now costs more than $1 trillion.

Skeptics said it could not be done in seven years. The GOP did it in four.
Now let us contrast this with the Clinton fiscal record. Recall that it was the Clinton White House that fought Republicans every inch of the way in balancing the budget in 1995. When Republicans proposed their own balanced‐budget plan, the White House waged a shameless Mediscare campaign to torpedo the plan — a campaign that the Washington Post slammed as “pure demagoguery.” It was Bill Clinton who, during the big budget fight in 1995, had to submit not one, not two, but five budgets until he begrudgingly matched the GOP’s balanced‐budget plan. In fact, during the height of the budget wars in the summer of 1995, the Clinton administration admitted that “balancing the budget is not one of our top priorities.”
 
Many in the media have flubbed this story. The New York Times on October 1st said, “Clinton balances the budget.” Others have praised George Bush. Political analyst Bill Schneider declared on CNN that Bush is one of “the real heroes” for his willingness to raise taxes — and never mind read my lips. (Once upon a time, lying was something that was considered wrong in Washington, but under the last two presidents our standards have dropped.) In any case, crediting George Bush for the end of the deficit requires some nifty logical somersaults, since the deficit hit its Mount Everest peak of $290 billion in St. George’s last year in office.
And 1993 — the year of the giant Clinton tax hike — was not the turning point in the deficit wars, either. In fact, in 1995, two years after that tax hike, the budget baseline submitted by the president’s own Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted $200 billion deficits for as far as the eye could see. The figure shows the Clinton deficit baseline. What changed this bleak outlook?
Newt Gingrich and company — for all their faults — have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. Yet today’s surplus is, in part, a byproduct of the GOP’s single-minded crusade to end 30 years of red ink. Arguably, Gingrich’s finest hour as Speaker came in March 1995 when he rallied the entire Republican House caucus behind the idea of eliminating the deficit within seven years.




Skeptics said it could not be done in seven years. The GOP did it in four.
Now let us contrast this with the Clinton fiscal record. Recall that it was the Clinton White House that fought Republicans every inch of the way in balancing the budget in 1995. When Republicans proposed their own balanced‐budget plan, the White House waged a shameless Mediscare campaign to torpedo the plan — a campaign that the Washington Post slammed as “pure demagoguery.” It was Bill Clinton who, during the big budget fight in 1995, had to submit not one, not two, but five budgets until he begrudgingly matched the GOP’s balanced‐budget plan. In fact, during the height of the budget wars in the summer of 1995, the Clinton administration admitted that “balancing the budget is not one of our top priorities.”

I agree Gingrich had an impact as did Pres Bush (the father) but so did Bill Clinton.

Budget Deficits/Surpluses 1990's

DEFICIT (IN BILLIONS)DEBT INCREASE (IN BILLIONS)DEFICIT-TO-GDP RATIO

1993$255$3473.7%
1994$203$2812.8%
1995$164$2812.1%
1996$107$2511.3%
1997$22$1880.3%
1998($69)$113(0.8%)
1999($126)$130(1.3%)
2000($236)$18(2.3%)
2001($128)$133(1.2%)
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT