well...FB a little different than BB...just by the nature of the sport. Although I wouldn't mind having leaders like Dez King on the BB team. But I get your point...and yes I read the post after the PennSt game...wow brutal.
..my view is simple> we did not get beat by the 4 teams because of attitude or temperament...we got beat because they played better (which makes them better than us) and way too many possessions we helped them...both ends (turnovers, rebounding & getting totally out of whack (position) on defense. Until the team limits that we are NOT talented enough to overcome...not in the B1G especially.
I also believe it takes even an experienced coach to come around...I understand MichSt has played a really brutal schedule..but I've also seen some of there other games...they damn near got beat at home by a lower level..it takes even the great Tom Izzo time to come around to his new group.
I do feel better after the ND game. First the 6 TO's were terrific. Fran didn't hesitate to change the lineup...Moss got 24 min instead of 2 the previous game...a sign that coach is coming around.
My expectations are starting 4 freshman (assuming Cook starts when he gets back)...is going to be great for the future but frustrating in the meantime.
hawk-i-bob.....I don't know if attitude and temprement are the best description, but it has to do with buy in at the level that the coaches are pushing for, effort at a level that the players maybe don't yet understand, in essence an emotional and mental intensity that allows them to execute at a higher level. That is the parallel that I am looking for. Experience......to me has to do not just with the Xs & Os, but with the mental toughness and discipline that it takes to execute what the coaches want on a regular basis. That is a learned behavior...but as much mental and emotional as it is physical and attitude and temprement I think are a part of that. Maybe that explains what I was trying to say more clearly.